| Literature DB >> 28264646 |
Julia Minicka1, Santiago F Elena2,3,4, Natasza Borodynko-Filas1, Błażej Rubiś5, Beata Hasiów-Jaroszewska6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV) is an emerging plant pathogen that infects tomatoes worldwide. Understanding the factors that influence its evolutionary success is essential for developing new control strategies that may be more robust against the evolution of new viral strains. One of these evolutionary factors is the distribution of mutational fitness effect (DMFE), that is, the fraction of mutations that are lethal, deleterious, neutral, and beneficial on a given viral strain and host species. The goal of this study was to characterize the DMFE of introduced nonsynonymous mutations on a mild isolate of PepMV from the Chilean 2 strain (PepMV-P22). Additionally, we also explored whether the fitness effect of a given mutation depends on the gene where it appears or on epistatic interactions with the genetic background. To address this latter possibility, a subset of mutations were also introduced in a mild isolate of the European strain (PepMV-P11) and the fitness of the resulting clones measured.Entities:
Keywords: Epistasis; Mutational fitness effect; Pepino mosaic virus; Real-time quantitative PCR; Site-directed mutagenesis; Virus accumulation; Virus evolution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28264646 PMCID: PMC5339997 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0920-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
PepMV strains used in the study and changes in the genomes
| Strain | Isolate | Gene | Location in particular genea | Codon substitution | Amino acid change | Effectb |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH2 | P22 |
| 926 (309) | GTC-GAC | V-D | Beneficial | <0.0001 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 1647 (549) | GAC-CAC | D-H | Neutral | 0.0686 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 4192 (1398) | CAA-AAA | Q-K | Neutral | 0.1904 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 118 (40) | AGG-TGG | R-W | Neutral | 0.3804 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 235 (79) | GAC – CAC | D-H | Neutral | 0.0920 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 272 (91) | CCU-CAU | P-H | Neutral | 0.8217 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 431 (144) | GCA-GAA | A-E | Lethal | <0.0001 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 467 (156) | GCA-GAA | A-E | Lethal | <0.0001 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 130 (44) | AGA – GGA | R-G | Neutral | 0.0203 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 193 (65) | CAA-AAA | Q-K | Beneficial | <0.0001 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 310 (104) | CAT-TAT | H-Y | Beneficial | 0.0106 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 313 (105) | CAT-TAT | H-Y | Beneficial | 0.0004 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 50 (17) | ATA-AGA | I-R | Neutral | 0.0858 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 68 (23) | TTA-TCA | L-S | Neutral | 0.2530 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 175 (59) | TGT - CGT | C-R | Neutral | 0.0237 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 199 (67) | AAA- GAA | K-E | Neutral | 0.9274 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 397 (133) | CAG-AAG | Q-K | Beneficial | 0.0006 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 5 (2) | GAA-GCA | E-A | Deleterious | 0.0026 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 22 (8) | TCT-GCT | S-A | Neutral | 0.0113 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 26 (9) | AAC-AGC | N-S | Lethal | <0.0001 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 127 (43) | GTC-ATC | V-I | Neutral | 0.0420 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 233 (78) | GCC-GAC | A-D | Lethal | <0.0001 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 418 (140) | GAC-CAC | D-H | Neutral | 0.0827 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 463 (155) | GAA-AAA | E-K | Neutral | 0.0183 |
| CH2 | P22 |
| 497 (166) | GAT-GGT | D-G | Beneficial | 0.0029 |
| EU | P11 |
| 4192 (1398) | GAG-AAG | E-K | Neutral | 0.0607 |
| EU | P11 |
| 130 (44) | CGT-GGT | R-G | Neutral | 0.0292 |
| EU | P11 |
| 68 (23) | TTA-TCA | L-S | Neutral | 0.1023 |
| EU | P11 |
| 463 (155) | GAA-AAA | E-K | Deleterious | 0.0171 |
| EU | P11 |
| 497 (166) | GAT-GGT | D-G | Neutral | 0.6633 |
| EU | P11 |
| (155/166) | GAA-AAA | E-K | Beneficial | 0.0030 |
aFirst number indicates the genomic nucleotide position; number in parenthesis indicates the amino acid in the corresponding protein
bEffects were classified as beneficial, neutral or deleterious according to the result of the 2-samples t-tests comparing the fitness values obtained for each mutant to the values measured for the non-mutated parental virus. P-values are reported in the last column
Fig. 1Genome organization of PepMV and location of the single nucleotide substitutions introduced by site-directed mutagenesis
Fig. 2Fitness effects associated to each of the mutations listed in Table 1. Mutations have been ranked according to their effect. Error bars correspond to ±1 SEM
Results of the GLM analyses comparing fitness effects across two different PepMV strains (data in Fig. 2)
|
| d.f. |
|
| 1 − | % varianced | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 359.522 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.999 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 0.953 | 1 | 0.329 | 0.019 | 0.137 | 0 |
|
| 25.972 | 4 | <0.001 | 0.405 | 0.987 | 51.70 |
|
| 31.776 | 4 | <0.001 | 0.470 | 0.998 | 48.30 |
aThe likelihood ratio test statistic follows a χ 2 distribution
bPartial η 2 measuring the size of each effect when controlling for the other effects
cPower of the test
dBased on the maximum likelihood estimator of each component