Literature DB >> 29353371

A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.

Alexandra Martin1, J Ryan Stewart2, Jeremy Gaskins3, Erin Medlin2.   

Abstract

The Internet is a major source of health information for gynecologic cancer patients. In this study, we systematically explore common Google search terms related to gynecologic cancer and calculate readability of top resulting websites. We used Google AdWords Keyword Planner to generate a list of commonly searched keywords related to gynecologic oncology, which were sorted into five groups (cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, vulvar cancer, vaginal cancer) using five patient education websites from sgo.org . Each keyword was Google searched to create a list of top websites. The Python programming language (version 3.5.1) was used to describe frequencies of keywords, top-level domains (TLDs), domains, and readability of top websites using four validated formulae. Of the estimated 1,846,950 monthly searches resulting in 62,227 websites, the most common was cancer.org . The most common TLD was *.com. Most websites were above the eighth-grade reading level recommended by the American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institute of Health (NIH). The SMOG Index was the most reliable formula. The mean grade level readability for all sites using SMOG was 9.4 ± 2.3, with 23.9% of sites falling at or below the eighth-grade reading level. The first ten results for each Google keyword were easiest to read with results beyond the first page of Google being consistently more difficult. Keywords related to gynecologic malignancies are Google-searched frequently. Most websites are difficult to read without a high school education. This knowledge may help gynecologic oncology providers adequately meet the needs of their patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Google search terms; Gynecologic cancers; Online patient education materials; Readability; Websites

Year:  2019        PMID: 29353371     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1319-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors:  M C Freda; K Damus; I R Merkatz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information.

Authors:  Daniela B Friedman; Laurie Hoffman-Goetz
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-06

3.  Variable Quality and Readability of Patient-oriented Websites on Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Eline H Schreuders; Esmée J Grobbee; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon C W Spaander; Sander J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information.

Authors:  P R Fitzsimmons; B D Michael; J L Hulley; G O Scott
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Edinb       Date:  2010-12

5.  Online patient information from radiation oncology departments is too complex for the general population.

Authors:  Stephen A Rosenberg; David M Francis; Craig R Hullet; Zachary S Morris; Jeffrey V Brower; Bethany M Anderson; Kristin A Bradley; Michael F Bassetti; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01

6.  Committee Opinion No. 676: Health Literacy to Promote Quality of Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Peering into the Deep: Characterizing the Internet Search Patterns of Patients with Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Jane McLeod; Irene Yu; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Search Engine Ranking, Quality, and Content of Web Pages That Are Critical Versus Noncritical of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.

Authors:  Linda Y Fu; Kathleen Zook; Zachary Spoehr-Labutta; Pamela Hu; Jill G Joseph
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Google and Women's Health-Related Issues: What Does the Search Engine Data Reveal?

Authors:  Mazin Baazeem; Haim Abenhaim
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2014-10-16

10.  Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions.

Authors:  Kenneth Lee; Kreshnik Hoti; Jeffery David Hughes; Lynne Emmerton
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  2 in total

1.  Literacy assessment of preimplantation genetic patient education materials exceed national reading levels.

Authors:  Macy L Early; Priyanka Kumar; Arik V Marcell; Cathleen Lawson; Mindy Christianson; Lydia H Pecker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Public interest and awareness regarding general health, sleep quality and mental wellbeing during the early COVID-19 pandemic period: An exploration using Google trends.

Authors:  Patrick Lemoine; David Ebert; Yoshihiko Koga; Claire Bertin
Journal:  Sleep Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.