Literature DB >> 28237212

Value Assessment at the Point of Care: Incorporating Patient Values throughout Care Delivery and a Draft Taxonomy of Patient Values.

Melissa J Armstrong1, C Daniel Mullins2.   

Abstract

Incorporation of patient values is a key element of patient-centered care, but consistent incorporation of patient values at the point of care is lacking. Shared decision making encourages incorporation of patient values in decision making, but associated tools often lack guidance on value assessment. In addition, focusing on patient values relating only to specific decisions misses an opportunity for a more holistic approach to value assessment that could impact other aspects of clinical encounters, including health care planning, communication, and stakeholder involvement. In this commentary, we propose a taxonomy of values underlying patient decision making and provide examples of how these impact provision of health care. The taxonomy describes four categories of patient values: global, decisional, situational, and external. Global values are personal values impacting decision making at a universal level and can include value traits and life priorities. Decisional values are the values traditionally conceptualized in decision making, including considerations such as efficacy, toxicity, quality of life, convenience, and cost. Situational values are values tied to a specific moment in time that modify patients' existing global and decisional values. Finally, discussion of external values acknowledges that many patients consider values other than their own when making decisions. Recognizing the breadth of values impacting patient decision making has implications for both overall health care delivery and shared decision making because value assessments focusing only on decisional values may miss important patient considerations. This draft taxonomy highlights different values impacting decision making and facilitates a more complete value assessment at the point of care.
Copyright © 2017 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; shared decision making; taxonomy; value

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28237212      PMCID: PMC5417067          DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  18 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; T Van der Weijden; M P T De Wit; D Frosch; F Légaré; V M Montori; L Trevena; G Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-27

3.  A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Newell McElwee; Jeanne-Marie Guise; John Santa; Patrick H Conway; Denise Daudelin; Elaine H Morrato; Laurel K Leslie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Susan Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Values-based practice in primary care: easing the tensions between individual values, ethical principles and best evidence.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Jeremy Dale; Bill K W M Fulford
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy.

Authors:  Andrew G H Thompson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Carol Bennett; Dawn Stacey; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Vikki Entwistle; Valerie Fiset; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sara Khangura; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; David R Rovner
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 8.  Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making.

Authors:  Anita Ho
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2008-03

9.  Medical decision making: the family-doctor-patient triad.

Authors:  Fawad Aslam; Omar Aftab; Naveed Z Janjua
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette M O'Connor; Carol Bennett; Robert G Newcombe; Mary Politi; Marie-Anne Durand; Elizabeth Drake; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Sara Khangura; Anton Saarimaki; Stephanie Sivell; Mareike Stiel; Steven J Bernstein; Nananda Col; Angela Coulter; Karen Eden; Martin Härter; Margaret Holmes Rovner; Nora Moumjid; Dawn Stacey; Richard Thomson; Tim Whelan; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Operationalizing patient-centered cancer care: A systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature on cancer patients' needs, values, and preferences.

Authors:  Kerri-Anne R Mitchell; Kelly J Brassil; Serena A Rodriguez; Edward Tsai; Kayo Fujimoto; Kate J Krause; L Aubree Shay; Andrew E Springer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Melissa J Armstrong; Gary S Gronseth
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2018-02

3.  Patient values in healthcare decision making among diverse older adults.

Authors:  Andrea M Kurasz; Glenn E Smith; Rosie E Curiel; Warren W Barker; Raquel C Behar; Alexandra Ramirez; Melissa J Armstrong
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-08-28

Review 4.  Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care.

Authors:  Melissa J Armstrong
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2017-04-16

5.  "I don't know exactly what you're referring to": the challenge of values elicitation in decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Sandra L Carroll; Gayathri Embuldeniya; Jasprit Pannag; Krystina B Lewis; Jeff S Healey; Michael McGillion; Lehana Thabane; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Making community voices heard in a research-health service alliance, the evolving role of the Community Advisory Group: a case study from the members' perspective.

Authors:  Janet L Wale; Louisa Di Pietro; Heather Renton; Margaret Sahhar; Christine Walker; Pamela Williams; Karen Meehan; Elly Lynch; Melissa Martyn; Jane Bell; Ingrid Winship; Clara L Gaff
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2021-11-27

7.  What Matters to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis When Facing Medical or Non-Medical Treatment Decisions?

Authors:  Lisa Emily Cornelissen; Elise J van der Mark; Patricia Pennings; Bertha Maat; Theo Foekens; Gerardine Willemsen-de Mey; Helene R Voogdt-Pruis
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Determinants of drug expenditure in the Swiss healthcare market in 2006.

Authors:  Yves Eggli; Anne Decollogny; Romain Piaget-Rossel; Patrick Taffé
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.908

9.  A Budget Impact Model to Estimate the Environmental Impact of Adopting RESPIMAT® Re-usable in the Nordics and Benelux.

Authors:  Gustaf Ortsäter; Fredrik Borgström; Stéphane Soulard; Carolin Miltenburger
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Stakeholder-Engaged Derivation of Patient-Informed Value Elements.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Beverly Butler; Juan Caicedo; Annie Kennedy; Yoon Duk Hong; Chengchen Zhang; Julia F Slejko
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.883

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.