Literature DB >> 26836967

Indication of direct acoustical cochlea stimulation in comparison to cochlear implants.

Eugen Kludt1, Andreas Büchner2, Burkard Schwab2, Thomas Lenarz2, Hannes Maier2.   

Abstract

The new implantable hearing system Codacs™ was designed to close the treatment gap between active middle ear implants and cochlear implants in cases of severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss. The Codacs™ actuator is attached to conventional stapes prosthesis during the implantation and thereby provides acoustical stimulation through a stapedotomy to the cochlea. Cochlear implants (CIs) on the other hand are an established treatment option for profoundly deaf patients including mixed hearing losses that are possible candidates for the Codacs™. In this retrospective study, we compared the clinical outcome of 25 patients with the Codacs™ (≥3 month post-activation) to 54 CI patients (two years post-activation) with comparable pre-operative bone conduction (BC) thresholds that were potential candidates for both categories of devices. The word recognition score (Freiburg monosyllables test) in quiet was significantly (p < 0.05) better in the Codacs™ than in the corresponding CI patients for average pre-operative bone conduction below 60 dB HL and equal in patients with a pre-operative BC PTA between 60 and 70 dB HL. Speech in noise intelligibility (HSM sentences test at +10 dB SNR) was significantly (p < 0.001) better in Codacs™ (80% median) than in CI patients (25% median) in all tested groups. Our results indicate for patients with sufficient cochlear reserve that speech intelligibility in noise with the Codacs™ hearing implant is significantly better than with a CI. Further, results in Codacs™ were better predictable, encouraging the extension of the indication to patients with less cochlear reserve than reported here.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlea implant; Codacs™; Direct acoustic cochlea implant (DACI); Speech in noise, HSM

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26836967     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  4 in total

1.  Mastoidectomy dimensions for direct acoustic cochlear implantation: a human cadaveric temporal bone study.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorino; Maurizio Amadori
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Hearing Aid Treatment for Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part II: Speech Recognition in Comparison to Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation.

Authors:  Nina Wardenga; Ad F M Snik; Eugen Kludt; Bernd Waldmann; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 3.  [Active hearing implants in chronic otitis media].

Authors:  S Lailach; C Müller; N Lasurashvili; H Seidler; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Hearing Rehabilitation of Patients with Chronic Otitis Media: A Discussion of Current State of Knowledge and Research Priorities.

Authors:  Douglas Backous; Byung Yoon Choi; Rafael Jaramillo; Kelvin Kong; Thomas Lenarz; Jaydip Ray; Alok Thakar; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.316

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.