Literature DB >> 28278067

Recommended test methods and pass/fail criteria for a respirator fit capability test of half-mask air-purifying respirators.

Ziqing Zhuang1, Michael Bergman1, Zhipeng Lei1, George Niezgoda1, Ronald Shaffer1.   

Abstract

This study assessed key test parameters and pass/fail criteria options for developing a respirator fit capability (RFC) test for half-mask air-purifying particulate respirators. Using a 25-subject test panel, benchmark RFC data were collected for 101 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-certified respirator models. These models were further grouped into 61 one-, two-, or three-size families. Fit testing was done using a PortaCount® Plus with N95-Companion accessory and an Occupational Safety and Health Administration-accepted quantitative fit test protocol. Three repeated tests (donnings) per subject/respirator model combination were performed. The panel passing rate (PPR) (number or percentage of the 25-subject panel achieving acceptable fit) was determined for each model using five different alternative criteria for determining acceptable fit. When the 101 models are evaluated individually (i.e., not grouped by families), the percentages of models capable of fitting >75% (19/25 subjects) of the panel were 29% and 32% for subjects achieving a fit factor ≥100 for at least one of the first two donnings and at least one of three donnings, respectively. When the models are evaluated grouped into families and using >75% of panel subjects achieving a fit factor ≥100 for at least one of two donnings as the PPR pass/fail criterion, 48% of all models can pass. When >50% (13/25 subjects) of panel subjects was the PPR criterion, the percentage of passing models increased to 70%. Testing respirators grouped into families and evaluating the first two donnings for each of two respirator sizes provided the best balance between meeting end user expectations and creating a performance bar for manufacturers. Specifying the test criterion for a subject obtaining acceptable fit as achieving a fit factor ≥100 on at least one out of the two donnings is reasonable because a majority of existing respirator families can achieve an PPR of >50% using this criterion. The different test criteria can be considered by standards development organizations when developing standards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fit test; N95 respirator; NIOSH-certified respirator; respirator fit capability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28278067      PMCID: PMC5702917          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1296233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  16 in total

1.  Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Christopher C Coffey; Paul A Jensen; Donald L Campbell; Robert B Lawrence; Warren R Myers
Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Bruce Bradtmiller; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Determining sample size and a passing criterion for respirator fit-test panels.

Authors:  D Landsittel; Z Zhuang; W Newcomb; R Berry Ann
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing.

Authors:  C C Coffey; D L Campbell; W R Myers; Z Zhuang
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1998-12

5.  Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part I--Protocol development.

Authors:  C C Coffey; D L Campbell; W R Myers; Z Zhuang; S Das
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1998-12

6.  Comparison of workplace protection factors for different biological contaminants.

Authors:  Kyungmin Jacob Cho; Tiina Reponen; Roy McKay; Alok Dwivedi; Atin Adhikari; Umesh Singh; Rakesh Shukla; Susan Jones; Gordon Jones; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  A must for NIOSH: certify fit performance of the half mask particulate respirator.

Authors:  Don J Lofgren
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Inward Leakage Variability between Respirator Fit Test Panels - Part I. Deterministic Approach.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Yuewei Liu; Christopher C Coffey; Colleen Miller; Jonathan Szalajda
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.

Authors:  Kiyoung Lee; Andrea Slavcev; Mark Nicas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Fitting characteristics of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators used widely in China.

Authors:  Yanyan Yu; Luman Jiang; Ziqing Zhuang; Yuewei Liu; Xinyan Wang; Juyuan Liu; Mingna Yang; Weihong Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of respirator fit capability test criteria for full-facepiece air-purifying respirators.

Authors:  Michael S Bergman; Ziging Zhuang; Susan Shuhong Xu; Samy Rengasamy; Robert B Lawrence; Brenda Boutin; James R Harris
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Comparison of filtration efficiency and respiratory resistance of COVID-19 protective masks by multi-national standards.

Authors:  Wenxia Wang; Tingting Chen; Zhen Li; Qiting Tan; Zhenbang Meng; Hailun Qiu; Xujie Liu; Junxia Zheng
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.303

3.  Quantitative Fit Test of a 3D Printed Frame Fitted Over a Surgical Mask: An Alternative Option to N95 Respirator.

Authors:  Suchada Kongkiatkamon; Norachai Wongkornchaowalit; Valailuck Kiatthanakorn; Somkiat Tonphu; Chaiyos Kunanusont
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-16

4.  Large-scale decontamination of disposable FFP2 and FFP3 respirators by hydrogen peroxide vapour, Finland, April to June 2020.

Authors:  Katri Laatikainen; Markku Mesilaakso; Ilpo Kulmala; Erja Mäkelä; Petri Ruutu; Outi Lyytikäinen; Susanna Tella; Tarmo Humppi; Satu Salo; Tuuli Haataja; Kristiina Helminen; Henri Karppinen; Heli Kähkönen; Tarja Vainiola; Kirsimarja Blomqvist; Sirpa Laitinen; Kati Peltonen; Marko Laaksonen; Timo Ristimäki; Jouni Koivisto
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2022-03

5.  The relationship between the filtering facepiece respirator fit and the facial anthropometric dimensions among Chinese people.

Authors:  Xueyan Zhang; Ning Jia; Zhongxu Wang
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.179

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.