Literature DB >> 28246884

Post-fracture care: do we need to educate patients rather than doctors? The PREVOST randomized controlled trial.

B Merle1,2, R Chapurlat3, E Vignot3, T Thomas4, J Haesebaert5, A-M Schott5.   

Abstract

We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a population-based patient-centered post-fracture care program with a dedicated case manager, PREVention of OSTeoporosis (PREVOST), on appropriate post-fracture osteoporosis management. We showed that, compared to usual care, BMD investigation post-fracture was significantly improved (+20%) by our intervention program.
INTRODUCTION: Our study aims to evaluate the impact of a population-based patient-centered post-fracture care program, PREVOST, on appropriate post-fracture care.
METHODS: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolling 436 women aged 50 to 85 years and attending a French hospital, for a low-energy fracture of the wrist or humerus. Randomization was stratified by age, hospital department, and site of fracture. The intervention was performed by a trained case manager who interacted only with the patients, with repeated oral and written information about fragility fractures and osteoporosis management, and prompting them to visit their primary care physicians. Control group received usual care. The primary outcome was the initiation of an appropriate post-fracture care defined by Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and/or anti-osteoporotic treatment prescription at 6 months.
RESULTS: At 6 months, 53% of women in intervention group initiated a post-fracture care versus 33% for usual care (adjOR 2.35, 95%CI [1.58-3.50], p < 0.001). Post-fracture care was more frequent after wrist than humerus fracture (adjOR 1.93, 95%CI [1.14-3.30], p = 0.015) and decreased with age (adjOR for 10 years increase 0.76, 95%CI [0.61-0.96], p = 0.02). The intervention resulted in BMD prescription in 50% of patients (adjOR 2.10, 95%CI [1.41-3.11], p < 0.001) and in BMD performance in 41% of patients (adjOR 2.12, 95%CI [1.40-3.20], p < 0.001) versus 33 and 25% for usual care, respectively. Having performed a BMD increased treatment prescription; however, only 46% of women with a low BMD requiring a treatment according to the French guidelines received a prescription.
CONCLUSION: A patient-centered care program with a dedicated case manager can significantly improve post-fracture BMD investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic fractures; Patient empowerment; Randomized controlled trial; Secondary prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28246884     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-3953-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  39 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision.

Authors:  J H E Yong; L Masucci; J S Hoch; R Sujic; D Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Lisa LaBine; Penny Klassen; Darlene Dreilich; Patricia A Caetano
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  D Marsh; K Akesson; D E Beaton; E R Bogoch; S Boonen; M-L Brandi; A R McLellan; P J Mitchell; J E M Sale; D A Wahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996-2008: the situation is not improving.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Giangregorio; M Yogendran; M Azimaee; S Morin; C Metge; P Caetano; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Management of osteoporosis in fracture liaison service associated with long-term adherence to treatment.

Authors:  L Boudou; B Gerbay; F Chopin; E Ollagnier; P Collet; T Thomas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Initiation of osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic results in improved osteoporosis management: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J M Queally; C Kiernan; M Shaikh; F Rowan; D Bennett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson; Finlay A McAlister; Debbie Bellerose; Anthony S Russell; David A Hanley; Don W Morrish; Walter P Maksymowych; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service.

Authors:  K F Axelsson; R Jacobsson; D Lund; M Lorentzon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Low Osteoporosis Treatment Initiation Rate in Women after Distal Forearm or Proximal Humerus Fracture: A Healthcare Database Nested Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marie Viprey; Pascal Caillet; Guillaume Canat; Susan Jaglal; Julie Haesebaert; Roland Chapurlat; Anne-Marie Schott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review.

Authors:  C-H Wu; C-H Chen; P-H Chen; J-J Yang; P-C Chang; T-C Huang; S Bagga; Y Sharma; R-M Lin; D-C Chan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Interventions to improve osteoporosis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Martin; M Viprey; B Castagne; B Merle; C Giroudon; R Chapurlat; A-M Schott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Higher rates of osteoporosis treatment initiation and persistence in patients with newly diagnosed vertebral fracture when introduced in inpatients than later in outpatients.

Authors:  H Spechbach; I Fabreguet; E Saule; M Hars; J Stirnemann; S Ferrari; R Rizzoli; T Chevalley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Quality Measures and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Osteoporosis-an Update.

Authors:  S French; S Choden; Gabriela Schmajuk
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  How Can We Improve Osteoporosis Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Quality Improvement Strategies for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Osteoporosis prevention: where are the barriers to improvement in a French general population? A qualitative study.

Authors:  B Merle; C Dupraz; J Haesebaert; L Barraud; M Aussedat; C Motteau; V Simon; A M Schott; M Flori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  The global approach to rehabilitation following an osteoporotic fragility fracture: A review of the rehabilitation working group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) committee of scientific advisors.

Authors:  D Pinto; M Alshahrani; R Chapurlat; T Chevalley; E Dennison; B M Camargos; A Papaioannou; S Silverman; J-F Kaux; N E Lane; J Morales Torres; J Paccou; R Rizzoli; O Bruyere
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.507

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.