Literature DB >> 33291615

Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content.

Chen Hsi Tsai1, Aboozar Eghdam1, Nadia Davoody1, Graham Wright2, Stephen Flowerday2, Sabine Koch1.   

Abstract

Despite the great advances in the field of electronic health records (EHRs) over the past 25 years, implementation and adoption challenges persist, and the benefits realized remain below expectations. This scoping review aimed to present current knowledge about the effects of EHR implementation and the barriers to EHR adoption and use. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore Digital Library and ACM Digital Library for studies published between January 2005 and May 2020. In total, 7641 studies were identified of which 142 met the criteria and attained the consensus of all researchers on inclusion. Most studies (n = 91) were published between 2017 and 2019 and 81 studies had the United States as the country of origin. Both positive and negative effects of EHR implementation were identified, relating to clinical work, data and information, patient care and economic impact. Resource constraints, poor/insufficient training and technical/educational support for users, as well as poor literacy and skills in technology were the identified barriers to adoption and use that occurred frequently. Although this review did not conduct a quality analysis of the included papers, the lack of uniformity in the use of EHR definitions and detailed contextual information concerning the study settings could be observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adoption; electronic health record; implementation; personal health record; scoping review

Year:  2020        PMID: 33291615      PMCID: PMC7761950          DOI: 10.3390/life10120327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-1729


  149 in total

1.  Use and satisfaction with electronic health record by primary care physicians in a health district in Brazil.

Authors:  Alexandre Alcantara Holanda; Henrique Luis do Carmo E Sá; Anya Pimentel Gomes Fernandes Vieira; Ana Maria Fontenelle Catrib
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Early cost and safety benefits of an inpatient electronic health record.

Authors:  Jonathan A Zlabek; Jared W Wickus; Michelle A Mathiason
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Standards for the electronic transfer of clinical data: progress and promises.

Authors:  C J McDonald; D K Martin; J M Overhage
Journal:  Top Health Rec Manage       Date:  1991-06

4.  The Role of the Electronic Medical Record in the Intensive Care Unit Nurse's Detection of Patient Deterioration: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Laurel A Despins; Bonnie J Wakefield
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Public and physician's expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security.

Authors:  Eleni Entzeridou; Evgenia Markopoulou; Vasiliki Mollaki
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 6.  The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa Ann Baumann; Jannah Baker; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; David W Bates; Chelsea Jenter; E John Orav; Jie Zheng; Paul Cleary; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  EHRs in primary care practices: benefits, challenges, and successful strategies.

Authors:  Debora Goetz Goldberg; Anton J Kuzel; Lisa Bo Feng; Jonathan P DeShazo; Linda E Love
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Duaa Aljabri; Adrian Dumitrascu; M Caroline Burton; Launia White; Mahmud Khan; Sudha Xirasagar; Ronnie Horner; James Naessens
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Difference Between Users and Nonusers of a Patient Portal in Health Behaviors and Outcomes: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Yong Chen; J Richard Landis; Kevin B Mahoney
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Electronic Medical Records for (Visceral) Medicine: An Overview of the Current Status and Prospects.

Authors:  Sven Kernebeck; Theresa Sophie Busse; Chantal Jux; Ulrich Bork; Jan P Ehlers
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-09-22

2.  Perceptions on Data Quality, Use, and Management Following the Adoption of Tablet-Based Electronic Health Records: Results from a Pre-Post Survey with District Health Officers in Ghana.

Authors:  Seohyun Lee; Young-Ji Lee; SeYeon Kim; Wonil Choi; Yoojin Jeong; Nina Jinjoo Rhim; Ilwon Seo; Sun-Young Kim
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  Team Up For Quality Care:: The Role of Primary Care Teams in Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Cindy Biederman
Journal:  Dela J Public Health       Date:  2021-12-15

4.  Acute vital signs changes are underrepresented by a conventional electronic health record when compared with automatically acquired data in a single-center tertiary pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.

Authors:  Adam W Lowry; Craig A Futterman; Avihu Z Gazit
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.942

5.  Health Professionals' eHealth Literacy and System Experience Before and 3 Months After the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System: Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Lars Kayser; Astrid Karnoe; Emily Duminski; Svend Jakobsen; Rikke Terp; Susanne Dansholm; Michael Roeder; Gustav From
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-04-29

6.  Healthcare providers' readiness for electronic health record adoption: a cross-sectional study during pre-implementation phase.

Authors:  Habtamu Setegn Ngusie; Sisay Yitayih Kassie; Alex Ayenew Chereka; Ermias Bekele Enyew
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Development an extended-information success system model (ISSM) based on nurses' point of view for hospital EHRs: a combined framework and questionnaire.

Authors:  Zahra Ebnehoseini; Hamed Tabesh; Amir Deghatipour; Mahmood Tara
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Advances in E-Health.

Authors:  Vivian Vimarlund; Sabine Koch; Christian Nøhr
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians.

Authors:  Sven Kernebeck; Chantal Jux; Theresa Sophie Busse; Dorothee Meyer; Larissa Alice Dreier; Daniel Zenz; Boris Zernikow; Jan Peter Ehlers
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06

10.  Evaluation of an Electronic Medical Record Module for Nursing Documentation in Paediatric Palliative Care: Involvement of Nurses with a Think-Aloud Approach.

Authors:  Sven Kernebeck; Theresa Sophie Busse; Chantal Jux; Larissa Alice Dreier; Dorothee Meyer; Daniel Zenz; Boris Zernikow; Jan Peter Ehlers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.