Literature DB >> 20484772

Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: two plans for two hands?

Loes Janssen1, Céline Crajé, Matthias Weigelt, Bert Steenbergen.   

Abstract

We examined anticipatory motor planning and the interaction among both hands in a discrete bimanual task. To this end, participants had to grasp and manipulate two cylindrical objects simultaneously under varying conditions in which (a) the grip selection requirements, i.e., orientation of the to-be-grasped objects, differed between the two hands and (b) the type of grip for one hand was preinstructed, while the grip for the other hand was free choice. Results showed that participants, when grasping for two bars with a free grip choice, prioritized planning for comfortable end postures over symmetry of movement execution. Furthermore, when participants were free to choose a grip for their left hand, but were instructed on how to grasp an object with their right hand, we found no interaction between the grip selections of both hands, suggesting that motor planning proceeds independently for both hands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20484772     DOI: 10.1123/mcj.14.2.240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Motor Control        ISSN: 1087-1640            Impact factor:   1.422


  11 in total

1.  Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Christian Seegelke; Paola Reissig; Christoph Schütz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Jeffrey M Haddad; Elizabeth A Franz; Howard N Zelaznik; Joong Hyun Ryu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.

Authors:  Hanna Mathew; Wilfried Kunde; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Symmetries in action: on the interactive nature of planning constraints for bimanual object manipulation.

Authors:  John M Huhn; Kimberly A Schimpf; Robrecht P van der Wel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  3D motion analysis comparison of left handers' wrist flexion and cutting accuracy according to scissors type.

Authors:  Joo-Young Park; Soohee Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 8.  Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne Mary Lee Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-15

9.  Neural coupling of cooperative hand movements after stroke: role of ipsilateral afference.

Authors:  Miriam Schrafl-Altermatt; Volker Dietz
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.511

10.  Choosing actions.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Chase J Coelho; Lanyun Gong; Breanna E Studenka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.