Kawin Setsompop1,2, Qiuyun Fan1,2, Jason Stockmann1,2, Berkin Bilgic1,2, Susie Huang1,2, Stephen F Cauley1,2, Aapo Nummenmaa1,2, Fuyixue Wang1,3, Yogesh Rathi4, Thomas Witzel1,2, Lawrence L Wald1,2. 1. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Medical Engineering & Medical Physics, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop an efficient acquisition for high-resolution diffusion imaging and allow in vivo whole-brain acquisitions at 600- to 700-μm isotropic resolution. METHODS: We combine blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging simultaneous multislice (SMS) with a novel slab radiofrequency (RF) encoding gSlider (generalized slice-dithered enhanced resolution) to form a signal-to-noise ratio-efficient volumetric simultaneous multislab acquisition. Here, multiple thin slabs are acquired simultaneously with controlled aliasing, and unaliased with parallel imaging. To achieve high resolution in the slice direction, the slab is volumetrically encoded using RF encoding with a scheme similar to Hadamard encoding. However, with gSlider, the RF-encoding bases are specifically designed to be highly independent and provide high image signal-to-noise ratio in each slab acquisition to enable self-navigation of the diffusion's phase corruption. Finally, the method is combined with zoomed imaging (while retaining whole-brain coverage) to facilitate low-distortion single-shot in-plane encoding with echo-planar imaging at high resolution. RESULTS: A 10-slices-per-shot gSlider-SMS acquisition was used to acquire whole-brain data at 660 and 760 μm isotropic resolution with b-values of 1500 and 1800 s/mm2 , respectively. Data were acquired on the Connectome 3 Tesla scanner with 64-channel head coil. High-quality data with excellent contrast were achieved at these resolutions, which enable the visualization of fine-scale structures. CONCLUSIONS: The gSlider-SMS approach provides a new, efficient way to acquire high-resolution diffusion data. Magn Reson Med 79:141-151, 2018.
PURPOSE: To develop an efficient acquisition for high-resolution diffusion imaging and allow in vivo whole-brain acquisitions at 600- to 700-μm isotropic resolution. METHODS: We combine blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging simultaneous multislice (SMS) with a novel slab radiofrequency (RF) encoding gSlider (generalized slice-dithered enhanced resolution) to form a signal-to-noise ratio-efficient volumetric simultaneous multislab acquisition. Here, multiple thin slabs are acquired simultaneously with controlled aliasing, and unaliased with parallel imaging. To achieve high resolution in the slice direction, the slab is volumetrically encoded using RF encoding with a scheme similar to Hadamard encoding. However, with gSlider, the RF-encoding bases are specifically designed to be highly independent and provide high image signal-to-noise ratio in each slab acquisition to enable self-navigation of the diffusion's phase corruption. Finally, the method is combined with zoomed imaging (while retaining whole-brain coverage) to facilitate low-distortion single-shot in-plane encoding with echo-planar imaging at high resolution. RESULTS: A 10-slices-per-shot gSlider-SMS acquisition was used to acquire whole-brain data at 660 and 760 μm isotropic resolution with b-values of 1500 and 1800 s/mm2 , respectively. Data were acquired on the Connectome 3 Tesla scanner with 64-channel head coil. High-quality data with excellent contrast were achieved at these resolutions, which enable the visualization of fine-scale structures. CONCLUSIONS: The gSlider-SMS approach provides a new, efficient way to acquire high-resolution diffusion data. Magn Reson Med 79:141-151, 2018.
Authors: Felix A Breuer; Martin Blaimer; Robin M Heidemann; Matthias F Mueller; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Cornelius von Morze; Douglas A C Kelley; Timothy M Shepherd; Suchandrima Banerjee; Duan Xu; Christopher P Hess Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: S N Sotiropoulos; S Moeller; S Jbabdi; J Xu; J L Andersson; E J Auerbach; E Yacoub; D Feinberg; K Setsompop; L L Wald; T E J Behrens; K Ugurbil; C Lenglet Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Karla L Miller; Charlotte J Stagg; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Saad Jbabdi; Stephen M Smith; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark Jenkinson; Steven A Chance; Margaret M Esiri; Natalie L Voets; Ned Jenkinson; Tipu Z Aziz; Martin R Turner; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Jennifer A McNab Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Robert Frost; Peter Jezzard; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Stuart Clare; David A Porter; Karla L Miller Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Walter Koroshetz; Joshua Gordon; Amy Adams; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; James Churchill; Gregory Farber; Michelle Freund; Jim Gnadt; Nina S Hsu; Nicholas Langhals; Sarah Lisanby; Guoying Liu; Grace C Y Peng; Khara Ramos; Michael Steinmetz; Edmund Talley; Samantha White Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Soudabeh Kargar; Eric A Borisch; Adam T Froemming; Roger C Grimm; Akira Kawashima; Bernard F King; Eric G Stinson; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-05-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Omer F Gulban; Federico De Martino; An T Vu; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Uğurbil; Christophe Lenglet Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Congyu Liao; Jason Stockmann; Qiyuan Tian; Berkin Bilgic; Nicolas S Arango; Mary Kate Manhard; Susie Y Huang; William A Grissom; Lawrence L Wald; Kawin Setsompop Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.668