Literature DB >> 28268333

Upper extremity prosthesis user perspectives on unmet needs and innovative technology.

Heather L Benz, Laura Rose, Okan Olgac, Karen Kreutz, Anindita Saha, Eugene F Civillico.   

Abstract

The needs of individuals with upper limb amputation and congenital limb difference are not being fully met by current prostheses, as evidenced by prosthesis rejection, non-wear, and user reports of pain and challenging activities. Emerging technologies such as dexterous sensorized robotic limbs, osseointegrated prostheses, implantable EMG electrodes, and electrical stimulation for sensory feedback have the potential to address unmet needs, but pose additional risks. We plan to assess upper limb prosthesis user needs and perspectives on these new benefits and risks using an extensive quantitative survey. In preparation for this survey, we report here on qualitative interviews with seven individuals with upper limb amputation or congenital limb difference. Unstructured text was mined using topic modeling and the results compared with identified themes. A more complete understanding of how novel technologies could address real user concerns will inform implementation of new technologies and regulatory decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28268333      PMCID: PMC5508653          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7590696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  13 in total

1.  The DEKA Arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Shana L Klinger; Katherine Etter
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Matthew Borgia; Gail Latlief; Nicole Sasson; Lisa Smurr-Walters
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

3.  Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses.

Authors:  Stanisa Raspopovic; Marco Capogrosso; Francesco Maria Petrini; Marco Bonizzato; Jacopo Rigosa; Giovanni Di Pino; Jacopo Carpaneto; Marco Controzzi; Tim Boretius; Eduardo Fernandez; Giuseppe Granata; Calogero Maria Oddo; Luca Citi; Anna Lisa Ciancio; Christian Cipriani; Maria Chiara Carrozza; Winnie Jensen; Eugenio Guglielmelli; Thomas Stieglitz; Paolo Maria Rossini; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs.

Authors:  Max Ortiz-Catalan; Bo Håkansson; Rickard Brånemark
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making.

Authors:  Martin P Ho; Juan Marcos Gonzalez; Herbert P Lerner; Carolyn Y Neuland; Joyce M Whang; Michelle McMurry-Heath; A Brett Hauber; Telba Irony
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland; Sandra L Hubbard Winkler; Allen W Heinemann; Melissa Jones; Alberto Esquenazi
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2010

7.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Jennifer L Collinger; Brian Wodlinger; John E Downey; Wei Wang; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Douglas J Weber; Angus J C McMorland; Meel Velliste; Michael L Boninger; Andrew B Schwartz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics.

Authors:  Elaine Biddiss; Dorcas Beaton; Tom Chau
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2007-11

9.  First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand.

Authors:  Paul F Pasquina; Melissa Evangelista; A J Carvalho; Joseph Lockhart; Sarah Griffin; George Nanos; Patricia McKay; Morten Hansen; Derek Ipsen; James Vandersea; Josef Butkus; Matthew Miller; Ian Murphy; David Hankin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Implant survival, adverse events, and bone remodeling of osseointegrated percutaneous implants for transhumeral amputees.

Authors:  Georgios Tsikandylakis; Örjan Berlin; Rickard Brånemark
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.

Authors:  Nienke Kerver; Sacha van Twillert; Bart Maas; Corry K van der Sluis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Hard-wired Epimysial Recordings from Normal and Reinnervated Muscle Using a Bone-anchored Device.

Authors:  Henry T Lancashire; Yazan Al Ajam; Robert P Dowling; Catherine J Pendegrass; Gordon W Blunn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-09-23

3.  A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users.

Authors:  Violet R Borkowska; Alistair McConnell; Sethu Vijayakumar; Adam Stokes; Aidan D Roche
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use.

Authors:  Ulrika Wijk; Ingela K Carlsson; Christian Antfolk; Anders Björkman; Birgitta Rosén
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.