Literature DB >> 24857024

Computational techniques for the assessment of fracture repair.

Donald D Anderson1, Thaddeus P Thomas2, Ana Campos Marin3, Jacob M Elkins2, William D Lack4, Damien Lacroix3.   

Abstract

The combination of high-resolution three-dimensional medical imaging, increased computing power, and modern computational methods provide unprecedented capabilities for assessing the repair and healing of fractured bone. Fracture healing is a natural process that restores the mechanical integrity of bone and is greatly influenced by the prevailing mechanical environment. Mechanobiological theories have been proposed to provide greater insight into the relationships between mechanics (stress and strain) and biology. Computational approaches for modelling these relationships have evolved from simple tools to analyze fracture healing at a single point in time to current models that capture complex biological events such as angiogenesis, stochasticity in cellular activities, and cell-phenotype specific activities. The predictive capacity of these models has been established using corroborating physical experiments. For clinical application, mechanobiological models accounting for patient-to-patient variability hold the potential to predict fracture healing and thereby help clinicians to customize treatment. Advanced imaging tools permit patient-specific geometries to be used in such models. Refining the models to study the strain fields within a fracture gap and adapting the models for case-specific simulation may provide more accurate examination of the relationship between strain and fracture healing in actual patients. Medical imaging systems have significantly advanced the capability for less invasive visualization of injured musculoskeletal tissues, but all too often the consideration of these rich datasets has stopped at the level of subjective observation. Computational image analysis methods have not yet been applied to study fracture healing, but two comparable challenges which have been addressed in this general area are the evaluation of fracture severity and of fracture-associated soft tissue injury. CT-based methodologies developed to assess and quantify these factors are described and results presented to show the potential of these analysis methods.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational image analysis; Computational techniques; Computer modelling; Fracture healing; Fracture repair; Mechanobioloy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24857024      PMCID: PMC4078600          DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  36 in total

1.  Random-walk models of cell dispersal included in mechanobiological simulations of tissue differentiation.

Authors:  M A Pérez; P J Prendergast
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The capsule's contribution to total hip construct stability--a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Nicholas J Stroud; M James Rudert; Yuki Tochigi; Douglas R Pedersen; Benjamin J Ellis; John J Callaghan; Jeffrey A Weiss; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Ultrasound for the early diagnosis of tibial fracture healing after static interlocked nailing without reaming: clinical results.

Authors:  B R Moed; S Subramanian; M van Holsbeeck; J T Watson; K E Cramer; D E Karges; J G Craig; J A Bouffard
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Three-dimensional strain fields in a uniform osteotomy gap.

Authors:  A M DiGioia; E J Cheal; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation.

Authors:  Daniel B Whelan; Mohit Bhandari; David Stephen; Hans Kreder; Michael D McKee; Rad Zdero; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-03

6.  Secondary fractures associated with external fixation in pediatric femur fractures.

Authors:  D L Skaggs; A I Leet; M D Money; B A Shaw; J M Hale; V T Tolo
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 7.  Biomechanics of far cortical locking.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Florian Feist
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading.

Authors:  D Lacroix; P J Prendergast
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: a statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; S D Walter; M Karuda; A A White; J P Lawson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing.

Authors:  D R Carter; P R Blenman; G S Beaupré
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  8 in total

1.  Fixation of a split fracture of the lateral tibial plateau with a locking screw plate instead of cannulated screws would allow early weight bearing: a computational exploration.

Authors:  Ion Carrera; Pablo Eduardo Gelber; Gaetan Chary; Miguel A González-Ballester; Juan Carlos Monllau; Jerome Noailly
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  An exploratory study into measuring the cortical bone thickness from CT in the presence of metal implants.

Authors:  Tristan Whitmarsh; Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; Kenneth E S Poole
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Motion Predicts Clinical Callus Formation: Construct-Specific Finite Element Analysis of Supracondylar Femoral Fractures.

Authors:  Jacob Elkins; J Lawrence Marsh; Trevor Lujan; Richard Peindl; James Kellam; Donald D Anderson; William Lack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A homeostatic-driven turnover remodelling constitutive model for healing in soft tissues.

Authors:  Ester Comellas; T Christian Gasser; Facundo J Bellomo; Sergio Oller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: A review of principles and methods.

Authors:  Mohammad S Ghiasi; Jason Chen; Ashkan Vaziri; Edward K Rodriguez; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2017-03-16

6.  Computational modeling of human bone fracture healing affected by different conditions of initial healing stage.

Authors:  Mohammad S Ghiasi; Jason E Chen; Edward K Rodriguez; Ashkan Vaziri; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  A finite element analysis of relationship between fracture, implant and tibial tunnel.

Authors:  Yiqun Wang; Erpeng Qi; Lianyou Wang; Jiahe Tian; Xiaojun Zhang; Lu Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Novel Three-Dimensional Computational Method to Assess Rod Contour Deformation and to Map Bony Fusion in a Lumbopelvic Reconstruction After En-Bloc Sacrectomy.

Authors:  Peter Endre Eltes; Mate Turbucz; Jennifer Fayad; Ferenc Bereczki; György Szőke; Tamás Terebessy; Damien Lacroix; Peter Pal Varga; Aron Lazary
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.