Literature DB >> 29118267

Clinical Usefulness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnostic Algorithm of Advanced Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Maria Rinzivillo1, Stefano Partelli2, Daniela Prosperi3, Gabriele Capurso1, Patrizia Pizzichini3, Elsa Iannicelli4, Elettra Merola1, Francesca Muffatti2, Francesco Scopinaro3, Orazio Schillaci5, Matteo Salgarello6, Massimo Falconi2, Gianfranco Delle Fave1, Francesco Panzuto7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in the diagnostic algorithm of entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (EP NENs) is unclear because most available data derive from heterogeneous populations in terms of tumor biology and disease status at time of examination. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of 18F-FDG PET to identify patients with more aggressive disease among those with advanced EP NENs. Subjects, Materials, and Methods . Patients with advanced EP NENs and known disease status (progressive disease [PD] or stable disease [SD]) according to imaging procedures, who received 18F-FDG PET and computed tomography scans during a time frame of 1 month, were included.
RESULTS: A total of 93 patients, including 69 patients with pancreatic NENs and 24 patients with small-intestine NENs, were included. At the time of study entry, 64 patients (68.8%) had PD, and the remaining 29 patients (31.2%) had SD. A total of 62 patients (66.7%) had positive 18F-FDG PET, whereas 18F-FDG PET was negative in the remaining 31 patients (33.3%). Overall, 18F-FDG PET sensitivity and specificity to detect PD were 90.6% and 86.2%, respectively, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 89.2%. A positive 18F-FDG PET was significantly associated with PD at the time of study entry (p < .0001 at multivariate analysis). Although a higher proportion of 18F-FDG PET-positive examinations were observed in patients with higher tumor grade (p = .01), 53.8% of patients with grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) had positive 18F-FDG PET, and 37.5% of patients with grade 2 NETs had negative 18F-FDG PET. Overall survival was significantly shorter in 18F-FDG PET-positive patients (median: 60 months) in comparison with 18F-FDG PET-negative patients (median not reached; p = .008).
CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET has a high diagnostic accuracy to identify progression of disease with unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with advanced EP NENs. Knowledge of disease status and G grading are key factors for physicians to better select patients for whom 18F-FDG PET is clinically useful. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings of the present study may help physicians dealing with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms to select patients for whom 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useful to predict poor clinical outcome. © AlphaMed Press 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; Clinical usefulness; Diagnosis; Neuroendocrine tumors; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29118267      PMCID: PMC5813750          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  35 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Martin Hutchings; Annika Loft; Mads Hansen; Lars Møller Pedersen; Thora Buhl; Jesper Jurlander; Simon Buus; Susanne Keiding; Francesco D'Amore; Anne-Marie Boesen; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Lena Specht
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Gastroenteropancreatic (neuro)endocrine neoplasms: the histology report.

Authors:  Guido Rindi; C Bordi; S La Rosa; E Solcia; Gianfranco Delle Fave
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.088

4.  Role of Combined 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnostic Workup of Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors: Implications for Managing Surgical Decisions.

Authors:  Sara Cingarlini; Silvia Ortolani; Matteo Salgarello; Giovanni Butturini; Anna Malpaga; Veronica Malfatti; Mirko DʼOnofrio; Maria Vittoria Davì; Paola Vallerio; Andrea Ruzzenente; Paola Capelli; Elia Citton; Elisabetta Grego; Chiara Trentin; Riccardo De Robertis; Aldo Scarpa; Claudio Bassi; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression.

Authors:  Francesco Panzuto; Letizia Boninsegna; Nicola Fazio; Davide Campana; Maria Pia Brizzi; Gabriele Capurso; Aldo Scarpa; Filippo De Braud; Luigi Dogliotti; Paola Tomassetti; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Stage IV Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Risk Score to Predict Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Francesco Panzuto; Elettra Merola; Marianne Ellen Pavel; Anja Rinke; Patrizia Kump; Stefano Partelli; Maria Rinzivillo; Victor Rodriguez-Laval; Ulrich Frank Pape; Rainer Lipp; Thomas Gress; Bertram Wiedenmann; Massimo Falconi; Gianfranco Delle Fave
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-02-23

7.  Octreotide versus octreotide plus interferon-alpha in endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Rudolf Arnold; Anja Rinke; Klaus-Jochen Klose; Hans-Helge Müller; Matthias Wied; Karin Zamzow; Christina Schmidt; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Peter Barth; Roland Moll; Michael Koller; Michael Unterhalt; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Martin Schmidt-Lauber; Marianne Pavel; Christian N Arnold
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with metastatic endocrine tumors.

Authors:  Etienne Garin; Florence Le Jeune; Anne Devillers; Marc Cuggia; Anne-Sophie de Lajarte-Thirouard; Catherine Bouriel; Eveline Boucher; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts survival of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Tina Binderup; Ulrich Knigge; Annika Loft; Birgitte Federspiel; Andreas Kjaer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; H Alhman; M Caplin; A Couvelard; W W de Herder; B Erikssson; A Falchetti; M Falconi; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 2.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 3.  Prognostic and predictive value of nuclear imaging in endocrine oncology.

Authors:  Giorgio Treglia; Bernard Goichot; Luca Giovanella; Elif Hindié; Abhishek Jha; Karel Pacak; David Taïeb; Thomas Walter; Alessio Imperiale
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise.

Authors:  Mirco Bartolomei; Alfredo Berruti; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Diego Ferone; Secondo Lastoria; Giovanni Pappagallo; Ettore Seregni; Annibale Versari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Prognostic factors for the outcome of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in MEN1: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  S M Sadowski; C R C Pieterman; N D Perrier; F Triponez; G D Valk
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.678

6.  Characteristics, Treatment, Outcomes, and Survival in Neuroendocrine G1 and G2 Pancreatic Tumors: Experiences From a Single Tertiary Referral Center.

Authors:  Jan Calissendorff; Freja Bjellerup-Calissendorff; Robert Bränström; C Christofer Juhlin; Henrik Falhammar
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDG PET-CT Scans in the Evaluation of Primary Tumors and Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Zhihao Zhou; Zhixiong Wang; Bing Zhang; Yanzhang Wu; Guanghua Li; Zhao Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  New Directions in Imaging Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Julie Refardt; Johannes Hofland; Damian Wild; Emanuel Christ
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Irene Ramos-Alvarez; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  The Diagnostic and Grading Accuracy of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/MR for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Jinxin Zhou; Runze Zhao; Yu Pan; Huijun Ju; Xinyun Huang; Yu Jiang; Jiabin Jin; Yifan Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.