Literature DB >> 28255937

How Biomechanical Improvements in Running Economy Could Break the 2-hour Marathon Barrier.

Wouter Hoogkamer1, Rodger Kram2, Christopher J Arellano3.   

Abstract

A sub-2-hour marathon requires an average velocity (5.86 m/s) that is 2.5% faster than the current world record of 02:02:57 (5.72 m/s) and could be accomplished with a 2.7% reduction in the metabolic cost of running. Although supporting body weight comprises the majority of the metabolic cost of running, targeting the costs of forward propulsion and leg swing are the most promising strategies for reducing the metabolic cost of running and thus improving marathon running performance. Here, we calculate how much time could be saved by taking advantage of unconventional drafting strategies, a consistent tailwind, a downhill course, and specific running shoe design features while staying within the current International Association of Athletic Federations regulations for record purposes. Specifically, running in shoes that are 100 g lighter along with second-half scenarios of four runners alternately leading and drafting, or a tailwind of 6.0 m/s, combined with a 42-m elevation drop could result in a time well below the 2-hour marathon barrier.

Keywords:  Ethylene Vinyl Acetate; Metabolic Cost; Support Body Weight; World Record

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28255937     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0708-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  60 in total

1.  No effect of 5% hypohydration on running economy of competitive runners at 23 degrees C.

Authors:  Lawrence E Armstrong; Michael J Whittlesey; Douglas J Casa; Tabatha A Elliott; Stavros A Kavouras; Nicole R Keith; Carl M Maresh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  The fastest runner on artificial legs: different limbs, similar function?

Authors:  Peter G Weyand; Matthew W Bundle; Craig P McGowan; Alena Grabowski; Mary Beth Brown; Rodger Kram; Hugh Herr
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-06-18

3.  Aerobic responses of female distance runners to submaximal and maximal exercise.

Authors:  J Daniels; G Krahenbuhl; C Foster; J Gilbert; S Daniels
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Oxygen cost of exercise hyperpnea: measurement.

Authors:  E A Aaron; B D Johnson; C K Seow; J A Dempsey
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1992-05

5.  Mathematical analysis of running performance and world running records.

Authors:  F Péronnet; G Thibault
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1989-07

6.  The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces.

Authors:  L G Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Critical Power: An Important Fatigue Threshold in Exercise Physiology.

Authors:  David C Poole; Mark Burnley; Anni Vanhatalo; Harry B Rossiter; Andrew M Jones
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Impact of environmental parameters on marathon running performance.

Authors:  Nour El Helou; Muriel Tafflet; Geoffroy Berthelot; Julien Tolaini; Andy Marc; Marion Guillaume; Christophe Hausswirth; Jean-François Toussaint
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  One hundred and fifty years of sprint and distance running - Past trends and future prospects.

Authors:  Martin Weiss; Alexandra Newman; Ceri Whitmore; Stephan Weiss
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.050

10.  Mechanical determinants of the minimum energy cost of gradient running in humans.

Authors:  A E Minetti; L P Ardigò; F Saibene
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Energetics and Biomechanics of Running Footwear with Increased Longitudinal Bending Stiffness: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Justin A Ortega; Laura A Healey; Wannes Swinnen; Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Author's Reply to Candau et al.: Comment on: "How Biomechanical Improvements in Running Economy Could Break the 2-Hour Marathon Barrier".

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram; Christopher J Arellano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Comment on: "How Biomechanical Improvements in Running Economy Could Break the 2-Hour Marathon Barrier".

Authors:  Robin B Candau; Anthony M J Sanchez; Fabio Borrani; Alberto E Minetti
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Modeling the Benefits of Cooperative Drafting: Is There an Optimal Strategy to Facilitate a Sub-2-Hour Marathon Performance?

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Kristine L Snyder; Christopher J Arellano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Reflecting on Eliud Kipchoge's Marathon World Record: An Update to Our Model of Cooperative Drafting and Its Potential for a Sub-2-Hour Performance.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Kristine L Snyder; Christopher J Arellano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  A New Direction to Athletic Performance: Understanding the Acute and Longitudinal Responses to Backward Running.

Authors:  Aaron Uthoff; Jon Oliver; John Cronin; Craig Harrison; Paul Winwood
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  State of Knowledge on Molecular Adaptations to Exercise in Humans: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kaleen M Lavin; Paul M Coen; Liliana C Baptista; Margaret B Bell; Devin Drummer; Sara A Harper; Manoel E Lixandrão; Jeremy S McAdam; Samia M O'Bryan; Sofhia Ramos; Lisa M Roberts; Rick B Vega; Bret H Goodpaster; Marcas M Bamman; Thomas W Buford
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 8.915

8.  A Randomized Crossover Study Investigating the Running Economy of Highly-Trained Male and Female Distance Runners in Marathon Racing Shoes versus Track Spikes.

Authors:  Kyle R Barnes; Andrew E Kilding
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Effect of Advanced Shoe Technology on the Evolution of Road Race Times in Male and Female Elite Runners.

Authors:  Stéphane Bermon; Frédéric Garrandes; Andras Szabo; Imre Berkovics; Paolo Emilio Adami
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-04-22

10.  Marathon race performance increases the amount of particulate matter deposited in the respiratory system of runners: an incentive for "clean air marathon runs".

Authors:  Jerzy A Zoladz; Zenon Nieckarz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.