Literature DB >> 28258771

Acoustic Behavior of Halobacterium salinarum Gas Vesicles in the High-Frequency Range: Experiments and Modeling.

Emmanuel Cherin1, Johan M Melis2, Raymond W Bourdeau3, Melissa Yin4, Dennis M Kochmann5, F Stuart Foster6, Mikhail G Shapiro3.   

Abstract

Gas vesicles (GVs) are a new and unique class of biologically derived ultrasound contrast agents with sub-micron size whose acoustic properties have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we investigated the acoustic collapse pressure and behavior of Halobacterium salinarum gas vesicles at transmit center frequencies ranging from 12.5 to 27.5 MHz. The acoustic collapse pressure was found to be above 550 kPa at all frequencies, nine-fold higher than the critical pressure observed under hydrostatic conditions. We illustrate that gas vesicles behave non-linearly when exposed to ultrasound at incident pressure ranging from 160 kPa to the collapse pressure and generate second harmonic amplitudes of -2 to -6 dB below the fundamental in media with viscosities ranging from 0.89 to 8 mPa·s. Simulations performed using a Rayleigh-Plesset-type model accounting for buckling and a dynamic finite-element analysis suggest that buckling is the mechanism behind the generation of harmonics. We found good agreement between the level of second harmonic relative to the fundamental measured at 20 MHz and the Rayleigh-Plesset model predictions. Finite-element simulations extended these findings to a non-spherical geometry, confirmed that the acoustic buckling pressure corresponds to the critical pressure under hydrostatic conditions and support the hypothesis of limited gas flow across the GV shell during the compression phase in the frequency range investigated. From simulations, estimates of GV bandwidth-limited scattering indicate that a single GV has a scattering cross section comparable to that of a red blood cell. These findings will inform the development of GV-based contrast agents and pulse sequences to optimize their detection with ultrasound.
Copyright © 2017 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buckling; Contrast agent; High-frequency ultrasound; Modeling; Submicron gas vesicles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258771      PMCID: PMC5385285          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  12 in total

1.  Investigation of the effects of microbubble shell disruption on population scattering and implications for modeling contrast agent behavior.

Authors:  Chien Ting Chien; Peter N Burns
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Distribution of blood viscosity values and biochemical correlates in healthy adults.

Authors:  R S Rosenson; A McCormick; E F Uretz
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue.

Authors:  Xinmai Yang; Charles C Church
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles.

Authors:  Peter D Bevan; Raffi Karshafian; Peter N Burns
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Anisotropic colloids through non-trivial buckling.

Authors:  C Quilliet; C Zoldesi; C Riera; A van Blaaderen; A Imhof
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.890

6.  Silk as a Biomaterial.

Authors:  Charu Vepari; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 29.190

7.  Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound.

Authors:  Philippe Marmottant; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Catherine Quilliet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Distribution, formation and regulation of gas vesicles.

Authors:  Felicitas Pfeifer
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 9.  Tumor physiology and delivery of nanopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Robert B Campbell
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  Biogenic gas nanostructures as ultrasonic molecular reporters.

Authors:  Mikhail G Shapiro; Patrick W Goodwill; Arkosnato Neogy; Melissa Yin; F Stuart Foster; David V Schaffer; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  14 in total

1.  Molecular Engineering of Acoustic Protein Nanostructures.

Authors:  Anupama Lakshmanan; Arash Farhadi; Suchita P Nety; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Raymond W Bourdeau; David Maresca; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  In vivo Biodistribution of Radiolabeled Acoustic Protein Nanostructures.

Authors:  Johann Le Floc'h; Aimen Zlitni; Holly A Bilton; Melissa Yin; Arash Farhadi; Nancy R Janzen; Mikhail G Shapiro; John F Valliant; F Stuart Foster
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Ultrasound Technologies for Imaging and Modulating Neural Activity.

Authors:  Claire Rabut; Sangjin Yoo; Robert C Hurt; Zhiyang Jin; Hongyi Li; Hongsun Guo; Bill Ling; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Going Deeper: Biomolecular Tools for Acoustic and Magnetic Imaging and Control of Cellular Function.

Authors:  Dan I Piraner; Arash Farhadi; Hunter C Davis; Di Wu; David Maresca; Jerzy O Szablowski; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Biomolecular Ultrasound and Sonogenetics.

Authors:  David Maresca; Anupama Lakshmanan; Mohamad Abedi; Avinoam Bar-Zion; Arash Farhadi; George J Lu; Jerzy O Szablowski; Di Wu; Sangjin Yoo; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 11.059

6.  Acoustics at the nanoscale (nanoacoustics): A comprehensive literature review.: Part II: Nanoacoustics for biomedical imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Chang Peng; Mengyue Chen; James B Spicer; Xiaoning Jiang
Journal:  Sens Actuators A Phys       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.407

Review 7.  Ultrasound-Responsive Systems as Components for Smart Materials.

Authors:  Athanasios G Athanassiadis; Zhichao Ma; Nicolas Moreno-Gomez; Kai Melde; Eunjin Choi; Rahul Goyal; Peer Fischer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 8.  Proteins, air and water: reporter genes for ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  George J Lu; Arash Farhadi; Arnab Mukherjee; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Preparation of biogenic gas vesicle nanostructures for use as contrast agents for ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  Anupama Lakshmanan; George J Lu; Arash Farhadi; Suchita P Nety; Martin Kunth; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; David Maresca; Raymond W Bourdeau; Melissa Yin; Judy Yan; Christopher Witte; Dina Malounda; F Stuart Foster; Leif Schröder; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 10.  Genetically encodable materials for non-invasive biological imaging.

Authors:  Arash Farhadi; Felix Sigmund; Gil Gregor Westmeyer; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 43.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.