Tristan Whitmarsh1, Graham M Treece2, Andrew H Gee2, Kenneth E S Poole3. 1. Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 1PZ, UK. tw401@cam.ac.uk. 2. Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 1PZ, UK. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a method for measuring the cortical bone thickness from computed tomography (CT) scans with metallic implants and to assess the benefits of metal artefact removal software. METHODS: A previously validated technique based on the fitting of a cortical model was modified to also model metal structures when required. Cortical thickness measurements were taken over intact bone segments and compared with the corresponding contralateral bone segment. The evaluation dataset includes post-operative CT scans of a unipolar hemi-arthroplasty, a dynamic hip screw fixation, a bipolar hemi-arthroplasty, a fixation with cannulated screws and a total hip arthroplasty. All CT scans were analysed before and after processing with metal artefact removal software. RESULTS: Cortical thickness validity and accuracy were improved through the use of a modified metalwork-optimised model and metal artefact removal software. For the proximal femoral segments of the aforementioned cases, the cortical thickness was measured with a mean absolute error of 0.55, 0.39, 0.46, 0.53 and 0.69 mm. The hemi-pelvis produced thickness errors of 0.51, 0.52, 0.52, 0.47 and 0.67 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method was shown to measure cortical bone thickness in the presence of metalwork at a sub-millimetre accuracy. This new technique might be helpful in assessing fracture healing near implants or fixation devices, and improve the evaluation of periprosthetic bone after hip replacement surgery.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a method for measuring the cortical bone thickness from computed tomography (CT) scans with metallic implants and to assess the benefits of metal artefact removal software. METHODS: A previously validated technique based on the fitting of a cortical model was modified to also model metal structures when required. Cortical thickness measurements were taken over intact bone segments and compared with the corresponding contralateral bone segment. The evaluation dataset includes post-operative CT scans of a unipolar hemi-arthroplasty, a dynamic hip screw fixation, a bipolar hemi-arthroplasty, a fixation with cannulated screws and a total hip arthroplasty. All CT scans were analysed before and after processing with metal artefact removal software. RESULTS:Cortical thickness validity and accuracy were improved through the use of a modified metalwork-optimised model and metal artefact removal software. For the proximal femoral segments of the aforementioned cases, the cortical thickness was measured with a mean absolute error of 0.55, 0.39, 0.46, 0.53 and 0.69 mm. The hemi-pelvis produced thickness errors of 0.51, 0.52, 0.52, 0.47 and 0.67 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method was shown to measure cortical bone thickness in the presence of metalwork at a sub-millimetre accuracy. This new technique might be helpful in assessing fracture healing near implants or fixation devices, and improve the evaluation of periprosthetic bone after hip replacement surgery.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computed tomography; Cortical thickness; Hip implants; Metal artefact removal
Authors: Trenton D Roth; Nathan A Maertz; J Andrew Parr; Kenneth A Buckwalter; Robert H Choplin Journal: Radiographics Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Touraj Razavi; Richard M Palmer; Jonathan Davies; Ron Wilson; Paul J Palmer Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Milliam L Kataoka; Mary G Hochman; Edward K Rodriguez; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Shigeto Kubo; Vassilios D Raptopolous Journal: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol Date: 2010 Jul-Aug
Authors: Donald D Anderson; Thaddeus P Thomas; Ana Campos Marin; Jacob M Elkins; William D Lack; Damien Lacroix Journal: Injury Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Melissa A Pierre; David Zurakowski; Ara Nazarian; Diana A Hauser-Kara; Brian D Snyder Journal: J Biomech Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Alexandra M Claus; Saara M Totterman; Christi J Sychterz; José G Tamez-Peña; R John Looney; Charles A Engh Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.176