BACKGROUND: Previous studies of patient portals have found low rates of enrollment and significant disparities in enrollment by race and ethnicity. As the reasons for these findings are unclear, we sought to identify patient reported barriers to enrollment in a patient portal. METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey of patients in one urban general internal medicine clinic. Patients were eligible if they did not enroll within 30 days of receiving an electronic order inviting participation. Our primary outcomes were: (a) reasons for not enrolling in the patient portal; (b) reasons for not attempting enrollment; and (c) perceived benefits of the portal. RESULTS: Participants' (N=159) mean age was 51 years, 48% were black, 72% female, and 70% had a college degree or greater. 63% of respondents not enrolling reported never attempting enrollment despite remembering receiving an order. Most of these 63% did not attempt enrollment because of lack of information or motivation. Smaller proportions reported not attempting enrollment because of negative attitudes toward the portal (30%) or computer related obstacles (8%). Overall, respondents favorably viewed most patient portal features, however black respondents were less likely than white respondents to consider features assisting self-management such as getting test results (69% vs 86%; p<0.05) as important. Adjusting for age, gender, education, and chronic disease did not substantially change results. CONCLUSION: Strategies to increase enrollment in patient portals need to ensure patients understand patient portal features and receive follow-up reminders. Interventions to reduce racial disparities in enrollment must address attitudinal barriers and not focus solely on improving access.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies of patient portals have found low rates of enrollment and significant disparities in enrollment by race and ethnicity. As the reasons for these findings are unclear, we sought to identify patient reported barriers to enrollment in a patient portal. METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey of patients in one urban general internal medicine clinic. Patients were eligible if they did not enroll within 30 days of receiving an electronic order inviting participation. Our primary outcomes were: (a) reasons for not enrolling in the patient portal; (b) reasons for not attempting enrollment; and (c) perceived benefits of the portal. RESULTS:Participants' (N=159) mean age was 51 years, 48% were black, 72% female, and 70% had a college degree or greater. 63% of respondents not enrolling reported never attempting enrollment despite remembering receiving an order. Most of these 63% did not attempt enrollment because of lack of information or motivation. Smaller proportions reported not attempting enrollment because of negative attitudes toward the portal (30%) or computer related obstacles (8%). Overall, respondents favorably viewed most patient portal features, however black respondents were less likely than white respondents to consider features assisting self-management such as getting test results (69% vs 86%; p<0.05) as important. Adjusting for age, gender, education, and chronic disease did not substantially change results. CONCLUSION: Strategies to increase enrollment in patient portals need to ensure patients understand patient portal features and receive follow-up reminders. Interventions to reduce racial disparities in enrollment must address attitudinal barriers and not focus solely on improving access.
Authors: John Hsu; Jie Huang; James Kinsman; Bruce Fireman; Robert Miller; Joseph Selby; Eduardo Ortiz Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-11-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jeffrey L Schnipper; Tejal K Gandhi; Jonathan S Wald; Richard W Grant; Eric G Poon; Lynn A Volk; Alexandra Businger; Elizabeth Siteman; Lauren Buckel; Blackford Middleton Journal: Inform Prim Care Date: 2008
Authors: Andrea Hassol; James M Walker; David Kidder; Kim Rokita; David Young; Steven Pierdon; Deborah Deitz; Sarah Kuck; Eduardo Ortiz Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-08-06 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Chen-Tan Lin; Loretta Wittevrongel; Laurie Moore; Brenda L Beaty; Stephen E Ross Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2005-08-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stacy C Bailey; Rachel O'Conor; Elizabeth A Bojarski; Rebecca Mullen; Rachel E Patzer; Daniel Vicencio; Kara L Jacobson; Ruth M Parker; Michael S Wolf Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Matthew K Hong; Lauren Wilcox; Clayton Feustel; Karen Wasileski-Masker; Thomas A Olson; Stephen F Simoneaux Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2017-02-10
Authors: Jane Y Zhao; Buer Song; Edwin Anand; Diane Schwartz; Mandip Panesar; Gretchen P Jackson; Peter L Elkin Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-04-16
Authors: Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Julie Payne-Gagnon; Erik Breton; Jean-Paul Fortin; Lara Khoury; Lisa Dolovich; David Price; David Wiljer; Gillian Bartlett; Norman Archer Journal: Int J Health Policy Manag Date: 2016-07-01