Literature DB >> 19240182

Prognostic factors influencing survival from metastatic (stage IV) gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma.

Cosimo Durante1, Houda Boukheris, Clarisse Dromain, Pierre Duvillard, Sophie Leboulleux, Dominique Elias, Thierry de Baere, David Malka, Jean Lumbroso, Joël Guigay, Martin Schlumberger, Michel Ducreux, Eric Baudin.   

Abstract

Survival of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma (GEP WDEC) is not well characterized. We evaluated the long-term outcome and prognostic factors for survival in 118 patients with distant metastases from GEP WDEC. Inclusion criteria were 1) pathological review by a single pathologist according to the present WHO criteria, 2) absence of previous therapy apart from surgery, 3) complete morphological evaluation within 3 months including somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and 4) follow-up at Gustave-Roussy Institute until death or study's end. Clinical, biological marker, and pathological parameters were analyzed in univariate and multivariate statistical models. Survival after the first complete imaging work-up of the metastatic disease was determined using Kaplan-Meier method. Overall, survival for 5 years after the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 54%. In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.08, P = 0.01), the number of liver metastases (HR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.4-8.3, P = 0.01), tumor slope (HR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0-1.1, P = 0.001), and initial surgery (HR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.8, P = 0.01) were predictive of survival. Five-year survival was 100%, 91% (95% CI, 51-98%), 62% (95% CI, 37-83%), and 9% (95% CI, 6-32%) when patients had 0, 1, 2, 3 or more poor prognostic features respectively. This study enables the stratification of metastatic GEP WDEC patients into distinct risk groups. These risk categories can be used to tailor therapeutic approaches and also to design and interpret clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19240182     DOI: 10.1677/ERC-08-0301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer        ISSN: 1351-0088            Impact factor:   5.678


  28 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Hisato Igarashi; Nao Fujimori; Masayuki Hijioka; Ken Kawabe; Yoshinao Oda; Robert T Jensen; Tetsuhide Ito
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  IMP3 expression in small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms: a new predictor of recurrence.

Authors:  Sara Massironi; Alessandro Del Gobbo; Federica Cavalcoli; Stefano Fiori; Dario Conte; Alessio Pellegrinelli; Massimo Milione; Stefano Ferrero
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Semi-quantitative visual assessment of hepatic tumor burden can reliably predict survival in neuroendocrine liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Sanaz Ameli; Ankur Pandey; Pegah Khoshpouri; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Pallavi Pandey; Zhen Li; Daoyu Hu; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluation of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI for whole-body staging of neuroendocrine tumours in comparison with 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.

Authors:  Lino M Sawicki; Cornelius Deuschl; Karsten Beiderwellen; Verena Ruhlmann; Thorsten D Poeppel; Philipp Heusch; Harald Lahner; Dagmar Führer; Andreas Bockisch; Ken Herrmann; Michael Forsting; Gerald Antoch; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Bone metastases in GEP-NET: response and long-term outcome after PRRT from a follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Amir Sabet; Feras Khalaf; Torjan Haslerud; Abdullah Al-Zreiqat; Amin Sabet; Birgit Simon; Thorsten D Pöppel; Hans-Jürgen Biersack; Samer Ezziddin
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-19

Review 6.  The pathological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors: common questions and tentative answers.

Authors:  Marco Volante; Luisella Righi; Alfredo Berruti; Guido Rindi; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  May bone-targeted radionuclide therapy overcome PRRT-refractory osseous disease in NET? A pilot report on (188)Re-HEDP treatment in progressive bone metastases after (177)Lu-octreotate.

Authors:  Amir Sabet; Feras Khalaf; Soha Mahjoob; Abdullah Al-Zreiqat; Hans-Jürgen Biersack; Samer Ezziddin
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-15

8.  Predictors of response to radio-embolization (TheraSphere®) treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastasis.

Authors:  Mohammed Shaheen; Mazen Hassanain; Murad Aljiffry; Tatiana Cabrera; Prosanto Chaudhury; Eve Simoneau; Nuttawut Kongkaewpaisarn; Ayat Salman; Juan Rivera; Mohammad Jamal; Robert Lisbona; Azzam Khankan; David Valenti; Peter Metrakos
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): recent insights and advances.

Authors:  Tetsuhide Ito; Hisato Igarashi; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  A Novel Nomogram to Predict the Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: an Analysis of the Italian Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis Database.

Authors:  Andrea Ruzzenente; Fabio Bagante; Francesca Bertuzzo; Luca Aldrighetti; Giorgio Ercolani; Felice Giuliante; Alessandro Ferrero; Guido Torzilli; Gian Luca Grazi; Francesca Ratti; Alessandro Cucchetti; Agostino M De Rose; Nadia Russolillo; Matteo Cimino; Pasquale Perri; Ivana Cataldo; Aldo Scarpa; Alfredo Guglielmi; Calogero Iacono
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.