Literature DB >> 17174016

The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy.

Andrew G H Thompson1.   

Abstract

A number of trends, pressures and policy shifts can be identified that are promoting greater patient involvement in health care delivery through consultations, treatments and continuing care. However, while the literature is growing fast on different methods of involvement, little attention has been given so far to the role which patients themselves wish to play, nor even of the conceptual meanings behind involvement or participation. This article reviews the current models of involvement in health care delivery as derived from studies of professional views of current and potential practice, prior to examining the empirical evidence from a large-scale qualitative study of the views and preferences of citizens, as patients, members of voluntary groups, or neither. Individual domiciliary interviews were carried out with 44 people recruited from GP practices in northern England. These respondents were then included in a second phase of 34 focus groups in 6 different localities in northern and southern England, of which 22 were with individuals unaffiliated to any voluntary/community groups, 6 related to local voluntary/community groups with specific interests in health or health care, and 6 related to groups without such specific interests. A final set of 12 workshops with the same samples helped to confirm emergent themes. The qualitative data enabled a taxonomy of patient-desired involvement to be derived, which is contrasted with professional-determined levels of involvement identified from the literature. Participation is seen as being co-determined by patients and professionals, and occurring only through the reciprocal relationships of dialogue and shared decision-making. Not everyone wanted to be involved and the extent to which involvement was desired depended on the contexts of type and seriousness of illness, various personal characteristics and patients' relationships with professionals. These levels are seen to provide basic building blocks for a more sophisticated understanding of involvement within and between these contexts for use by professionals, managers, policy-makers and researchers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17174016     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  120 in total

1.  Are elected health boards an effective mechanism for public participation in health service governance?

Authors:  Robin Gauld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Developing a framework to support shared decision making for youth mental health medication treatment.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Crickard; Megan S O'Brien; Charles A Rapp; Cheryl L Holmes
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-06-23

3.  Behind Closed Doors: What Happens when Patients and Providers Talk about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening?: Survey of the Effects of a Community-Based Intervention.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Carla Bann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  New elements for informed decision making: a qualitative study of older adults' views.

Authors:  Erika Leemann Price; Sylvia Bereknyei; Alma Kuby; Wendy Levinson; Clarence Henry Braddock
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-07-14

5.  Inpatients' and providers' experiences with user involvement in inpatient care.

Authors:  Marianne Storm; Larry Davidson
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2010-06

6.  Moving from Patient Advocacy to Partnership: A Long and Bumpy Road.

Authors:  Durhane Wong-Rieger
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Patient participation from the perspective of staff members working in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jeanette Melin; Lars-Olof Persson; Charles Taft; Margareta Kreuter
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Engaging communication experts in a Delphi process to identify patient behaviors that could enhance communication in medical encounters.

Authors:  Jaya K Rao; Lynda A Anderson; Bhuvana Sukumar; Danielle A Beauchesne; Terry Stein; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Models of user involvement in the mental health context: intentions and implementation challenges.

Authors:  Marianne Storm; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2013-09

10.  Demanding patient or demanding encounter?: A case study of a cancer clinic.

Authors:  Clare Louise Stacey; Stuart Henderson; Kelly R MacArthur; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.