Literature DB >> 15920680

Ten-year trend in the national volume of bile duct injuries requiring operative repair.

J P Dolan1, B S Diggs, B C Sheppard, J G Hunter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine the national proportions and mortality rate for bile duct injuries resulting from laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) that required operative reconstruction for repair over a 10-year period and to investigate the major factors associated with the mortality rate in this group of patients.
METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) of >7 million patient records per year, we extracted and analyzed data for LC during the years 1990-2000. Procedures that involved biliary reconstructions performed as part of another primary procedure were excluded. Using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), we used procedure-specific codes that enabled us to calculate national estimates for LC for the time period under review. We then calculated biliary reconstruction procedures that occurred after LC for this cohort of patients. Finally, we analyzed in-hospital mortality, as well as the patient, institutional, and outcome characteristics associated with biliary reconstructions.
RESULTS: The percentage of cholecystectomies performed laparoscopically has increased over the years for which data are available (from 52% in 1991 to 75% in 2000). Despite this increase, the mortality rate for this group of patients has remained consistently low over the study period (mean, 0.45%; range 0.33-0.58%). Within this group of patients, the average rate of bile duct injuries requiring operative repair was 0.15% for the years under study. The reconstruction rates ranged from 0.25% in 1992 to 0.09% in 1999. For 2000, the most recent year for which data are available, biliary reconstruction was performed in 0.10% of all patients who underwent LC. The average mortality rate for patients undergoing biliary reconstruction for the years 1991 to 2000 was 4.5%. After multivariate analysis, age, African American ethnicity, type of admission, source of admission, and hospital location, and teaching status were all found to correlate significantly with death after-biliary reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show an increase in the percentage of cholecystectomies performed laparoscopically over the years under study and an associated low mortality rate. In contrast, although the number of bile duct injuries appears to be decreasing, these procedures continue to be associated with a significant mortality rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15920680     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8942-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Patricia A Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cost, cause, and consequences.

Authors:  K A Kern
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-04

3.  Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  D Boerma; E A Rauws; Y C Keulemans; J J Bergman; H Obertop; K Huibregtse; D J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Risk factors for bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 49 cases.

Authors:  F P Schol; P M Go; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error?

Authors:  D R Flum; T Koepsell; P Heagerty; M Sinanan; E P Dellinger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-11

6.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster.

Authors:  S J Savader; K D Lillemoe; C A Prescott; A B Winick; A C Venbrux; G B Lund; S E Mitchell; J L Cameron; F A Osterman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Management of major bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T N Robinson; G V Stiegmann; J D Durham; S I Johnson; M E Wachs; A D Serra; D A Kumpe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Cancer statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993. A statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.

Authors:  J C Russell; S J Walsh; A S Mattie; J T Lynch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-04
View more
  36 in total

1.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Unusual cause of cholangitis and diarrhoea after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Venkata Lekharaju; Javaid Iqbal; Omar Noorullah; Richard Sturgess
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-03-08

3.  Major bile duct injury requiring operative reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a follow-on study.

Authors:  Patrick J Worth; Taranjeet Kaur; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of AITS laparoscopic training center on surgeons' preference for appendectomy.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Shih-Horng Tseng; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chih-Hung Hsu; Dev-Aur Chou; Hurng-Sheng Wu; Min-Ho Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [Surgical treatment of benign lesions and strictures of the bile ducts].

Authors:  J Y Tracey; A R Moossa
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Is the routine use of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy really the key to lowering bile duct injuries?

Authors:  Giuseppe Spinoglio; Alessandra Marano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The national mortality burden and significant factors associated with open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 1997-2006.

Authors:  James P Dolan; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Medicolegal costs of bile duct injuries incurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pankaj G Roy; Zahir F Soonawalla; Hugh W Grant
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures.

Authors:  Tarun Rustagi; Priya A Jamidar
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-01

10.  Epidemiological study of provision of cholecystectomy in England from 2000 to 2009: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics.

Authors:  Sidhartha Sinha; David Hofman; David L Stoker; Peter J Friend; Jan D Poloniecki; Matt M Thompson; Peter J E Holt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.