BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the ability of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiographically assess bone density in the wrist with sufficient accuracy to determine which patients require treatment for osteoporosis. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with unilateral distal radius fractures, 30 of whom were female, were included in this study. The mean age was 55 years (range 45 to 82). Standard radiographs of the fractured and normal wrists were taken. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was performed on the normal distal radius of all patients within 1 week of their injury. The radiographs were viewed in blinded randomized fashion on two separate occasions by three orthopaedic surgeons and once by a fourth. The participants were required to determine the presence of osteoporosis. Visual analog scales (VAS) were used to evaluate (1) porosity, (2) cortical thickness, (3) trabecular thickness, and (4) the number of trabeculae in the ultradistal radius. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement assessing osteoporosis averaged 81% (kappa of 0.5393). VAS assessment was unreliable for all four parameters. Radiographic determination of osteoporosis had a specificity of 61% and a sensitivity of 61% using x-rays of the uninjured wrist. CONCLUSION: We conclude that orthopaedic surgeons cannot predict with sufficient accuracy using plain x-rays whether a patient is significantly osteoporotic.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the ability of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiographically assess bone density in the wrist with sufficient accuracy to determine which patients require treatment for osteoporosis. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with unilateral distal radius fractures, 30 of whom were female, were included in this study. The mean age was 55 years (range 45 to 82). Standard radiographs of the fractured and normal wrists were taken. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was performed on the normal distal radius of all patients within 1 week of their injury. The radiographs were viewed in blinded randomized fashion on two separate occasions by three orthopaedic surgeons and once by a fourth. The participants were required to determine the presence of osteoporosis. Visual analog scales (VAS) were used to evaluate (1) porosity, (2) cortical thickness, (3) trabecular thickness, and (4) the number of trabeculae in the ultradistal radius. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement assessing osteoporosis averaged 81% (kappa of 0.5393). VAS assessment was unreliable for all four parameters. Radiographic determination of osteoporosis had a specificity of 61% and a sensitivity of 61% using x-rays of the uninjured wrist. CONCLUSION: We conclude that orthopaedic surgeons cannot predict with sufficient accuracy using plain x-rays whether a patient is significantly osteoporotic.
Authors: Andrew J Miller; Christopher Jones; Frederick Liss; Jack Abboudi; William Kirkpatrick; Pedro Beredjiklian Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg Date: 2017-01