Literature DB >> 21263089

Future directions in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: consensus report of the National Cancer Institute Neuroendocrine Tumor clinical trials planning meeting.

Matthew H Kulke1, Lillian L Siu, Joel E Tepper, George Fisher, Deborah Jaffe, Daniel G Haller, Lee M Ellis, Jacqueline K Benedetti, Emily K Bergsland, Timothy J Hobday, Eric Van Cutsem, James Pingpank, Kjell Oberg, Steven J Cohen, Mitchell C Posner, James C Yao.   

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise from a variety of anatomic sites and share the capacity for production of hormones and vasoactive peptides. Because of their perceived rarity, NETs have not historically been a focus of rigorous clinical research. However, the diagnosed incidence of NETs has been increasing, and the estimated prevalence in the United States exceeds 100,000 individuals. The recent completion of several phase III studies, including those evaluating octreotide, sunitinib, and everolimus, has demonstrated that rigorous evaluation of novel agents in this disease is both feasible and can lead to practice-changing outcomes. The NET Task Force of the National Cancer Institute GI Steering Committee convened a clinical trials planning meeting to identify key unmet needs, develop appropriate study end points, standardize clinical trial inclusion criteria, and formulate priorities for future NET studies for the US cooperative group program. Emphasis was placed on the development of well-designed clinical trials with clearly defined efficacy criteria. Key recommendations include the evaluation of pancreatic NET separately from NETs of other sites and the exclusion of patients with poorly differentiated histologies from trials focused on low-grade histologies. Studies evaluating novel agents for the control of hormonal syndromes should avoid somatostatin analog washout periods when possible and should include quality-of-life end points. Because of the observed long survival after progression of many patients, progression-free survival is recommended as a feasible and relevant primary end point for both phase III studies and phase II studies where a delay in progression is expected in the absence of radiologic responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21263089      PMCID: PMC3068065          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.2056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

Review 1.  Blinded independent central review of progression-free survival in phase III clinical trials: important design element or unnecessary expense?

Authors:  Lori E Dodd; Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin; C Carl Jaffe; Lawrence V Rubinstein; Janet Dancey; Margaret M Mooney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival.

Authors:  Kristine R Broglio; Donald A Berry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Cesar A Moran; Saul Suster; Domenico Coppola; Mark R Wick
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States.

Authors:  James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group.

Authors:  Anja Rinke; Hans-Helge Müller; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Klaus-Jochen Klose; Peter Barth; Matthias Wied; Christina Mayer; Behnaz Aminossadati; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Michael Bläker; Jan Harder; Christian Arnold; Thomas Gress; Rudolf Arnold
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Treatment of metastatic carcinoid tumors with radiolabeled biologic molecules.

Authors:  David Bushnell
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Radioembolization for unresectable neuroendocrine hepatic metastases using resin 90Y-microspheres: early results in 148 patients.

Authors:  Andrew S Kennedy; William A Dezarn; Patrick McNeillie; Doug Coldwell; Charles Nutting; Dennis Carter; Ravi Murthy; Steven Rose; Richard R P Warner; David Liu; Holger Palmedo; Carroll Overton; Bonita Jones; Riad Salem
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Radioembolization with selective internal radiation microspheres for neuroendocrine liver metastases.

Authors:  Julie King; Richard Quinn; Derek M Glenn; Julia Janssen; Denise Tong; Winston Liaw; David L Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase deficiency and response to temozolomide-based therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Matthew H Kulke; Jason L Hornick; Christine Frauenhoffer; Susanne Hooshmand; David P Ryan; Peter C Enzinger; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Jeffrey W Clark; Keith Stuart; Charles S Fuchs; Mark S Redston
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Efficacy of RAD001 (everolimus) and octreotide LAR in advanced low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors: results of a phase II study.

Authors:  James C Yao; Alexandria T Phan; David Z Chang; Robert A Wolff; Kenneth Hess; Sanjay Gupta; Carmen Jacobs; Jeannette E Mares; Andrea N Landgraf; Asif Rashid; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  108 in total

1.  High KIT and PDGFRA are associated with shorter patients survival in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, but mutations are a rare event.

Authors:  Thomas Knösel; Yuan Chen; Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann; Christine Danielczok; Martin Freesmeyer; Utz Settmacher; Christine Wurst; Stefan Schulz; Lin Lin Yang; Iver Petersen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Contemporary management of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Rebecca M Minter; Diane M Simeone
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  New treatments of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: why using them? How to use them?

Authors:  Eric Raymond; Philippe Ruszniewski
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 4.  Clinical review: Pituitary carcinoma: difficult diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Anthony P Heaney
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT): clinical significance of re-treatment?

Authors:  Irene Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Rapid dramatic alterations to the tumor microstructure in pancreatic cancer following irreversible electroporation ablation.

Authors:  Zhuoli Zhang; Weiguo Li; Daniel Procissi; Patrick Tyler; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 7.  Escalated-dose somatostatin analogues for antiproliferative effect in GEPNETS: a systematic review.

Authors:  David L Chan; Diego Ferone; Manuela Albertelli; Nick Pavlakis; Eva Segelov; Simron Singh
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  Alternate Endpoints for Phase II Trials in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imaoka; Mitsuhito Sasaki; Hideaki Takahashi; Yusuke Hashimoto; Izumi Ohno; Shuichi Mitsunaga; Kazuo Watanabe; Kumiko Umemoto; Gen Kimura; Yuko Suzuki; Motoyasu Kan; Masafumi Ikeda
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-02

9.  Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Overall Survival and Circulating Biomarkers From the Randomized, Phase III RADIANT-3 Study.

Authors:  James C Yao; Marianne Pavel; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Eric Van Cutsem; Maurizio Voi; Ulrike Brandt; Wei He; David Chen; Jaume Capdevila; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Paola Tomassetti; Timothy Hobday; Rodney Pommier; Kjell Öberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Targeted therapies in neuroendocrine tumors (NET): clinical trial challenges and lessons learned.

Authors:  James C Yao; Diane Reidy Lagunes; Matthew H Kulke
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.