Literature DB >> 28273348

Performance evaluation of 18 F radioluminescence microscopy using computational simulation.

Qian Wang1, Debanti Sengupta1, Tae Jin Kim1, Guillem Pratx1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radioluminescence microscopy can visualize the distribution of beta-emitting radiotracers in live single cells with high resolution. Here, we perform a computational simulation of 18 F positron imaging using this modality to better understand how radioluminescence signals are formed and to assist in optimizing the experimental setup and image processing.
METHODS: First, the transport of charged particles through the cell and scintillator and the resulting scintillation is modeled using the GEANT4 Monte-Carlo simulation. Then, the propagation of the scintillation light through the microscope is modeled by a convolution with a depth-dependent point-spread function, which models the microscope response. Finally, the physical measurement of the scintillation light using an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera is modeled using a stochastic numerical photosensor model, which accounts for various sources of noise. The simulated output of the EMCCD camera is further processed using our ORBIT image reconstruction methodology to evaluate the endpoint images.
RESULTS: The EMCCD camera model was validated against experimentally acquired images and the simulated noise, as measured by the standard deviation of a blank image, was found to be accurate within 2% of the actual detection. Furthermore, point source simulations found that a reconstructed spatial resolution of 18.5 μm can be achieved near the scintillator. As the source is moved away from the scintillator, spatial resolution degrades at a rate of 3.5 μm per μm distance. These results agree well with the experimentally measured spatial resolution of 30-40 μm (live cells). The simulation also shows that the system sensitivity is 26.5%, which is also consistent with our previous experiments. Finally, an image of a simulated sparse set of single cells is visually similar to the measured cell image.
CONCLUSIONS: Our simulation methodology agrees with experimental measurements taken with radioluminescence microscopy. This in silico approach can be used to guide further instrumentation developments and to provide a framework for improving image reconstruction.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational simulation; imager performance evaluation; positron imaging; radioluminescence microscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28273348      PMCID: PMC5462448          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Modular platform for low-light microscopy.

Authors:  Tae Jin Kim; Silvan Tuerkcan; Andrew Ceballos; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Betabox: a beta particle imaging system based on a position sensitive avalanche photodiode.

Authors:  A A Dooraghi; N T Vu; R W Silverman; R Farrell; K S Shah; J Wang; J R Heath; A F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  14C autoradiography with an energy-sensitive silicon pixel detector.

Authors:  M Esposito; G Mettivier; P Russo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Enhancing spatial resolution of (18)F positron imaging with the Timepix detector by classification of primary fired pixels using support vector machine.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Zhen Liu; Sibylle I Ziegler; Kuangyu Shi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Two approximations for the geometric model of signal amplification in an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device detector.

Authors:  Jerry Chao; Sripad Ram; E Sally Ward; Raimund J Ober
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-02-22

6.  Single-Cell Characterization of 18F-FLT Uptake with Radioluminescence Microscopy.

Authors:  Debanti Sengupta; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Bright Lu2 O3 :Eu Thin-Film Scintillators for High-Resolution Radioluminescence Microscopy.

Authors:  Debanti Sengupta; Stuart Miller; Zsolt Marton; Frederick Chin; Vivek Nagarkar; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  A beta-camera integrated with a microfluidic chip for radioassays based on real-time imaging of glycolysis in small cell populations.

Authors:  Nam T Vu; Zeta T F Yu; Begonya Comin-Anduix; Jonas N Søndergaard; Robert W Silverman; Canny Y N Chang; Antoni Ribas; Hsian-Rong Tseng; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  The spatial resolution of silicon-based electron detectors in beta-autoradiography.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Kevin Wells
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Multiscale Framework for Imaging Radiolabeled Therapeutics.

Authors:  Arutselvan Natarajan; Silvan Türkcan; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  In silico optimization of radioluminescence microscopy.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Debanti Sengupta; Tae Jin Kim; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 2.  Radioluminescence in biomedicine: physics, applications, and models.

Authors:  Justin S Klein; Conroy Sun; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Microfluidics-Coupled Radioluminescence Microscopy for In Vitro Radiotracer Kinetic Studies.

Authors:  Tae Jin Kim; Byunghang Ha; Alison Dana Bick; Minkyu Kim; Sindy K Y Tang; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.