| Literature DB >> 31284231 |
Bin Yang1, Bing Li2, Canhua Xu1, Shijie Hu2, Meng Dai1, Junying Xia1, Peng Luo2, Xuetao Shi1, Zhanqi Zhao3, Xiuzhen Dong1, Zhou Fei4, Feng Fu5.
Abstract
Cerebral edema after brain injury can lead to brain damage and death if diagnosis and treatment are delayed. This study investigates the feasibility of employing electrical impedance tomography (EIT) as a non-invasive imaging tool for monitoring the development of cerebral edema, in which impedance imaging of the brain related to brain water content is compared with intracranial pressure (ICP). We enrolled forty patients with cerebral hemorrhage who underwent lateral external ventricular drain with intraventricular ICP and EIT monitoring for 3 h after initiation of dehydration treatment. The average reconstructed impedance value (ARV) calculated from EIT images was compared with ICP. Dehydration effects induced changes in ARV and ICP showed a close negative correlation in all patients, and the mean correlation reached R2 = 0.78 ± 0.16 (p < .001). A regression equation (R2 = 0.62, p < .001) was formulated from the total of measurement data. The 95% limits of agreement were - 6.13 to 6.13 mmHg. Adaptive clustering and variance analysis of normalized changes in ARV and ICP showed 92.5% similarity and no statistically significant differences (p > .05). Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of changes in ICP >10 mmHg were 0.65, 0.73 and 0.70 respectively. The findings show that EIT can monitor changes in brain water content associated with cerebral edema, which could provide a real-time and non-invasive imaging tool for early identification of cerebral edema and the evaluation of mannitol dehydration.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral edema; Dehydration treatment; Electrical impedance tomography; Intracranial pressure
Year: 2019 PMID: 31284231 PMCID: PMC6612924 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1Timeline of the experiment and processing of the data. A: Timeline of monitoring and dehydration treatment. EIT data acquisition was started 20 min before mannitol infusion and lasted for at least 200 min. Mannitol solution was administered via intravenous infusion in 20 min. The first 20 min of EIT data was chosen as reference data for the differential imaging of EIT. B: An example of raw measurement data and processed data for ICP and EIT. The raw and filtered curves of intracranial pressure were plotted on top and middle represented the mean of the raw resistivity values measured from 192 channels. Bottom showed the change of ARV calculated from EIT images. C: EIT images reconstructed from the potential changes between the current data and the reference data employing a differential imaging algorithm.
Patients characteristics.
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Age(years) | 53[45.5–63] |
| Gender(M/F) | 28/12 |
| Glasgow Coma Scale score | 6[5–8] |
| Admission diagnosis | |
| Basal/thalamic ganglia hemorrhage | 21(52.5) |
| Cerebral lobe hemorrhage | 10(25) |
| Cerebellar hemorrhage | 3(7.5) |
| Ventricular hemorrhage | 6(15) |
Data are expressed as median [interquartile range] or n (%).
ICU intensive care unit, M males, F females.
Fig. 2Comparison of EIT measurement and ICP on all patients at different time points during dehydration treatment. A: The mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation of ICP at five time points during mannitol dehydration. B: The mean, standard error and coefficient of variation of ARV at five time points during mannitol dehydration. The histogram, error bar and square symbol represent mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation of ICP and EIT measurement at different times, respectively. P value indicates the statistical significance. Since the mean of EIT measured data is close to zero at the beginning of infusion, there is no coefficient of variation of ARV at this time.
Fig. 3EIT images, ΔARV and ΔICP curves from two representative patients, showing a sustained and gradually weakening dehydration effect, respectively, during mannitol treatment. A: Serial EIT images showing gradual enhancing blue areas inside the cranial cavity with continuous impedance changes in the brain. B: Decreasing change in ΔICP, increasing change in ΔARV at the initial treatment stage, and then maintenance until the end of the recording. C: Blue areas in the serial EIT images attenuate after their enhancement presented corresponding impedance changes in the brain. D: Decreasing ΔICP and increasing ΔARV at the initial treatment stage but changing in opposite directions. The scale bars at the right of EIT images represents the possible range of colors from diminished impedance (red) to normal baseline intensity (green) and increased impedance (blue).
Fig. 4The results of correlation analysis between ΔARV and ΔICP. A: Regression relationship between ΔARV and ΔICP of 40 patients during mannitol dehydration treatment. B and C: Consistency assessments between ΔICP and the fitted value calculated by ΔARV. Bland–Altman plot (B) shows 96.9% differences are in the 95% limits of agreement between −6.13 and 6.13 mmHg and standardized residual plot (C) shows 97.8% of the residuals are in the normal range. Each dot represents the mean measured value for each 10 min during mannitol dehydration treatment.
Fig. 5The tree diagrams of hierarchical clustering of normalized changes in intracranial pressure (ΔICPnorm) (A) and average reconstructed value (ΔARVnorm) (B) and the corresponding cluster centers of ΔICPnorm (C) and ΔARVnorm (D). The horizontal axes of the tree diagrams in (A) and (B) are the number of patients. The dashed line presents the standard error.
Fig. 6ROC for predicting changes of ICP >10 mmHg. The diagonal line represents a random chance (0.5).