Literature DB >> 28236080

What Are the Frequency, Associated Factors, and Mortality of Amputation and Arthrodesis After a Failed Infected TKA?

Min-Sun Son1, Edmund Lau2, Javad Parvizi3, Michael A Mont4, Kevin J Bozic5, Steven Kurtz6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with failed surgical treatment of an infected TKA, salvage operations such as arthrodesis or above-knee amputation (AKA) may be considered. Clinical and institutional factors associated with AKA and arthrodesis after a failed TKA have not been investigated in a large-scale population, and the utilization rate and trend of these measures are not well known. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How has the frequency of arthrodesis and AKA after infected TKA changed over the last 10 years? (2) What clinical or institutional factors are associated with patients undergoing arthrodesis or AKA? (3) What is the risk of mortality after arthrodesis or AKA?
METHODS: The Medicare 100% National Inpatient Claims Database was used to identify 44,466 patients 65 years of age or older who were diagnosed with an infected TKA and who underwent revision between 2005 and 2014 based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Overall, 1182 knee arthrodeses and 1864 AKAs were identified among the study population. One year of data before the index infection-related knee revision were used to examine patient demographic, institutional, and clinical factors, including comorbidities, hospital volumes, and surgeon volumes. We developed Cox regression models to investigate the risk of arthrodesis, AKA, and death as outcomes. In addition, the year of the index revision was included as a covariate to determine if the risk of subsequent surgical interventions was changing over time. The risk of mortality was also assessed as the event of interest using a similar multivariate Cox model for each patient group (arthrodesis, AKA) in addition to those who underwent additional revisions but who did not undergo either of the salvage procedures.
RESULTS: The number of arthrodesis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90, p < 0.001) and amputation (HR, 0.95, p < 0.001) procedures showed a declining trend. Clinical factors associated with arthrodesis included acute renal failure (HR, 1.22 [1.06-1.41], p = 0.006), obesity (HR, 1.58 [1.35-1.84], p < 0.001), and having additional infection-related revisions (HR for 2+ additional revisions, 1.36 [1.13-1.64], p = 0.001). Higher Charlson comorbidity score (HR for a score of 5+ versus 0, 2.56 [2.12-3.14], p < 0.001), obesity (HR, 1.14 [1.00-1.30], p = 0.044), deep vein thrombosis (HR, 1.34 [1.12-1.60], p = 0.001), and additional revisions (HR for 2+ additional revisions, 2.19 [1.91-2.49], p < 0.001) were factors associated with AKA, which in turn was an independent risk factor for mortality. The risk of death increased with amputation after adjusting for age, comorbidities, and other factors (HR, 1.28 [1.20-1.37], p < 0.001), but patients who received arthrodesis did not show a change in mortality compared with the patients who did not receive arthrodesis or amputation (HR, 1.00 [0.91-1.10], p = 0.971).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that clinicians may be more aggressively attempting to preserve the knee even in the face of chronic prosthetic joint infection but also show that a greater number of revisions is associated with a greater risk of subsequent AKA or arthrodesis. The results also suggest that recommending centers with a high volume of joint arthroplasties may be a way to reduce the risk of the salvage procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28236080      PMCID: PMC5670050          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5285-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Maryam Rezapoor; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Prosthetic joint infection risk after TKA in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edward Lau; Kevin J Bozic; Daniel Berry; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Periprosthetic joint infection: treatment options.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Benjamin Zmistowski; Bahar Adeli
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Trends and Outcomes in the Treatment of Failed Septic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparing Arthrodesis and Above-Knee Amputation.

Authors:  James B Carr; Brian C Werner; James A Browne
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Better function for fusions versus above-the-knee amputations for recurrent periprosthetic knee infection.

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Nicholas C Kinback; Alma E Heyl; Edward J McClain; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bernd Kubista; Robert U Hartzler; Christina M Wood; Douglas R Osmon; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Judith Maselli; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer; Thomas P Vail; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Above knee amputation following total knee arthroplasty: when enough is enough.

Authors:  Vickas Khanna; Daniel M Tushinski; Leslie J Soever; Alex D Vincent; David J Backstein
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Amputation after failed total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Z U Isiklar; G C Landon; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  13 in total

1.  Etiology of Above-knee Amputations in the United States: Is Periprosthetic Joint Infection an Emerging Cause?

Authors:  Jaiben George; Suparna M Navale; Emmanuel M Nageeb; Gannon L Curtis; Alison K Klika; Wael K Barsoum; Michael A Mont; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Weighing in on Body Mass Index and Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty: Is There Evidence for a Body Mass Index Threshold?

Authors:  Noam Shohat; Andrew Fleischman; Majd Tarabichi; Timothy L Tan; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Amputation as a Complication after Total Knee Replacement, is it a Real Concern to be Discussed?: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alireza Mousavian; Soheil Sabzevari; Shirin Ghiasi; Omid Shahpari; Amin Razi; Adel Ebrahimpour; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-01

4.  Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Risk of Above-knee Amputation After Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee.

Authors:  Alexander M Lieber; Gregory J Kirchner; Yehuda E Kerbel; Vincent M Moretti; Jeffrey J Vakil; Shyam Brahmabhatt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparison of dynamic and static spacers for the treatment of infections following total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiasheng Tao; Zijian Yan; Bin Pu; Ming Chen; Xiaorong Hu; Hang Dong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.677

6.  Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Extensor Mechanism Disruption With Modular Knee Fusion: Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes.

Authors:  Wesley H Mayes; Anna C Severin; Erin M Mannen; Paul K Edwards; C Lowry Barnes; Jeffrey B Stambough; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-02-26

7.  High Rate of Fusion but High Complication Rate After Knee Arthrodesis for Infected Revision Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Gustavo Aparicio; Julio Otero; Silvia Bru
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Two-Stage Arthrodesis after an Infected Total Knee Replacement Using a Coupled Nail and Dual-Plate Construct: A Third-World Solution and Review of Options.

Authors:  Marlon M Mencia; Raakesh Goalan; Atiba Akii Bua
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2020-02-10

Review 9.  Systematic review of risk prediction studies in bone and joint infection: are modifiable prognostic factors useful in predicting recurrence?

Authors:  Maria Dudareva; Andrew Hotchen; Martin A McNally; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Matthew Scarborough; Gary Collins
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-07-08

Review 10.  Implementation methods of infection prevention measures in orthopedics and traumatology - a systematic review.

Authors:  Benedikt Marche; Meike Neuwirth; Christiane Kugler; Bertil Bouillon; Frauke Mattner; Robin Otchwemah
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.