Literature DB >> 28246895

Mastoidectomy dimensions for direct acoustic cochlear implantation: a human cadaveric temporal bone study.

Francesco Fiorino1, Maurizio Amadori2.   

Abstract

The objective of the present paper was to acquire information about the mastoidectomy size necessary to obtain an optimal placement of the direct acoustic cochlear implant actuator and fixation system. Ten human cadaveric temporal bones were dissected and implanted with direct acoustic cochlear implant. Mastoidectomy size was determined after implantation in each temporal bone. A bone bed for the receiver/stimulator, mastoidectomy and a large posterior tympanotomy were drilled out. The mastoidectomy was progressively enlarged posteriorly in small steps until the actuator template was judged adequately oriented to enable passage of the rod through the posterior tympanotomy without any contact with the bony walls. The distance between different landmarks in the mastoidectomy was measured. All measured values showed a high degree of consistency, with limited median absolute deviation values. One of the most critical measure, i.e. the distance between the posterior margin of the mastoidectomy to the superior rim of the bony external ear canal wall, ranged from 13 to 16 mm with a median value of 15 mm. Prior knowledge of the ideal size of the mastoidectomy for direct acoustic cochlear implant facilitates the positioning of the fixation system and may save time during implant surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active middle ear implant; Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation; Mastoidectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28246895     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4504-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  7 in total

1.  The Otologics MET ossicular stimulator.

Authors:  J F Kasic; J M Fredrickson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Design of a semi-implantable hearing device for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  Hans Bernhard; Christof Stieger; Yves Perriard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Indication of direct acoustical cochlea stimulation in comparison to cochlear implants.

Authors:  Eugen Kludt; Andreas Büchner; Burkard Schwab; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Vibroplasty for mixed and conductive hearing loss.

Authors:  Jan Christoffer Luers; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink; Thomas Zahnert; Matthias Bornitz; Dirk Beutner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Nicolas Verhaert; Christian Desloovere; Jolien Desmet; Christiane D'hondt; Juan Carlos Falcón González; Eugen Kludt; Angel Ramos Macías; Henryk Skarżyński; Paul Van de Heyning; Caroline Vyncke; Arkadiusz Wasowski
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Multicenter study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Joost W Zwartenkot; Christof Stieger; Burkard Schwab; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis; Ad F M Snik; Christiane D'hondt; Hamidreza Mojallal
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  Rudolf Häusler; Christof Stieger; Hans Bernhard; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 1.854

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.