Literature DB >> 26011282

Inward Leakage Variability between Respirator Fit Test Panels - Part I. Deterministic Approach.

Ziqing Zhuang1, Yuewei Liu1,2, Christopher C Coffey1, Colleen Miller1, Jonathan Szalajda1.   

Abstract

Inter-panel variability has never been investigated. The objective of this study was to determine the variability between different anthropometric panels used to determine the inward leakage (IL) of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) and elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHRs). A total of 144 subjects, who were both experienced and non-experienced N95 FFR users, were recruited. Five N95 FFRs and five N95 EHRs were randomly selected from among those models tested previously in our laboratory. The PortaCount Pro+ (without N95-Companion) was used to measure IL of the ambient particles with a detectable size range of 0.02 to 1 μm. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration standard fit test exercises were used for this study. IL test were performed for each subject using each of the 10 respirators. Each respirator/subject combination was tested in duplicate, resulting in a total 20 IL tests for each subject. Three 35-member panels were randomly selected without replacement from the 144 study subjects stratified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health bivariate panel cell for conducting statistical analyses. The geometric mean (GM) IL values for all 10 studied respirators were not significantly different among the three randomly selected 35-member panels. Passing rate was not significantly different among the three panels for all respirators combined or by each model. This was true for all IL pass/fail levels of 1%, 2%, and 5%. Using 26 or more subjects to pass the IL test, all three panels had consistent passing/failing results for pass/fail levels of 1% and 5%. Some disagreement was observed for the 2% pass/fail level. Inter-panel variability exists, but it is small relative to the other sources of variation in fit testing data. The concern about inter-panel variability and other types of variability can be alleviated by properly selecting: pass/fail level (IL 1-5%); panel size (e.g., 25 or 35); and minimum number of subjects required to pass (e.g., 26 of 35 or 23 of 35).

Entities:  

Keywords:  fit test; inter- and intra-subject variability; inter-panel variability; respirator fit test panel; respirators

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26011282      PMCID: PMC4664190          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1047025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  9 in total

1.  Respiratory protection as a function of respirator fitting characteristics and fit-test accuracy.

Authors:  D L Campbell; C C Coffey; S W Lenhart
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.

Authors:  Christopher C Coffey; Robert B Lawrence; Ziqing Zhuang; Donald L Campbell; Paul A Jensen; Warren R Myers
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2002-10

3.  Laboratory study to assess causative factors affecting temporal changes in filtering facepiece respirator fit: part I - pilot study.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Stacey Benson; Stephanie Lynch; Andy Palmiero; Raymond Roberge
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Head-and-face anthropometric survey of U.S. respirator users.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Bruce Bradtmiller
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Errors associated with three methods of assessing respirator fit.

Authors:  Christopher C Coffey; Robert B Lawrence; Ziqing Zhuang; Matthew G Duling; Donald L Campbell
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Bruce Bradtmiller; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Correlation between respirator fit and respirator fit test panel cells by respirator size.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Dennis Groce; Heinz W Ahlers; Wafik Iskander; Douglas Landsittel; Steve Guffey; Stacey Benson; Dennis Viscusi; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Determining sample size and a passing criterion for respirator fit-test panels.

Authors:  D Landsittel; Z Zhuang; W Newcomb; R Berry Ann
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Respirator protection factors: Part I -- Development of an anthropometric test panel.

Authors:  A L Hack; J T McConville
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1978-12
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Recommended test methods and pass/fail criteria for a respirator fit capability test of half-mask air-purifying respirators.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Michael Bergman; Zhipeng Lei; George Niezgoda; Ronald Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.155

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.