Literature DB >> 28220342

Icons for health effects of cigarette smoke: a test of semiotic type.

Allison J Lazard1, Annie Schmidt2, Huyen Vu3, M Justin Byron2,3, Ellen Peters4, Marcella H Boynton2,3, Noel T Brewer2,3.   

Abstract

We sought to identify icons to effectively communicate health harms of chemicals in cigarette smoke. Participants were a convenience sample of 701 U.S. adults. A within-subjects online experiment explored the effects of icon semiotic type: symbolic (arbitrary, most abstract), indexical, and iconic (representative, most concrete). Outcomes were perceived representation, affect toward smoking, elaboration, perceived severity, and perceived effectiveness. For not-easy-to-visualize harms of cancer and addiction, symbolic icons received the highest ratings (all p < .001). For easy-to-visualize symptoms of heart attack/stroke, indexical icons received the highest ratings (all p < .001). For easy-to-visualize harm of reproductive organ damage, the iconic image did best (all p < .001). Icon type often had a larger impact among participants with higher health literacy. Symbolic icons may be most effective for health effects not easily visualized. Iconic or indexical icons may be more effective for health effects attributable to specific body parts or symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cigarette; Health effects; Icons; Pictograph; Warning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28220342      PMCID: PMC5501993          DOI: 10.1007/s10865-017-9833-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  25 in total

1.  Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy.

Authors:  D W Baker; M V Williams; R M Parker; J A Gazmararian; J Nurss
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-09

2.  A Taxonomy of Representation Strategies in Iconic Communication.

Authors:  Carlos Nakamura; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.632

3.  "My First Thought was Croutons": Perceptions of Cigarettes and Cigarette Smoke Constituents Among Adult Smokers and Nonsmokers.

Authors:  Kathryn E Moracco; Jennifer C Morgan; Jennifer Mendel; Randall Teal; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Metaphor in formative evaluation and message design: an application to relationships and alcohol use.

Authors:  Pradeep Sopory
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2005

5.  Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mirta Galesic
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Should We Be Afraid of Simple Messages? The Effects of Text Difficulty and Illustrations in People With Low or High Health Literacy.

Authors:  Corine S Meppelink; Edith G Smit; Bianca M Buurman; Julia C M van Weert
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2015

7.  Longitudinal predictors of human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in a high-risk geographic area.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Sami L Gottlieb; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Nicole Liddon; Lauri Markowitz; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  An overview of the effects of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry and toxicity.

Authors:  Richard R Baker; Eian D Massey; Graham Smith
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 9.  Tobacco industry manipulation of nicotine dosing.

Authors:  Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Carrie M Carpenter
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2009

Review 10.  Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke.

Authors:  J Fowles; E Dybing
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optimizing Warnings on E-Cigarette Advertisements.

Authors:  Jessica L King; Allison Lazard; Beth A Reboussin; Leah Ranney; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Developing Pictorial Cigarillo Warnings: Insights From Focus Groups.

Authors:  Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Jessica L King; Allison J Lazard; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Desmond Jenson; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Experts' Perceptions of and Suggestions for Cigar Warning Label Messages and Pictorials.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Michelle Jeong; Kevin R J Schroth; Mariam Rashid; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Considerations and Future Research Directions for E-Cigarette Warnings-Findings from Expert Interviews.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; David Hammond; Richard J O'Connor; Andrew A Strasser; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effective Formats for Communicating Risks from Cigarette Smoke Chemicals.

Authors:  M Justin Byron; Allison J Lazard; Ellen Peters; Huyen Vu; Annie Schmidt; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.