Literature DB >> 32850025

High Rate of Fusion but High Complication Rate After Knee Arthrodesis for Infected Revision Total Knee Replacement.

Gustavo Aparicio1, Julio Otero1, Silvia Bru2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee arthrodesis is a demanding technique regarding difficulties to achieve bone fusion, control of infection and its associated complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if knee arthrodesis should still be indicated after failed revision total knee replacement.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 45 patients. Age, gender, follow-up, pathogens, Charlson comorbidity index, time from primary arthroplasty to arthrodesis, number of previous procedures, surgical technique, functional capability assessed by the SF-12 score, limb-length discrepancy after arthrodesis, presence of radiographic knee fusion, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The mean age at the time of operation was 72 years. 29% of patients were men, 71% were women, and the mean follow-up was 8.5 years. The average Charlson comorbidity index was 4.5. The most common microorganisms isolated were Staphylococcus epidermidis (29%), Staphylococcus aureus (22%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15%). In 20% of patients, no microorganism was identified, and in 37% of patients the infection was polymicrobial. Time from primary total knee arthroplasty to arthrodesis was 55 months, and patients underwent a mean of 3.9 previous surgeries. The surgical technique used was an intramedullary long nail in 95.5%. Functionally, 93.3% of patients walked with weight bearing. The SF-12 was higher after arthrodesis (p < 0.05). Mean limb length discrepancy was 2.4 cm. Among the group treated with long intramedullary nailing, 91.1% obtained tibiofemoral fusion. Complications occurred in 37.6% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Knee arthrodesis with a long intramedullary nail after failed infected revision total knee replacement has a high rate of fusion, but the complication rate is high. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infection; Intramedullary nailing; Knee arthrodesis; Total knee replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32850025      PMCID: PMC7429668          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00163-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  29 in total

Review 1.  Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Omer Faruk Erkocak; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Two-stage knee arthrodesis with a modular intramedullary nail due to septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty with extensor mechanism deficiency.

Authors:  Max J Friedrich; Jan Schmolders; Matthias D Wimmer; Andreas C Strauss; Milena M Ploeger; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius; Thomas M Randau
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predictors of failure.

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; David Vegari; Anthony Ho; Benjamin Zmistowski; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Arthrodesis of the knee after failed infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans-Michael Klinger; Gunter Spahn; Wolfgang Schultz; Mike Herbert Baums
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Conversion from knee arthrodesis to arthroplasty: systematic review.

Authors:  Willem Alexander Kernkamp; Wiebe Christiaan Verra; Bart Godefridus Pijls; Jan Wilhelmus Schoones; Henrica Maria Jannetta van der Linden; Rob Gerardus Henricus Hubertus Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Knee Arthrodesis After Failure of Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.

Authors:  Tinne B Gottfriedsen; Henrik M Schrøder; Anders Odgaard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Trends and Outcomes in the Treatment of Failed Septic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparing Arthrodesis and Above-Knee Amputation.

Authors:  James B Carr; Brian C Werner; James A Browne
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Timothy L Tan; Karan Goswami; Carlos Higuera; Craig Della Valle; Antonia F Chen; Noam Shohat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Knee arthrodesis with the Ilizarov external fixator as treatment for septic failure of knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Spina; G Gualdrini; M Fosco; A Giunti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-04-28

10.  Outcome after knee arthrodesis for failed septic total knee replacement using a monolateral external fixator.

Authors:  Pablo S Corona; Alejandro Hernandez; M Mercedes Reverte-Vinaixa; Carles Amat; Xavier Flores
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.118

View more
  1 in total

1.  Low complication rate and better results for intramedullary nail - arthrodesis for infected knee joints compared to external fixator-a series of one hundred fifty two patients.

Authors:  Arnold J Suda; Xaver Brachtendorf; Marco Tinelli; Raed Wagokh; Ghaith Abou-Nouar; Oliver E Bischel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.