Literature DB >> 28237000

Dose Estimation in Pediatric Nuclear Medicine.

Frederic H Fahey1, Alison B Goodkind2, Donika Plyku3, Kitiwat Khamwan4, Shannon E O'Reilly5, Xinhua Cao2, Eric C Frey3, Ye Li3, Wesley E Bolch6, George Sgouros3, S Ted Treves7.   

Abstract

The practice of nuclear medicine in children is well established for imaging practically all physiologic systems but particularly in the fields of oncology, neurology, urology, and orthopedics. Pediatric nuclear medicine yields images of physiologic and molecular processes that can provide essential diagnostic information to the clinician. However, nuclear medicine involves the administration of radiopharmaceuticals that expose the patient to ionizing radiation and children are thought to be at a higher risk for adverse effects from radiation exposure than adults. Therefore it may be considered prudent to take extra care to optimize the radiation dose associated with pediatric nuclear medicine. This requires a solid understanding of the dosimetry associated with the administration of radiopharmaceuticals in children. Models for estimating the internal radiation dose from radiopharmaceuticals have been developed by the Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and other groups. But to use these models accurately in children, better pharmacokinetic data for the radiopharmaceuticals and anatomical models specifically for children need to be developed. The use of CT in the context of hybrid imaging has also increased significantly in the past 15 years, and thus CT dosimetry as it applies to children needs to be better understood. The concept of effective dose has been used to compare different practices involving radiation on a dosimetric level, but this approach may not be appropriate when applied to a population of children of different ages as the radiosensitivity weights utilized in the calculation of effective dose are not specific to children and may vary as a function of age on an organ-by-organ bias. As these gaps in knowledge of dosimetry and radiation risk as they apply to children are filled, more accurate models can be developed that allow for better approaches to dose optimization. In turn, this will lead to an overall improvement in the practice of pediatric nuclear medicine by providing excellent diagnostic image quality at the lowest radiation dose possible.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28237000      PMCID: PMC5777684          DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  28 in total

1.  NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure--are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists?

Authors:  D A Schauer; O W Linton
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital.

Authors:  L F Donnelly; K H Emery; A S Brody; T Laor; V M Gylys-Morin; C G Anton; S R Thomas; D P Frush
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Establishing age-associated normative ranges of the cerebral 18F-FDG uptake ratio in children.

Authors:  Chiaho Hua; Thomas E Merchant; Xingyu Li; Yimei Li; Barry L Shulkin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Changes in radiation dose with variations in human anatomy: larger and smaller normal-stature adults.

Authors:  Patrick M Marine; Michael G Stabin; Michael J Fernald; Aaron B Brill
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Pediatric 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT with ordered subset expectation maximization iterative reconstruction with isotropic 3D resolution recovery.

Authors:  Eryn Caamano Stansfield; Niall Sheehy; David Zurakowski; A Hans Vija; Frederic H Fahey; S Ted Treves
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Maturational changes in cerebral function in infants determined by 18FDG positron emission tomography.

Authors:  H T Chugani; M E Phelps
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A risk index for pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic imaging with (99m)Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid that accounts for body habitus.

Authors:  Shannon E O'Reilly; Donika Plyku; George Sgouros; Frederic H Fahey; S Ted Treves; Eric C Frey; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development.

Authors:  H T Chugani; M E Phelps; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Anthropometric approaches and their uncertainties to assigning computational phantoms to individual patients in pediatric dosimetry studies.

Authors:  Scott Whalen; Choonsik Lee; Jonathan L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Pediatric 99mTc-DMSA SPECT performed by using iterative reconstruction with isotropic resolution recovery: improved image quality and reduced radiopharmaceutical activity.

Authors:  Niall Sheehy; Tracy A Tetrault; David Zurakowski; A Hans Vija; Frederic H Fahey; S Ted Treves
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Image quality and lesion detectability in low-dose pediatric 18F-FDG scans using total-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Yu-Mo Zhao; Ying-He Li; Tao Chen; Wei-Guang Zhang; Lin-Hao Wang; Jiatai Feng; Chenwei Li; Xu Zhang; Wei Fan; Ying-Ying Hu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Current pediatric administered activity guidelines for 99m Tc-DMSA SPECT based on patient weight do not provide the same task-based image quality.

Authors:  Ye Li; Shannon O'Reilly; Donika Plyku; S Ted Treves; Frederic Fahey; Yong Du; Xinhua Cao; Briana Sexton-Stallone; Justin Brown; George Sgouros; Wesley E Bolch; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Re-evaluation of pediatric 18F-FDG dosimetry: Cristy-Eckerman versus UF/NCI hybrid computational phantoms.

Authors:  Kitiwat Khamwan; Shannon E O'Reilly; Donika Plyku; Alison Goodkind; Anders Josefsson; Xinhua Cao; Frederic H Fahey; S Ted Treves; Wesley E Bolch; George Sgouros
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  An Australian local diagnostic reference level for paediatric whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Essam Mohammed Alkhybari; Mark F McEntee; Kathy P Willowson; Patrick C Brennan; Theo Kitsos; Peter L Kench
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Gonad dose assessment in paediatric kidney nuclear medicine test using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Dong-Yeon Lee; Yong-Uk Kye; Hyo-Jin Kim; Jeung-Kee Kim; Yeong-Rok Kang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Examinations and Subsequent Risk of Neoplasm: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mei-Kang Yuan; Shih-Chieh Chang; Mei-Chun Yuan; Ning-Ping Foo; Shan-Ho Chan; Shyh-Yau Wang; Cheng-Li Lin; Chung-Y Hsu; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-20

7.  Renal 99mTc-DMSA pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Donika Plyku; Michael Ghaly; Ye Li; Justin L Brown; Shannon O'Reilly; Kitiwat Khamwan; Alison B Goodkind; Briana Sexton-Stallone; Xinhua Cao; David Zurakowski; Frederic H Fahey; S Ted Treves; Wesley E Bolch; Eric C Frey; George Sgouros
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-07-20

8.  Investigating Low-Dose Image Quality in Whole-Body Pediatric 18F-FDG Scans Using Time-of-Flight PET/MRI.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Suleman Surti; Hansel J Otero; Sabah Servaes; Joel S Karp; Lisa J States
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.