Toshiaki Wada1, Kenji Kawada2, Ryo Takahashi1, Mami Yoshitomi1, Koya Hida1, Suguru Hasegawa3, Yoshiharu Sakai1. 1. Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin- Kawara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. 2. Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin- Kawara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. kkawada@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence technology with indocyanine green (ICG) provides a real-time assessment of intestinal perfusion. However, a subjective evaluation of fluorescence intensity based on the surgeon's visual judgement is a major limitation. This study evaluated the quantitative assessment of ICG fluorescence imaging in determining the transection line of the proximal colon during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 112 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancers. After distal transection of the bowel, the specimen was extracted extracorporeally and then the proximal colon was divided within the well-perfused area based on the ICG fluorescence imaging. We evaluated whether quantitative assessment of intestinal perfusion by measuring ICG intensity could predict postoperative outcomes: F max, T max, T 1/2, and Slope were calculated. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in 5 cases (4.5%). Based on the fluorescence imaging, the surgical team opted for further proximal change of the transection line up to an "adequate" fluorescent portion in 18 cases (16.1%). Among the 18 patients, AL occurred in 4 patients (4/18: 22.2%), whereas it occurred in only 1 case (1/94: 1.0%) in the good perfusion patients who did not need proximal change of the transection line. The F max of the AL group was less than 52.0 in all 5 cases (5/5), whereas that of the non-AL group was in only 8 cases (8/107): with an F max cutoff value of 52.0, the sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of AL were 100 and 92.5%, respectively. Regarding postoperative bowel movement recovery, the T max of the early flatus group or early defecation group was significantly lower than that of the late flatus group or late defecation group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICG fluorescence imaging is useful for assessing anastomotic perfusion in colorectal surgery, which can result in more precise operative decisions tailored for an individual patient.
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence technology with indocyanine green (ICG) provides a real-time assessment of intestinal perfusion. However, a subjective evaluation of fluorescence intensity based on the surgeon's visual judgement is a major limitation. This study evaluated the quantitative assessment of ICG fluorescence imaging in determining the transection line of the proximal colon during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 112 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancers. After distal transection of the bowel, the specimen was extracted extracorporeally and then the proximal colon was divided within the well-perfused area based on the ICG fluorescence imaging. We evaluated whether quantitative assessment of intestinal perfusion by measuring ICG intensity could predict postoperative outcomes: F max, T max, T 1/2, and Slope were calculated. RESULTS:Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in 5 cases (4.5%). Based on the fluorescence imaging, the surgical team opted for further proximal change of the transection line up to an "adequate" fluorescent portion in 18 cases (16.1%). Among the 18 patients, AL occurred in 4 patients (4/18: 22.2%), whereas it occurred in only 1 case (1/94: 1.0%) in the good perfusion patients who did not need proximal change of the transection line. The F max of the AL group was less than 52.0 in all 5 cases (5/5), whereas that of the non-AL group was in only 8 cases (8/107): with an F max cutoff value of 52.0, the sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of AL were 100 and 92.5%, respectively. Regarding postoperative bowel movement recovery, the T max of the early flatus group or early defecation group was significantly lower than that of the late flatus group or late defecation group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:ICG fluorescence imaging is useful for assessing anastomotic perfusion in colorectal surgery, which can result in more precise operative decisions tailored for an individual patient.
Authors: Mehraneh D Jafari; Steven D Wexner; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; David A Margolin; Danny A Sherwinter; Sang W Lee; Anthony J Senagore; Michael J Phelan; Michael J Stamos Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Boris Jansen-Winkeln; N Holfert; H Köhler; Y Moulla; J P Takoh; S M Rabe; M Mehdorn; M Barberio; C Chalopin; T Neumuth; I Gockel Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2019-02-02 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: S Hayami; K Matsuda; H Iwamoto; M Ueno; M Kawai; S Hirono; K Okada; M Miyazawa; K Tamura; Y Mitani; Y Kitahata; Y Mizumoto; Hiroki Yamaue Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Christian Dam Lütken; Michael P Achiam; Jens Osterkamp; Morten B Svendsen; Nikolaj Nerup Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: B Jansen-Winkeln; M Maktabi; J P Takoh; S M Rabe; M Barberio; H Köhler; T Neumuth; A Melzer; C Chalopin; I Gockel Journal: Chirurg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Jonas Hedelund Rønn; Nikolaj Nerup; Rune Broni Strandby; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Rikard Ambrus; Lars Bo Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 3.445