| Literature DB >> 28282851 |
Gen Li1,2, Ke Ma3, Jian Sun4,5, Gui Jin6, Mingxin Qin7, Hua Feng8.
Abstract
Cerebral edema is a common disease, secondary to craniocerebral injury, and real-time continuous monitoring of cerebral edema is crucial for treating patients after traumatic brain injury. This work established a noninvasive and noncontact system by monitoring the magnetic induction phase shift (MIPS) which is associated with brain tissue conductivity. Sixteen rabbits (experimental group n = 10, control group, n = 6) were used to perform a 24 h MIPS and intracranial pressure (ICP) simultaneously monitored experimental study. For the experimental group, after the establishment of epidural freeze-induced cerebral edema models, the MIPS presented a downward trend within 24 h, with a change magnitude of -13.1121 ± 2.3953°; the ICP presented an upward trend within 24 h, with a change magnitude of 12-41 mmHg. The ICP was negatively correlated with the MIPS. In the control group, the MIPS change amplitude was -0.87795 ± 1.5146 without obvious changes; the ICP fluctuated only slightly at the initial value of 12 mmHg. MIPS had a more sensitive performance than ICP in the early stage of cerebral edema. These results showed that this system is basically capable of monitoring gradual increases in the cerebral edema solution volume. To some extent, the MIPS has the potential to reflect the ICP changes.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral edema; intracranial pressure; magnetic induction; noncontact; real-time monitoring
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28282851 PMCID: PMC5375823 DOI: 10.3390/s17030537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The equivalent circuit of the noninvasive and noncontact system of magnetic induction.
Figure 2The two-coil sensor for rabbits experiment.
Figure 3Rabbit freezing point and ICP sensor placement.
Figure 4Experimental setup to monitor cerebral edema in rabbits with the MIPS method.
Figure 5(a) The 24 h MIPS results of the No. 3 rabbit in the experiment group; (b) 24 h MIPS results of the No. 12 rabbit in the control group.
Figure 6The mean ± standard deviation 24 h trends of MIPS and ICP. The green triangle indicated the time of a significant difference between the experimental group and control occurred. (a) Comparison of MIPS in experimental group and control group rabbit; (b) Comparison of ICP in experimental group and control group rabbit.
BWC results from the experimental rabbits and the control rabbits at the 24th hour.
| Sample | BWC (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard Deviation | |
| experimental group | 81.59 | 0.88 |
| control group | 78.03 | 0.51 |
Independent t-test of ICP and MIPS from experiment group and control group.
| Time | Sample | Variances | F | Significance | t | Significance (Two-Tailed) | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| 0 h | ICP1 | Equal variances assumed | 1.333 | 0.265 | −0.641 | 0.531 | −0.718 | 0.385 |
| Equal variances not assumed | −0.643 | 0.534 | −0.743 | 0.403 | ||||
| 1 h | MIPS1 | Equal variances assumed | 3.087 | 0.098 | 8.720 | 1.78 × 10−7 | 1.325 | 2.176 |
| Equal variances not assumed | 7.490 | 1.29 × 10−4 | 1.199 | 2.302 | ||||
| 1 h | ICP2 | Equal variances assumed | 0.029 | 0.868 | −0.596 | 0.559 | −0.759 | 0.426 |
| Equal variances not assumed | −0.620 | 0.548 | −0.757 | 0.423 | ||||
| 2 h | ICP3 | Equal variances assumed | 0.005 | 0.945 | 0.800 | 0.435 | −0.412 | 0.912 |
| Equal variances not assumed | 0.875 | 0.398 | −0.368 | 0.868 | ||||
| 3 h | ICP4 | Equal variances assumed | 0.754 | 0.398 | 2.502 | 0.024 | 0.115 | 1.385 |
| Equal variances not assumed | 2.941 | 0.01 | 0.207 | 1.293 | ||||
Correlation analysis of ICP and MIPS from the experimental group.
| Sample | Correlation Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|
| No. 1 rabbit | −0.8742 | 0.01 |
| No. 2 rabbit | −0.8208 | 0.01 |
| No. 3 rabbit | −0.7645 | 0.01 |
| No. 4 rabbit | −0.7865 | 0.01 |
| No. 5 rabbit | −0.8674 | 0.01 |
| No. 6 rabbit | −0.8857 | 0.01 |
| No. 7 rabbit | −0.7804 | 0.01 |
| No. 8 rabbit | −0.9153 | 0.01 |
| No. 9 rabbit | −0.9092 | 0.01 |
| No. 10 rabbit | −0.8027 | 0.01 |