| Literature DB >> 29947938 |
K Egger1, C Strecker2, E Kellner3, H Urbach4.
Abstract
There are several automated analytical methods to detect thromboembolic vascular occlusions, the infarct core and the potential infarct-endangered tissue (tissue at risk) by means of multimodal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The infarct core is more reliably visualized by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI or CT perfusion than by native CT. The extent of tissue at risk and endangerment can only be estimated; however, it seems essential whether "tissue at risk" actually exists. To ensure consistent patient care, uniform imaging protocols should be acquired in the referring hospital and thrombectomy center and the collected data should be standardized and automatically evaluated and presented. Whether patients with a large infarct core and with or without tissue at risk or patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) but low NIHSS benefit from thrombectomy has to be evaluated in controlled clinical trials using standardized imaging protocols. A promising, potentially time-saving approach is also native CT and CT angiography using a flat-panel detector angiography system for assessment of vessel occlusion and leptomeningeal collaterals.Entities:
Keywords: Imaging protocols; Infarct classification; Infarct core; Perfusion; Tissue at risk
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29947938 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-018-0535-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nervenarzt ISSN: 0028-2804 Impact factor: 1.214