Literature DB >> 28222081

Oncology Nursing Perceptions of Patient Electronic Portal Use: A Qualitative Analysis.

David E Gerber1, Muhammad Shaalan Beg1, Tobi Duncan1, Mary Gill1, Simon J Craddock Lee1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To identify nursing staff reactions to and perceptions of electronic portal use in a cancer setting.
. RESEARCH APPROACH: Qualitative.
.
SETTING: Outpatient clinic at the Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
. PARTICIPANTS: 13 nurses with a range of credentials and experience, representing infusion, medical oncology, and bone marrow transplantation clinics.
. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Two focus groups were conducted. Theoretical thematic content analysis of data was performed.
.
FINDINGS: Key themes that emerged for consideration of electronic portals included work volume and flow, patient expectations and safety, variation in use of communication technologies, and education and management.
.
INTERPRETATION: The current study provides insight into the implications of electronic portals by identifying nursing staff reactions to this technology. These reactions are predominantly related to the impact on clinical workload and patient safety and expectations.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: As clinical cancer facilities incorporate electronic portal technology into their operations, attention to the impact on staff workload, division of labor, patient safety, and patient expectations should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; communication; electronic health records; electronic portals; nursing
; patient health records

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28222081      PMCID: PMC7066859          DOI: 10.1188/17.ONF.165-170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  31 in total

1.  Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portal.

Authors:  Mita Sanghavi Goel; Tiffany L Brown; Adam Williams; Andrew J Cooper; Romana Hasnain-Wynia; David W Baker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  How health plans, health systems, and others in the private sector can stimulate 'meaningful use'.

Authors:  Sachin H Jain; Joshua Seidman; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Health information technology: revisions to initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Interim final rule with request for comments.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2010-10-13

4.  The future of oncology care with personal health records.

Authors:  Henry Feldman; Elizabeth S Rodriguez
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2012

5.  Changes in office visit use associated with electronic messaging and telephone encounters among patients with diabetes in the PCMH.

Authors:  David T Liss; Robert J Reid; David Grembowski; Carolyn M Rutter; Tyler R Ross; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Nurse and physician perspectives on patients with cancer having online access to their laboratory results.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Rodriguez; Bridgette Thom; Susan M Schneider
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice.

Authors:  Brian Fisher; Vanita Bhavnani; Marlene Winfield
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Referral selection bias in the Medicare hospital mortality prediction model: are centers of referral for Medicare beneficiaries necessarily centers of excellence?

Authors:  D J Ballard; S C Bryant; P C O'Brien; D W Smith; M B Pine; D A Cortese
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging.

Authors:  Andrea Hassol; James M Walker; David Kidder; Kim Rokita; David Young; Steven Pierdon; Deborah Deitz; Sarah Kuck; Eduardo Ortiz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings.

Authors:  Kim M Nazi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  6 in total

1.  Identifying How Patient Portals Impact Communication in Oncology.

Authors:  Jordan M Alpert; Bonny B Morris; Maria D Thomson; Khalid Matin; Richard F Brown
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-07-06

Review 2.  Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Patient-Professional Communication Over Patient Portals: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Authors:  Elina Laukka; Moona Huhtakangas; Tarja Heponiemi; Sari Kujala; Anu-Marja Kaihlanen; Kia Gluschkoff; Outi Kanste
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content.

Authors:  Chen Hsi Tsai; Aboozar Eghdam; Nadia Davoody; Graham Wright; Stephen Flowerday; Sabine Koch
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04

4.  Oncology Patients' Experiences With Novel Electronic Patient Portals to Support Care and Treatment: Qualitative Study With Early Users and Nonusers of Portals in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Amanda D Santos; Vera Caine; Paula J Robson; Linda Watson; Jacob C Easaw; Olga Petrovskaya
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2021-11-24

5.  Identifying and adapting interventions to reduce documentation burden and improve nurses' efficiency in using electronic health record systems (The IDEA Study): protocol for a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Gillian Strudwick; Lianne Jeffs; Jessica Kemp; Lydia Sequeira; Brian Lo; Nelson Shen; Petroiya Paterson; Noelle Coombe; Lily Yang; Kara Ronald; Wei Wang; Sonia Pagliaroli; Tania Tajirian; Sara Ling; Damian Jankowicz
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Delivery of cancer care via an outpatient telephone support line: a cross-sectional study of oncology nursing perspectives on quality and challenges.

Authors:  Hely Shah; Lisa Vandermeer; Fiona MacDonald; Gail Larocque; Shannon Nelson; Mark Clemons; Sharon F McGee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.