Literature DB >> 28232598

Stage IV Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Risk Score to Predict Clinical Outcome.

Francesco Panzuto1, Elettra Merola1, Marianne Ellen Pavel2, Anja Rinke3, Patrizia Kump4, Stefano Partelli5, Maria Rinzivillo1, Victor Rodriguez-Laval6, Ulrich Frank Pape2, Rainer Lipp7, Thomas Gress3, Bertram Wiedenmann2, Massimo Falconi5, Gianfranco Delle Fave8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several risk factors predict clinical outcome in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs); however, the impact of their combination has not been investigated so far. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of stage IV GEP-NENs was performed. Multivariate analysis for progression of disease (PD) was performed by Cox proportional hazards method to obtain a risk score. Area under the curve obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the score performance. Progression-free survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-three stage IV GEP-NENs were evaluated, including 93 grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (32.9%), 153 grade 2 neuroendocrine tumors (54%), and 37 grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas (13.1%). Independent risk factors for PD were Ki67, proportion of metastatic liver involvement, and presence of extra-abdominal metastases. The risk score was calculated as follows: (0.025 × Ki67) + [(0 if no liver metastases or liver involvement <25%) OR (0.405 if liver involvement 25%-50%) OR (0.462 if liver involvement >50%)] + [(0 if no extra-abdominal metastases) OR (0.528 if extra-abdominal metastases present)]. The risk score accuracy to predict PD was superior compared with the G grading system (area under the curve: 0.705 and 0.622, respectively). Three subgroups of patients with low, intermediate, and high risk of PD according to risk score were identified, median progression-free survival being 26 months, 19 months, and 12 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In stage IV GEP-NENs, a risk score able to predict PD was obtained by combining Ki67, proportion of metastatic liver involvement, and presence of extra-abdominal metastases. The score may help to discriminate patients with different progression risk level to plan tailored therapeutic approaches and follow-up programs. The Oncologist 2017;22:409-415Implications for Practice: Clinical outcome of patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is affected by several risk factors, including the proliferative index Ki67, extension of liver metastases, and the presence of distant extra-abdominal lesions. A risk score that combines these variables may help physicians dealing with these diseases to plan the optimal therapeutic approach and follow-up program. © AlphaMed Press 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease progression; Ki67; Metastases; Neuroendocrine tumors; Prognosis; Risk score

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28232598      PMCID: PMC5388376          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  25 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Future directions in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: consensus report of the National Cancer Institute Neuroendocrine Tumor clinical trials planning meeting.

Authors:  Matthew H Kulke; Lillian L Siu; Joel E Tepper; George Fisher; Deborah Jaffe; Daniel G Haller; Lee M Ellis; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Emily K Bergsland; Timothy J Hobday; Eric Van Cutsem; James Pingpank; Kjell Oberg; Steven J Cohen; Mitchell C Posner; James C Yao
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression.

Authors:  Francesco Panzuto; Letizia Boninsegna; Nicola Fazio; Davide Campana; Maria Pia Brizzi; Gabriele Capurso; Aldo Scarpa; Filippo De Braud; Luigi Dogliotti; Paola Tomassetti; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study.

Authors:  G Rindi; M Falconi; C Klersy; L Albarello; L Boninsegna; M W Buchler; C Capella; M Caplin; A Couvelard; C Doglioni; G Delle Fave; L Fischer; G Fusai; W W de Herder; H Jann; P Komminoth; R R de Krijger; S La Rosa; T V Luong; U Pape; A Perren; P Ruszniewski; A Scarpa; A Schmitt; E Solcia; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group.

Authors:  Anja Rinke; Hans-Helge Müller; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Klaus-Jochen Klose; Peter Barth; Matthias Wied; Christina Mayer; Behnaz Aminossadati; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Michael Bläker; Jan Harder; Christian Arnold; Thomas Gress; Rudolf Arnold
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Martyn E Caplin; Marianne Pavel; Jarosław B Ćwikła; Alexandria T Phan; Markus Raderer; Eva Sedláčková; Guillaume Cadiot; Edward M Wolin; Jaume Capdevila; Lucy Wall; Guido Rindi; Alison Langley; Séverine Martinez; Joëlle Blumberg; Philippe Ruszniewski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prognostic factors influencing survival from metastatic (stage IV) gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma.

Authors:  Cosimo Durante; Houda Boukheris; Clarisse Dromain; Pierre Duvillard; Sophie Leboulleux; Dominique Elias; Thierry de Baere; David Malka; Jean Lumbroso; Joël Guigay; Martin Schlumberger; Michel Ducreux; Eric Baudin
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.678

9.  TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; H Alhman; M Caplin; A Couvelard; W W de Herder; B Erikssson; A Falchetti; M Falconi; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  A new immunohistochemistry prognostic score (IPS) for recurrence and survival in resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET).

Authors:  Antonio Viúdez; Filipe L F Carvalho; Zahra Maleki; Marianna Zahurak; Daniel Laheru; Alejandro Stark; Nilofer S Azad; Christopher L Wolfgang; Stephen Baylin; James G Herman; Ana De Jesus-Acosta
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-03
View more
  14 in total

1.  177Lu-PRRT in advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: 10-year follow-up of the IRST phase II prospective study.

Authors:  Giovanni Paganelli; Maddalena Sansovini; Silvia Nicolini; Ilaria Grassi; Toni Ibrahim; Elena Amadori; Valentina Di Iorio; Manuela Monti; Emanuela Scarpi; Alberto Bongiovanni; Mattia Altini; Luca Urso; Corrado Cittanti; Federica Matteucci; Stefano Severi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

3.  Multimodal therapy with aggressive hepatectomy, everolimus, and octreotide for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm enables 10-year survival.

Authors:  Shinsei Yumoto; Shigeki Nakagawa; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Daisuke Ogawa; Yuta Shiraishi; Hiroki Sato; Takashi Matsumoto; Katsunori Imai; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-08-29

Review 4.  Surgery in Patients with Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, Neuroendocrine Tumors G3 and High Grade Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Pernille Holmager; Seppo W Langer; Andreas Kjaer; Lene Ringholm; Rajendra Singh Garbyal; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Carsten Palnæs Hansen; Birgitte Federspiel; Mikkel Andreassen; Ulrich Knigge
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-04-01

5.  Clinical Usefulness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnostic Algorithm of Advanced Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Maria Rinzivillo; Stefano Partelli; Daniela Prosperi; Gabriele Capurso; Patrizia Pizzichini; Elsa Iannicelli; Elettra Merola; Francesca Muffatti; Francesco Scopinaro; Orazio Schillaci; Matteo Salgarello; Massimo Falconi; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Francesco Panzuto
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-08

6.  Correlation between MGMT promoter methylation and response to temozolomide-based therapy in neuroendocrine neoplasms: an observational retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Davide Campana; Thomas Walter; Sara Pusceddu; Fabio Gelsomino; Emmanuelle Graillot; Natalie Prinzi; Andrea Spallanzani; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Marc Barritault; Filippo Dall'Olio; Nicole Brighi; Guido Biasco
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Impact of liver tumour burden, alkaline phosphatase elevation, and target lesion size on treatment outcomes with 177Lu-Dotatate: an analysis of the NETTER-1 study.

Authors:  Jonathan Strosberg; Pamela L Kunz; Andrew Hendifar; James Yao; David Bushnell; Matthew H Kulke; Richard P Baum; Martyn Caplin; Philippe Ruszniewski; Ebrahim Delpassand; Timothy Hobday; Chris Verslype; Al Benson; Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan; Marianne Pavel; Jaume Mora; Jordan Berlin; Enrique Grande; Nicholas Reed; Ettore Seregni; Giovanni Paganelli; Stefano Severi; Michael Morse; David C Metz; Catherine Ansquer; Frédéric Courbon; Adil Al-Nahhas; Eric Baudin; Francesco Giammarile; David Taïeb; Erik Mittra; Edward Wolin; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Rachida Lebtahi; Christophe M Deroose; Chiara M Grana; Lisa Bodei; Kjell Öberg; Berna Degirmenci Polack; Beilei He; Maurizio F Mariani; Germo Gericke; Paola Santoro; Jack L Erion; Laura Ravasi; Eric Krenning
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  A classification prognostic score to predict OS in stage IV well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Sara Pusceddu; Francesco Barretta; Annalisa Trama; Laura Botta; Massimo Milione; Roberto Buzzoni; Filippo De Braud; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Ugo Pastorino; Ettore Seregni; Luigi Mariani; Gemma Gatta; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Daniela Femia; Natalie Prinzi; Jorgelina Coppa; Francesco Panzuto; Lorenzo Antonuzzo; Emilio Bajetta; Maria Pia Brizzi; Davide Campana; Laura Catena; Harry Comber; Fiona Dwane; Nicola Fazio; Antongiulio Faggiano; Dario Giuffrida; Kris Henau; Toni Ibrahim; Riccardo Marconcini; Sara Massironi; Maja Primic Žakelj; Francesca Spada; Salvatore Tafuto; Elizabeth Van Eycken; Jan Maaten Van der Zwan; Tina Žagar; Luca Giacomelli; Rosalba Miceli
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.678

9.  Tumor Digital Masking Allows Precise Patient Triaging: A Study Based on Ki-67 Scoring in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Piotr Lewitowicz; Jaroslaw Matykiewicz; Magdalena Chrapek; Dorota Koziel; Agata Horecka-Lewitowicz; Martyna Gluszek-Osuch; Iwona Wawrzycka; Stanisław Gluszek
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2018-09-02       Impact factor: 1.932

10.  Effect of metastatic site on survival in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). An analysis of SEER data from 2010 to 2014.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Trikalinos; Benjamin R Tan; Manik Amin; Jingxia Liu; Ramaswamy Govindan; Daniel Morgensztern
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.