Literature DB >> 23921930

Multicenter study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant.

Thomas Lenarz1, Joost W Zwartenkot, Christof Stieger, Burkard Schwab, Emmanuel A M Mylanus, Marco Caversaccio, Martin Kompis, Ad F M Snik, Christiane D'hondt, Hamidreza Mojallal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of a direct acoustic cochlear implant. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study.
SETTING: The study was performed at 3 university hospitals in Europe (Germany, The Netherlands, and Switzerland). PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss because of otosclerosis or previous failed stapes surgery. INTERVENTION: Implantation with a Codacs direct acoustic cochlear implant investigational device (ID) combined with a stapedotomy with a conventional stapes prosthesis MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative (3 months after activation of the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant) audiometric evaluation measuring conventional pure tone and speech audiometry, tympanometry, aided thresholds in sound field and hearing difficulty by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit questionnaire.
RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative air and bone conduction thresholds did not change significantly by the implantation with the investigational Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant. The mean sound field thresholds (0.25-8 kHz) improved significantly by 48 dB. The word recognition scores (WRS) at 50, 65, and 80 dB SPL improved significantly by 30.4%, 75%, and 78.2%, respectively, after implantation with the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant compared with the preoperative unaided condition. The difficulty in hearing, measured by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, decreased by 27% after implantation with the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant.
CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate-to-severe mixed hearing loss because of otosclerosis can benefit substantially using the Codacs investigational device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23921930     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318298aa76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Device-based treatment of mixed hearing loss: An audiological comparison of current hearing systems].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Mastoidectomy dimensions for direct acoustic cochlear implantation: a human cadaveric temporal bone study.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorino; Maurizio Amadori
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Hearing Aid Treatment for Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part II: Speech Recognition in Comparison to Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation.

Authors:  Nina Wardenga; Ad F M Snik; Eugen Kludt; Bernd Waldmann; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Subtotal petrosectomy and Codacs™: new possibilities in ears with chronic infection.

Authors:  Burkard Schwab; Eugen Kludt; Hannes Maier; Thomas Lenarz; Magnus Teschner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  [Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation for therapy of severe to profound mixed hearing loss: Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System].

Authors:  T Lenarz; B Schwab; H Maier; E Kludt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  Efficacy of Auditory Implants for Patients With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss Depends on Implant Center.

Authors:  Ad Snik; Hannes Maier; Bill Hodgetts; Martin Kompis; Griet Mertens; Paul van de Heyning; Thomas Lenarz; Arjan Bosman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  The Codacs™ direct acoustic cochlear implant actuator: exploring alternative stimulation sites and their stimulation efficiency.

Authors:  Martin Grossöhmichen; Rolf Salcher; Hans-Heinrich Kreipe; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Direct Acoustic Stimulation at the Lateral Canal: An Alternative Route to the Inner Ear?

Authors:  Nicolas Verhaert; Joris Walraevens; Christian Desloovere; Jan Wouters; Jean-Marc Gérard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Differential Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Human Temporal Bones with an Off-the-Shelf Sensor.

Authors:  Martin Grossöhmichen; Rolf Salcher; Klaus Püschel; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.