Literature DB >> 24857023

Imaging techniques for the assessment of fracture repair.

P Augat1, E F Morgan2, T J Lujan3, T J MacGillivray4, W H Cheung5.   

Abstract

Imaging of a healing fracture provides a non-invasive and often instructive reproduction of the fracture repair progress and the healing status of bone. However, the interpretation of this reproduction is often qualitative and provides only an indirect and surrogate measure of the mechanical stability of the healing fracture. Refinements of the available imaging techniques have been suggested to more accurately determine the healing status of bone. Plain radiographs provide the ability to determine the degree of bridging of the fracture gap and to quantify the amount of periosteal callus formation. Absorptiometric measures including dual X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography provide quantitative information on the amount and the density of newly formed bone around the site of the fracture. To include the effect of spatial distribution of newly formed bone, finite element models of healing fracture can be employed to estimate its load bearing capacity. Ultrasound technology not only avoids radiation doses to the patients but also provides the ability to additionally measure vascularity in the surrounding soft tissue of the fracture and in the fracture itself.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone vascularity; Fracture repair; Imaging; Ultra sound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24857023     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  10 in total

1.  Technical and clinical feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of long bone non-infected nonunion healing.

Authors:  Simona Pozza; Armanda De Marchi; Chiara Albertin; Domenico Albano; Ginevra Biino; Domenico Aloj; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  A review of computational models of bone fracture healing.

Authors:  Monan Wang; Ning Yang; Xinyu Wang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Utilizing Multiple BioMEMS Sensors to Monitor Orthopaedic Strain and Predict Bone Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Jakob G Wolynski; Conor J Sutherland; Hilmi Volkan Demir; Emre Unal; Akbar Alipour; Christian M Puttlitz; Kirk C McGilvray
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  An exploratory study into measuring the cortical bone thickness from CT in the presence of metal implants.

Authors:  Tristan Whitmarsh; Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; Kenneth E S Poole
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Ze Liu; Hongbin Guo; Jieyu Liang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Effect of kirenol on the interaction between the WNT/β-Catenin and RUNX2/TCF/LEF1 pathways in fracture healing in vivo.

Authors:  İbrahim Karaman; Ali Eray Günay; Mükerrem Betül Yerer; Eren Demirpolat; Serap Doğan; Arzu Hanım Yay; İbrahim Halil Kafadar
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.511

7.  Carbon/PEEK nails: a case-control study of 22 cases.

Authors:  Federico Sacchetti; Lorenzo Andreani; Michele Palazzuolo; Stephane Cherix; Enrico Bonicoli; Elisabetta Neri; Rodolfo Capanna
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-21

8.  Multi-day delay to care identified in pediatric trauma cases during COVID-19.

Authors:  Kylie G Shaw; Reba L Salton; Patrick Carry; Nancy Hadley-Miller; Gaia Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Non-destructive characterization of bone mineral content by machine learning-assisted electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Aihik Banerjee; Youyi Tai; Nosang V Myung; Jin Nam
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 10.  Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Andrea Schwab; Riccardo Levato; Matteo D'Este; Susanna Piluso; David Eglin; Jos Malda
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 60.622

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.