Literature DB >> 28278597

A Digital Feedback System to Support Implementation of Measurement-Based Care by School-Based Mental Health Clinicians.

Aaron R Lyon1, Michael D Pullmann1, Kelly Whitaker1, Kristy Ludwig1, Jessica Knaster Wasse2, Elizabeth McCauley1.   

Abstract

Evidence supports the utility of measurement-based care (MBC) to improve youth mental health outcomes, but clinicians rarely engage in MBC practices. Digital measurement feedback systems (MFS) may reflect a feasible strategy to support MBC adoption and sustainment. This pilot study was initiated to evaluate the impact of a MFS and brief consultation supports to facilitate MBC uptake and sustainment among mental health clinicians in the education sector, the most common mental health service delivery setting for youth. Following an initial training in MBC, 14 clinicians were randomized to either a digital MFS and brief consultation supports or control. Baseline ratings of MBC attitudes, skill, and use were collected. In addition, daily assessment ratings tracked 2 core MBC practices (i.e., assessment tool administration, provision of feedback) over a 6-month follow-up period. Clinicians in the MFS condition demonstrated rapid increases in both MBC practices, whereas the control group did not significantly change. For clinicians in the MFS group, consultation effects were significant for feedback and approached significance for administration. Over the follow-up period, average decreases in the current study were moderate with only 1 of the 2 outcome variables (administration) decreasing significantly. Inspection of individual clinician trajectories revealed substantial within-group trend variation. MFS may represent an effective MBC implementation strategy beyond initial training, although individual clinician response is variable. Identifying feasible and impactful implementation strategies is critical given the ability of MBC to support precision health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28278597      PMCID: PMC6072621          DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol        ISSN: 1537-4416


  51 in total

1.  Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures. National survey.

Authors:  Simon M Gilbody; Allan O House; Trevor A Sheldon
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument.

Authors:  Jennifer L Close-Goedjen; Stephen M Saunders
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; Christopher M Callahan; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Marc Hoffing; Richard D Della Penna; Polly Hitchcock Noël; Elizabeth H B Lin; Patricia A Areán; Mark T Hegel; Lingqi Tang; Thomas R Belin; Sabine Oishi; Christopher Langston
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.

Authors:  R Goodman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  The implementation of a Pain Monitoring Programme for nurses in daily clinical practice: results of a follow-up study in five hospitals.

Authors:  M de Rond; R de Wit; F van Dam
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Clinicians and outcome measurement: what's the use?

Authors:  Ann F Garland; Marc Kruse; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  A survey of the assessment practices of child and adolescent clinicians.

Authors:  David J Palmiter
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2004-04

8.  The effectiveness of depression care management on diabetes-related outcomes in older patients.

Authors:  John W Williams; Wayne Katon; Elizabeth H B Lin; Polly H Nöel; Jason Worchel; John Cornell; Linda Harpole; Bridget A Fultz; Enid Hunkeler; Virginia S Mika; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Comparing the validity of clinician-generated diagnosis of conduct disorder to the diagnostic interview schedule for children.

Authors:  Jeremy Jewell; Michael Handwerk; Julie Almquist; Christopher Lucas
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2004-09

10.  Pathways into and through mental health services for children and adolescents.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Z Farmer; Barbara J Burns; Susan D Phillips; Adrian Angold; E Jane Costello
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Current Assessment Practice Evaluation-Revised (CAPER) in a National Sample.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Michael D Pullmann; Shannon Dorsey; Prerna Martin; Alexandra A Grigore; Emily M Becker; Amanda Jensen-Doss
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Middle and High School Student Perspectives on Digitally-Delivered Mental Health Assessments and Measurement Feedback Systems.

Authors:  Ashley M Mayworm; Brynn M Kelly; Mylien T Duong; Aaron R Lyon
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-07

3.  Effects of Fidelity-Focused Consultation on Clinicians' Implementation: An Exploratory Multiple Baseline Design.

Authors:  E B Caron; Mary Dozier
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2019-07

4.  Implementation strategies to promote measurement-based care in schools: evidence from mental health experts across the USA.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Connors; Aaron R Lyon; Kaylyn Garcia; Corianna E Sichel; Sharon Hoover; Mark D Weist; Jacob K Tebes
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-06-21

5.  Evidence Base Update for Brief, Free, and Accessible Youth Mental Health Measures.

Authors:  Emily M Becker-Haimes; Alexandra R Tabachnick; Briana S Last; Rebecca E Stewart; Anisa Hasan-Granier; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2019-12-11

6.  Exploration, Preparation, and Implementation of Standardized Assessment in a Multi-agency School Behavioral Health Network.

Authors:  Elizabeth Connors; Gwendolyn Lawson; Denise Wheatley-Rowe; Sharon Hoover
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-09-17

7.  Impact of a Web-Based Electronic Health Record on Behavioral Health Service Delivery for Children and Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Alyssa N Hook; Elizabeth M Parker; Isabella Esposito; April Sather; Ryan M Parigoris; Aaron R Lyon; Kelly L Hyde
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.