Literature DB >> 33830444

Energetics and Biomechanics of Running Footwear with Increased Longitudinal Bending Stiffness: A Narrative Review.

Justin A Ortega1, Laura A Healey1, Wannes Swinnen2, Wouter Hoogkamer3.   

Abstract

In the wake of the quest to break the 2-h marathon barrier, carbon-fiber plates have become commonplace in marathon racing shoes. Despite the controversy surrounding this shoe technology, studies on the effects of increased longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy report mixed results. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the current literature on midsole bending stiffness and carbon-fiber plates in distance running shoes, focusing on how longitudinal bending stiffness affects running energetics and lower limb mechanics. The current literature reports changes in running economy with increased longitudinal bending stiffness ranging from ~ 3% deterioration to ~ 3% improvement. In some studies, larger improvements have been observed, but often those shoes varied in many aspects, not just longitudinal bending stiffness. Biomechanically, increased longitudinal bending stiffness has the largest impact on metatarsal-phalangeal (MTP) and ankle joint mechanics. Plate location [top loaded (an insole), embedded (in between midsole foam), and bottom loaded (along the bottom of the shoe)] and geometry (flat/curved) affect joint moments and angular velocities at the MTP and ankle joint differently, which partly explains the mixed running economy results. Further research investigating how carbon-fiber plates interact with other footwear features (such as foam and midsole geometry), scaling of those with shoe size, body mass, and strike pattern, and comparing various plate placements is needed to better understand how longitudinal bending stiffness affects running economy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33830444     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01406-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  38 in total

1.  Running economy, mechanics, and marathon racing shoes.

Authors:  Iain Hunter; Aubree McLeod; Dru Valentine; Tyler Low; Jared Ward; Ron Hager
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 2.  The effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners.

Authors:  Joel T Fuller; Clint R Bellenger; Dominic Thewlis; Margarita D Tsiros; Jonathan D Buckley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The Biomechanics of Competitive Male Runners in Three Marathon Racing Shoes: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Shalaya Kipp; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better?

Authors:  Jason R Franz; Corbyn M Wierzbinski; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Altered Running Economy Directly Translates to Altered Distance-Running Performance.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Shalaya Kipp; Barry A Spiering; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Is it the shoes? A simple proposal for regulating footwear in road running.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Burns; Nicholas Tam
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Physiology and fast marathons.

Authors:  Michael J Joyner; Sandra K Hunter; Alejandro Lucia; Andrew M Jones
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-01-16

8.  A Randomized Crossover Study Investigating the Running Economy of Highly-Trained Male and Female Distance Runners in Marathon Racing Shoes versus Track Spikes.

Authors:  Kyle R Barnes; Andrew E Kilding
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Shalaya Kipp; Jesse H Frank; Emily M Farina; Geng Luo; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  A Pragmatic Approach to Resolving Technological Unfairness: the Case of Nike's Vaporfly and Alphafly Running Footwear.

Authors:  Bryce Dyer
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2020-05-24
View more
  7 in total

1.  Individual physiological responses to changes in shoe bending stiffness: a cluster analysis study on 96 runners.

Authors:  Mickael Chollet; Samuel Michelet; Nicolas Horvais; Sebastien Pavailler; Marlene Giandolini
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Can We Quantify the Benefits of "Super Spikes" in Track Running?

Authors:  Laura Healey; Montgomery Bertschy; Shalaya Kipp; Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 3.  Running Injury Paradigms and Their Influence on Footwear Design Features and Runner Assessment Methods: A Focused Review to Advance Evidence-Based Practice for Running Medicine Clinicians.

Authors:  Cristine Agresta; Christina Giacomazzi; Mark Harrast; Jessica Zendler
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-09

4.  Foot and Lower Limb Clinical and Structural Changes in Overuse Injured Recreational Runners Using Floating Heel Shoes: Preliminary Results of a Randomised Control Trial.

Authors:  Javier Gamez-Paya; Lirios Dueñas; Anna Arnal-Gómez; Josep Carles Benítez-Martínez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Longitudinal bending stiffness does not affect running economy in Nike Vaporfly Shoes.

Authors:  Laura A Healey; Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 13.077

6.  Metabolic cost of level, uphill, and downhill running in highly cushioned shoes with carbon-fiber plates.

Authors:  Clarissa S Whiting; Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 13.077

7.  Effects of footwear with different longitudinal bending stiffness on biomechanical characteristics and muscular mechanics of lower limbs in adolescent runners.

Authors:  Hairong Chen; Enze Shao; Dong Sun; Rongrong Xuan; Julien S Baker; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.