| Literature DB >> 28231145 |
Jing Hong1, Xin-An Zeng2, Charles S Brennan3, Margaret Brennan4, Zhong Han5.
Abstract
Esterification is one of the most important methods to alter the structure of starch granules and improve its applications. Conventionally, starch esters are prepared by conventional or dual modification techniques, which have the disadvantages of being expensive, have regent overdoses, and are time-consuming. In addition, the degree of substitution (DS) is often considered as the primary factor in view of its contribution to estimate substituted groups of starch esters. In order to improve the detection accuracy and production efficiency, different detection techniques, including titration, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermal gravimetric analysis/infrared spectroscopy (TGA/IR) and headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC), have been developed for DS. This paper gives a comprehensive overview on the recent advances in DS analysis and starch esterification techniques. Additionally, the advantages, limitations, some perspectives on future trends of these techniques and the applications of their derivatives in the food industry are also presented.Entities:
Keywords: activation; application; catalyst; cross-linking; dual modification; esterification; high pressure; high temperature; microwave; oxidation; pulsed electric fields; starch
Year: 2016 PMID: 28231145 PMCID: PMC5302408 DOI: 10.3390/foods5030050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Six levels of starch granule structure: level 1of individual branches, level 2 of amylose and amylopectin, level 3 of semi-crystalline lamellae, level 4 of growth rings, level 5 of starch granules, level 6 of cereal grains [2].
Effect of conventional and dual modification methods on acetyl content and degree of substitution (DS).
| Starch Type | Method | Starch Concentration ( | Anhydride Content (%) | pH | NaOH ( | Reaction Time (min) | Acetyl (%) | DS (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | Conventional | 29 | 8 | 7.8–8.4 | 4.0 | 60–180 | 2.2–5.3 | 0.080–0.210 | Ayucitra [ |
| Conventional | 25 | 1–3 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 360–1440 | - | 0.015–0.023 | Bhosale, et al. [ | |
| Inorganic reagents Catalyzed | 30 | 2–12 | 8.0–8.4 | 3.0 | ~100 | 3.4–4.7 | 0.133–0.154 | Singh, et al. [ | |
| High temperature | 32 | 32 | 8.0–8.5 | 3.0 | 200 | - | 0.810–2.890 | Chi, et al. [ | |
| Rice | Conventional | 31 | 6 | 8.0–8.4 | 3.0 | ~100 | 2.3–3.7 | 0.095–0.144 | Sodhi, et al. [ |
| Sodium carbonate assisted | 40 | 1–6 mL | 8.0–9.0 | - | 840 | - | 0.018–0.045 | Bao, et al. [ | |
| Potato | Conventional | 20–40 | 3 | 8.0, 8.5 | 3.0 | 120–360 | - | 0.012–0.015 | Ruan, et al. [ |
| Sodium carbonate assisted | 40 | 1–6 mL | 8.0–9.0 | - | 840 | - | 0.017–0.049 | Bao, et al. [ | |
| Inorganic reagents catalyzed | 30 | 2–12 | 8.0–8.4 | 3.0 | ~100 | 4.7–6.0 | 0.180–0.238 | Singh, et al. [ | |
| PEF–assisted | 30–40 | 6 | 8.0–8.5 | 3.0 | 60 | - | 0.054–0.130 | Hong, et al. [ | |
| Cassava | Microwave-assisted & High temperature | 87–93 | 3–5 | - | No use | 3–7 | 2 | 0.007–0.051 | Jyothi, et al. [ |
| Enzyme catalyzed & Microwave-assisted | 50 | - | - | No use | 2 | - | 0.330–1.10 | Rajan, et al. [ | |
| Amaranth | Conventional | 25 | 1–3 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 360–1440 | - | 0.016–0.027 | Bhosale, et al. [ |
“-” means that these data have not been listed in the articles. PEF means pulsed electric fields. The volume of 1–6 mL in the second column represent that the anhydride was added 1–6 mL by volume instead of mass percent as in the literature.
Figure 2The reaction mechanism of starch esterification (amylose and amylopectin). This scheme took acetic anhydride as an example.
The merits and demerits of diverse determination methods of DS since 2000.
| Determination Method | Types of Esters | Merits | Shortcomings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titration | OSA and ACS | Widely used; Better acceptance of its reaction mechanism; Determination of native starch | Complicated process for pretreatment; Increased sample consumption; Time-consuming; Special reaction environment; Color reversion after end point; CO2 disturbance; Pyridine used in sometimes | [ |
| Back-titration | OSA and ACS | Widely used; Better acceptance of its reaction mechanism; Avoids interference of atmospheric CO2 atmosphere; Determination of native starch | Excess alkali; Increased sample consumption; Color reversion after end point; | [ |
| Spectrophotometric | ACS | Less sample weight | double color determination; Repeated procedures; | [ |
| FT-IR | ACS | Less sample weight | Determination of series of standard with diverse DS; High cost; Use of titration method; Complicated and fussy procedures | [ |
| NMR (involving 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR) | OSA and ACS | Less sample weight; Simple procedure; Consistent results | the use of internal standards; High cost; Complicated and fussy procedure; Uses of DMSO and chloroform; Determination of DS and DB | [ |
| TGA/IR | ACS | Combination of two instruments | High energy consumption; High temperature; Diverse standard samples | [ |
| HS-GC | Cellulose | Less sample weight; Avoids interference of atmospheric CO2 | - | [ |
OSA, octenyl succinated starch; ACS, acetylated starch; DB, degree of branching; FT-IR, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; TGA/IR, Thermogravimetric analyzer/infrared spectroscopy; HS-GC, Headspace and gas chromatography. “-” means that there’s no use in starch modification in other literature.