Literature DB >> 20395339

Changes in radiation dose with variations in human anatomy: larger and smaller normal-stature adults.

Patrick M Marine1, Michael G Stabin, Michael J Fernald, Aaron B Brill.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A systematic evaluation has been performed to study how specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) vary with changes in adult body size, for persons of different size but normal body stature.
METHODS: A review of the literature was performed to evaluate how individual organ sizes vary with changes in total body weight of normal-stature individuals. On the basis of this literature review, changes were made to our easily deformable reference adult male and female total-body models. Monte Carlo simulations of radiation transport were performed; SAFs for photons were generated for 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentile adults; and comparisons were made to the reference (50th) percentile SAF values.
RESULTS: Differences in SAFs for organs irradiating themselves were between 0.5% and 1.0%/kg difference in body weight, from 15% to 30% overall, for organs within the trunk. Differences in SAFs for organs outside the trunk were not greater than the uncertainties in the data and will not be important enough to change calculated doses. For organs irradiating other organs within the trunk, differences were significant, between 0.3% and 1.1%/kg, or about 8%-33% overall.
CONCLUSION: The differences are interesting and can be used to estimate how different patients' dosimetry might vary from values reported in standard dose tables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20395339      PMCID: PMC2931266          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  9 in total

1.  Organ weight in 684 adult autopsies: new tables for a Caucasoid population.

Authors:  G L de la Grandmaison; I Clairand; M Durigon
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose assessment.

Authors:  Michael G Stabin; Jeffry A Siegel
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Cheryl D Fryar; Margaret D Carroll; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2004-10-27

4.  Uncertainties in internal dose calculations for radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Michael G Stabin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  M G Stabin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: U.S. population, 1999-2002.

Authors:  Margaret A McDowell; Cheryl D Fryar; Rosemarie Hirsch; Cynthia L Ogden
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2005-07-07

7.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom.

Authors:  W S Snyder; H L Fisher; M R Ford; G G Warner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Changes in brain weights during the span of human life: relation of brain weights to body heights and body weights.

Authors:  A S Dekaban
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Michael G Stabin; Richard B Sparks; Eric Crowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Realistic reference adult and paediatric phantom series for internal and external dosimetry.

Authors:  M G Stabin; M A Emmons; W P Segars; M J Fernald
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Changes in radiation dose with variations in human anatomy: moderately and severely obese adults.

Authors:  Landon D Clark; Michael G Stabin; Michael J Fernald; Aaron B Brill
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Biomechanical analysis of the splenic avulsion mechanism.

Authors:  Omar Chebil; Michel Behr; Florent Auriault; Pierre-Jean Arnoux
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution of the TSPO ligand 11C-DPA-713 in humans.

Authors:  Christopher J Endres; Jennifer M Coughlin; Kenneth L Gage; Crystal C Watkins; Michael Kassiou; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Dose Estimation in Pediatric Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Alison B Goodkind; Donika Plyku; Kitiwat Khamwan; Shannon E O'Reilly; Xinhua Cao; Eric C Frey; Ye Li; Wesley E Bolch; George Sgouros; S Ted Treves
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  Individualized adjustments to reference phantom internal organ dosimetry-scaling factors given knowledge of patient internal anatomy.

Authors:  Michael B Wayson; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates.

Authors:  Brian Quinn; Zak Dauer; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Heiko Schoder; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Radiation Dosimetry of Whole-Body Dual-Tracer 18F-FDG and 11C-Acetate PET/CT for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Pek-Lan Khong; Yiming Gao; Usman Mahmood; Brian Quinn; Jean St Germain; X George Xu; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  R Ghanbarnezhad Farshi; A Mesbahi; M Johari; Ü Kara; N Gharehaghaji
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2019-02-01

10.  Quantification of internal dosimetry in PET patients II: Individualized Monte Carlo-based dosimetry for [18F]fluorocholine PET.

Authors:  Sara Neira; Jacobo Guiu-Souto; Paulino Pais; Sofía Rodríguez Martínez de Llano; Carlos Fernández; Virginia Pubul; Álvaro Ruibal; Miguel Pombar; Araceli Gago-Arias; Juan Pardo-Montero
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.506

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.