Literature DB >> 28251270

Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: Is it Time for a Change?

Jonathan B Yuval1, Ido Mizrahi2, Haggi Mazeh2, Daniel J Weiss2, Gidon Almogy2, Miklosh Bala2, Eran Kuchuk2, Baha Siam2, Natalia Simanovsky3, Ahmed Eid2, Alon J Pikarsky2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the advantages and limitations of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in a tertiary center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to our institution with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) between January 2003 and December of 2012 was performed. Data collected included patient demographics and comorbidities, presenting symptoms, laboratory findings, imaging results, length of stay (LOS), time to surgery, and surgical complications.
RESULTS: A total of 1078 patients were admitted with ACC. There were 593 females (55%), and the mean age was 57 ± 0.6 years. Mean LOS at initial admission, re-admission until surgery, and following surgery was 7.9 ± 0.2, 1.5 ± 0.1, and 3.4 ± 0.2 days, respectively. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) tube was inserted in 24% of the patients. Only 640 (59%) patients eventually underwent LC. Mean time to surgery was 97 ± 9.8 days, and 16.4% of patients were readmitted in this time period resulting in a mean total LOS of 10.6 ± 0.2 days. Conversion rate to open surgery was 5.8% and bile duct injury occurred in 1.1%. Postoperative complications occurred in 9.8% of the patients, and 30-day mortality was 0.6%. Patients with more severe inflammation according to Tokyo Criteria grade were more likely to undergo PC, were more likely to be readmitted while waiting for LC, and also had more postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Delayed LC is associated with significant loss of follow-up, long LOS, and higher than expected use of PC. Conversion rates are lower than in the literature while rates of bile duct injury and mortality are comparable. We believe these data as well as the available literature are sufficient to change our hospital policy regarding the surgical treatment of ACC from delayed to early same admission surgery in appropriate cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28251270     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3928-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304).

Authors:  Carsten N Gutt; Jens Encke; Jörg Köninger; Julian-Camill Harnoss; Kilian Weigand; Karl Kipfmüller; Oliver Schunter; Thorsten Götze; Markus T Golling; Markus Menges; Ernst Klar; Katharina Feilhauer; Wolfram G Zoller; Karsten Ridwelski; Sven Ackmann; Alexandra Baron; Michael R Schön; Helmut K Seitz; Dietmar Daniel; Wolfgang Stremmel; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S B Kolla; S Aggarwal; A Kumar; R Kumar; S Chumber; R Parshad; V Seenu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Tamim Siddiqui; Alisdair MacDonald; Peter S Chong; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Application of a novel severity grading system for surgical complications after colorectal resection.

Authors:  Haggi Mazeh; Yacov Samet; Bassam Abu-Wasel; Nahum Beglaibter; Ronit Grinbaum; Tzeela Cohen; Meir Pinto; Tamar Hamburger; Herbert R Freund; Aviram Nissan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Gurusamy; K Samraj; C Gluud; E Wilson; B R Davidson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; Zhanzhi Zhang; Yan Wang; Ke Gong; Yiping Lu; Nengwei Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Ten-year trend in the national volume of bile duct injuries requiring operative repair.

Authors:  J P Dolan; B S Diggs; B C Sheppard; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter?

Authors:  E Melloul; A Denys; N Demartines; J-M Calmes; M Schäfer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy is safe and effective option for acute calculous cholecystitis in select group of high-risk patients.

Authors:  M Bala; I Mizrahi; H Mazeh; J Yuval; A Eid; G Almogy
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Operative outcome and patient satisfaction in early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Aly Saber; Emad N Hokkam
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2014-08-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  The impact of delayed source control and antimicrobial therapy in 196 patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock: a cohort analysis

Authors:  Constantine J. Karvellas; Victor Dong; Juan G. Abraldes; Erica L.W. Lester; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Characteristics and outcome of elderly patients admitted for acute Cholecystitis to medical or surgical wards.

Authors:  Itamar Feldman; Lena Feldman; Dvorah S Shapiro; Gabriel Munter; Amos M Yinnon; Reuven Friedman
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2020-08-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.