Literature DB >> 20839679

Periprosthetic joint infection: treatment options.

Javad Parvizi1, Benjamin Zmistowski, Bahar Adeli.   

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection has become the most common cause of failure following total knee arthroplasty. Over the past 4 decades, treatment of this disease has evolved with technological innovations and pathogen profiling. The appropriate treatment selection is dependent on patient immune system quality, timing of symptom onset, and pathogen type. Antibiotic suppression alone is reserved for those cases without drainage, low-virulent antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens, and patients whose level of health increases the risk of surgery past any risk associated with chronic infection. In patients with an acute onset of symptoms and antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens, irrigation and debridement with exchange of modular components is moderately successful and offers the advantage of component retention and maximum knee function. In failed irrigation or chronic periprosthetic joint infection, resection of all components is necessitated. Resection and reimplantation can either be performed in one or two stages. A single-stage exchange has the potential to decrease the number of surgeries and therefore cost. However, the success rate of direct exchange is lower than that of two-stage revision. This has led to two-stage revision, with the placement of an intra-stage antibiotic-loaded spacer, to become the "gold" standard for periprosthetic joint infection eradication. In an immunocompromised patient with an uncontrollable periprosthetic joint infection, salvage procedures are necessitated. Complete eradication of periprosthetic joint infection is achieved by resection of all components without reimplantation through arthrodesis or above-the-knee-amputation. While amputation may be unpopular with patients it provides a greater ability to reconstruct, with an external prosthesis, a functioning joint. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20839679     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100722-42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  34 in total

Review 1.  Prosthetic Joint Infections: an Update.

Authors:  C L Abad; A Haleem
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Current Recommendations for the Diagnosis of Acute and Chronic PJI for Hip and Knee-Cell Counts, Alpha-Defensin, Leukocyte Esterase, Next-generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Karan Goswami; Javad Parvizi; P Maxwell Courtney
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

3.  Human prosthetic joint infections are associated with myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs): Implications for infection persistence.

Authors:  Cortney E Heim; Debbie Vidlak; Jessica Odvody; Curtis W Hartman; Kevin L Garvin; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Do dynamic cement-on-cement knee spacers provide better function and activity during two-stage exchange?

Authors:  David J Jaekel; Judd S Day; Gregg R Klein; Harlan Levine; Javad Parvizi; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cementless modular intramedullary nail without bone-on-bone fusion as a salvage procedure in chronically infected total knee prosthesis: long-term results.

Authors:  Sara Scarponi; Lorenzo Drago; Delia Romanò; Nicola Logoluso; Andrea Peccati; Enzo Meani; Carlo L Romanò
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Prognostic Factors for Success After Irrigation and Debridement With Modular Component Exchange for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian M Klare; Thomas A Fortney; Peter W Kahng; Andrew P Cox; Benjamin J Keeney; Wayne E Moschetti
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The economic impact of periprosthetic infection in total hip arthroplasty

Authors:  Jason Akindolire; Mina W. Morcos; Jacquelyn D. Marsh; James L. Howard; Brent A. Lanting; Edward M. Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Distraction arthrodesis with intramedullary nail and mixed bone grafting after failed infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sahnghoon Lee; Jak Jang; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Arthrodesis should be strongly considered after failed two-stage reimplantation TKA.

Authors:  Chia H Wu; Chancellor F Gray; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Towards an understanding of the painful total knee: what is the role of patient biology?

Authors:  Stephen Preston; Massimo Petrera; Christopher Kim; Michael G Zywiel; Rajiv Gandhi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.