Literature DB >> 21520901

Photochemical modeling of the Ozark isoprene volcano: MEGAN, BEIS, and their impacts on air quality predictions.

Annmarie G Carlton1, Kirk R Baker.   

Abstract

Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) contribute substantially to atmospheric carbon, exerting influence on air quality and climate. Two widely used models, the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) and the Biogenic Emission Inventory System (BEIS) are employed to generate emissions for application in the CMAQ air quality model. Predictions of isoprene, monoterpenes, ozone, formaldehyde, and secondary organic carbon (SOC) are compared to surface and aloft measurements made during an intensive study in the Ozarks, a large isoprene emitting region. MEGAN and BEIS predict spatially similar emissions but magnitudes differ. The total VOC reactivity of the emissions, as developed for the CB05 gas-phase chemical mechanism, is a factor of 2 different between the models. Isoprene estimates by CMAQ-MEGAN are higher and more variable than surface and aloft measurements, whereas CMAQ-BEIS predictions are lower. CMAQ ozone predictions are similar and compare well with measurements using either MEGAN or BEIS. However, CMAQ-MEGAN overpredicts formaldehyde. CMAQ-BEIS SOC predictions are lower than observational estimates for every sample. CMAQ-MEGAN underpredicts SOC ∼ 80% of the time, despite overprediction of precursor VOCs. CMAQ-MEGAN isoprene predictions improve when prognostically predicted solar radiation is replaced with the GEWEX satellite product. CMAQ-BEIS does not exhibit similar photosensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21520901     DOI: 10.1021/es200050x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

Review 1.  Reflecting on progress since the 2005 NARSTO emissions inventory report.

Authors:  Melissa Day; George Pouliot; Sherri Hunt; Kirk R Baker; Megan Beardsley; Gregory Frost; David Mobley; Heather Simon; Barron B Henderson; Tiffany Yelverton; Venkatesh Rao
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Meteorological and Air Quality Modeling for Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.

Authors:  K R Baker; T K V Nguyen; N Sareen; B H Henderson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements.

Authors:  Kirk R Baker; Matthew C Woody
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning.

Authors:  Benjamin N Murphy; Matthew C Woody; Jose L Jimenez; Ann Marie G Carlton; Patrick L Hayes; Shang Liu; Nga L Ng; Lynn M Russell; Ari Setyan; Lu Xu; Jeff Young; Rahul A Zaveri; Qi Zhang; Havala O T Pye
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

5.  Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen oxides.

Authors:  Ying-Hsuan Lin; Haofei Zhang; Havala O T Pye; Zhenfa Zhang; Wendy J Marth; Sarah Park; Maiko Arashiro; Tianqu Cui; Sri Hapsari Budisulistiorini; Kenneth G Sexton; William Vizuete; Ying Xie; Deborah J Luecken; Ivan R Piletic; Edward O Edney; Libero J Bartolotti; Avram Gold; Jason D Surratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  CAMx Ozone Source Attribution in the Eastern United States using Guidance from Observations during DISCOVER-AQ Maryland.

Authors:  Daniel L Goldberg; Timothy P Vinciguerra; Daniel C Anderson; Linda Hembeck; Timothy P Canty; Sheryl H Ehrman; Douglas K Martins; Ryan M Stauffer; Anne M Thompson; Ross J Salawitch; Russell R Dickerson
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.720

7.  Formaldehyde production from isoprene oxidation across NOx regimes.

Authors:  G M Wolfe; J Kaiser; T F Hanisco; F N Keutsch; J A de Gouw; J B Gilman; M Graus; C D Hatch; J Holloway; L W Horowitz; B H Lee; B M Lerner; F Lopez-Hilifiker; J Mao; M R Marvin; J Peischl; I B Pollack; J M Roberts; T B Ryerson; J A Thornton; P R Veres; C Warneke
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.133

8.  Southeast Atmosphere Studies: learning from model-observation syntheses.

Authors:  Jingqiu Mao; Annmarie Carlton; Ronald C Cohen; William H Brune; Steven S Brown; Glenn M Wolfe; Jose L Jimenez; Havala O T Pye; Nga Lee Ng; Lu Xu; V Faye McNeill; Kostas Tsigaridis; Brian C McDonald; Carsten Warneke; Alex Guenther; Matthew J Alvarado; Joost de Gouw; Loretta J Mickley; Eric M Leibensperger; Rohit Mathur; Christopher G Nolte; Robert W Portmann; Nadine Unger; Mika Tosca; Larry W Horowitz
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.133

9.  On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass.

Authors:  Havala O T Pye; Benjamin N Murphy; Lu Xu; Nga L Ng; Annmarie G Carlton; Hongyu Guo; Rodney Weber; Petros Vasilakos; K Wyat Appel; Sri Hapsari Budisulistiorini; Jason D Surratt; Athanasios Nenes; Weiwei Hu; Jose L Jimenez; Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz; Pawel K Misztal; Allen H Goldstein
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

10.  Chemical transport model simulations of organic aerosol in southern California: model evaluation and gasoline and diesel source contributions.

Authors:  Shantanu H Jathar; Matthew Woody; Havala O T Pye; Kirk R Baker; Allen L Robinson
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 6.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.