Literature DB >> 24500407

Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses.

Stanisa Raspopovic1, Marco Capogrosso, Francesco Maria Petrini, Marco Bonizzato, Jacopo Rigosa, Giovanni Di Pino, Jacopo Carpaneto, Marco Controzzi, Tim Boretius, Eduardo Fernandez, Giuseppe Granata, Calogero Maria Oddo, Luca Citi, Anna Lisa Ciancio, Christian Cipriani, Maria Chiara Carrozza, Winnie Jensen, Eugenio Guglielmelli, Thomas Stieglitz, Paolo Maria Rossini, Silvestro Micera.   

Abstract

Hand loss is a highly disabling event that markedly affects the quality of life. To achieve a close to natural replacement for the lost hand, the user should be provided with the rich sensations that we naturally perceive when grasping or manipulating an object. Ideal bidirectional hand prostheses should involve both a reliable decoding of the user's intentions and the delivery of nearly "natural" sensory feedback through remnant afferent pathways, simultaneously and in real time. However, current hand prostheses fail to achieve these requirements, particularly because they lack any sensory feedback. We show that by stimulating the median and ulnar nerve fascicles using transversal multichannel intrafascicular electrodes, according to the information provided by the artificial sensors from a hand prosthesis, physiologically appropriate (near-natural) sensory information can be provided to an amputee during the real-time decoding of different grasping tasks to control a dexterous hand prosthesis. This feedback enabled the participant to effectively modulate the grasping force of the prosthesis with no visual or auditory feedback. Three different force levels were distinguished and consistently used by the subject. The results also demonstrate that a high complexity of perception can be obtained, allowing the subject to identify the stiffness and shape of three different objects by exploiting different characteristics of the elicited sensations. This approach could improve the efficacy and "life-like" quality of hand prostheses, resulting in a keystone strategy for the near-natural replacement of missing hands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24500407     DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  185 in total

Review 1.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Matthew Schiefer; Daniel Tan; Steven M Sidek; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Implantable neurotechnologies: bidirectional neural interfaces--applications and VLSI circuit implementations.

Authors:  Elliot Greenwald; Matthew R Masters; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications.

Authors:  Sudip Nag; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  System to induce and measure embodiment of an artificial hand with programmable convergent visual and tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Heather L Benz; Talia R Sieff; Mahsa Alborz; Kimberly Kontson; Elizabeth Kilpatrick; Eugene F Civillico
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

6.  Upper extremity prosthesis user perspectives on unmet needs and innovative technology.

Authors:  Heather L Benz; Laura Rose; Okan Olgac; Karen Kreutz; Anindita Saha; Eugene F Civillico
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

7.  Object stiffness recognition using haptic feedback delivered through transcutaneous proximal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; Henry Shin; He Helen Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Benoit P Delhaye; Matthew A Schiefer; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Illusory movement perception improves motor control for prosthetic hands.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Jacqueline S Hebert; Jon W Sensinger; Courtney E Shell; Jonathon S Schofield; Zachary C Thumser; Raviraj Nataraj; Dylan T Beckler; Michael R Dawson; Dan H Blustein; Satinder Gill; Brett D Mensh; Rafael Granja-Vazquez; Madeline D Newcomb; Jason P Carey; Beth M Orzell
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Evoked Haptic Sensation in the Hand With Concurrent Non-Invasive Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; Graham Whitehouse; He Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.