Literature DB >> 16954004

Values-based practice in primary care: easing the tensions between individual values, ethical principles and best evidence.

Mila Petrova1, Jeremy Dale, Bill K W M Fulford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The provision of health care is inseparable from universal values such as caring, helping and compassion. Consideration for individual values, particularly those of the patient, has also been increasing. However, such consideration is difficult within the context of modern health care, where complex and conflicting values are often in play. This is particularly so when a patient's values seem to be at odds with evidence-based practice or widely shared ethical principles, or when a health professional's personal values may compromise the care provided. SUGGESTED NEW FRAMEWORK: Values-based practice, a framework developed originally in the domain of mental health, maintains that values are pervasive and powerful parameters influencing decisions about health, clinical practice and research, and that their impact is often underestimated. Although it shares starting points with other approaches to values, it suggests that our current approaches lead us to ignore some important manifestations of values at both the general level, as relevant in legal, policy and research contexts, as well as at the individual level, as relevant in clinical practice. Drawing on ideas from philosophy, values-based practice significantly extends the range of phenomena that may be regarded as value-laden. It suggests that one of the reasons for overlooking values is that they are presumed to be shared when not apparently conflicting. Values-based practice is an approach to supporting clinical decision-making, which provides practical skills and tools for eliciting individual values and negotiating these with respect to best available evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16954004      PMCID: PMC1876638     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  5 in total

1.  Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care.

Authors:  R E Upshur; E G VanDenKerkhof; V Goel
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice.

Authors:  R Brian Haynes; P J Devereaux; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-08

Review 3.  Conscientious objection in medicine.

Authors:  Julian Savulescu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-04

4.  Acceptance of dementia screening in continuous care retirement communities: a mailed survey.

Authors:  Malaz Boustani; Lea Watson; Bridget Fultz; Anthony J Perkins; Richard Druckenbrod
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.485

Review 5.  A categorization and analysis of the criticisms of Evidence-Based Medicine.

Authors:  Aaron Michael Cohen; P Zoë Stavri; William R Hersh
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.046

  5 in total
  21 in total

1.  Ethics of the ordinary: a class response.

Authors:  Anita Cyril; Laween Al Atroshi; Thura Limbin; Prod Louca; Rebecca Taylor; Caroline Allison; Sylvia Nyame; Yewande Ajakaiye; Andrew Papanikitas
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  'The human prerogative': a critical analysis of evidence-based and other paradigms of care in substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Eric Broekaert; Mieke Autrique; Wouter Vanderplasschen; Kathy Colpaert
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2010-09

3.  Values-based care.

Authors:  Craig K Brown
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Primary care ethics: a body of literature and a community of scholars?

Authors:  Andrew Papanikitas; Peter Toon
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Shared decision making: a need for honesty?

Authors:  Jonathan Ives; Andrew Papanikitas; Paul Myres; Simon Gregory
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Value Assessment at the Point of Care: Incorporating Patient Values throughout Care Delivery and a Draft Taxonomy of Patient Values.

Authors:  Melissa J Armstrong; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Perceived difficulties in managing ethical problems in family practice in Slovenia: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zalika Klemenc-Ketis; Janko Kersnik; Janja Ojstersek
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Promoting networks between evidence-based medicine and values-based medicine in continuing medical education.

Authors:  Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante; Nelly F Altamirano-Bustamante; Alberto Lifshitz; Ignacio Mora-Magaña; Adalberto de Hoyos; María Teresa Avila-Osorio; Silvia Quintana-Vargas; Jorge A Aguirre; Jorge Méndez; Chiharu Murata; Rodrigo Nava-Diosdado; Oscar Martínez-González; Elisa Calleja; Raúl Vargas; Juan Manuel Mejía-Arangure; Araceli Cortez-Domínguez; Fernand Vedrenne-Gutiérrez; Perla Sueiras; Juan Garduño; Sergio Islas-Andrade; Fabio Salamanca; Jesús Kumate-Rodríguez; Alejandro Reyes-Fuentes
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Value-based medicine: concepts and application.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2015-03-04

10.  Challenges in multidisciplinary cancer care among general surgeons in Canada.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Frances C Wright; Dave Davis; Robin S McLeod; David R Urbach
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.