Literature DB >> 19184659

Tobacco industry manipulation of nicotine dosing.

Geoffrey Ferris Wayne1, Carrie M Carpenter.   

Abstract

For more than a half century, tobacco manufacturers have conducted sophisticated internal research to evaluate nicotine delivery, and modified their products to ensure availability of nicotine to smokers and to optimize its effects. Tobacco has proven to be a particularly effective vehicle for nicotine, enabling manipulation of smoke chemistry and of mechanisms of delivery, and providing sensory cues that critically inform patterns of smoking behavior as well as reinforce the impact of nicotine. A range of physical and chemical product design changes provide precise control over the quantity, form, and perception of nicotine dose, and support compensatory behavior, which is driven by the smoker's addiction to nicotine. Cigarette manufacturers also enhance the physiological effects of nicotine through the introduction and use of compounds that interact with nicotine but do not directly alter its form or delivery. A review of internal documents indicates important historical differences, as well as significant differences between commercial brands, underscoring the effectiveness of methods adopted by manufacturers to control nicotine dosing and target the needs of specific populations of smokers through commercial product development. Although the focus of the current review is on the manipulation of nicotine dosing characteristics, the evidence indicates that product design facilitates tobacco addiction through diverse addiction-potentiating mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184659     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69248-5_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol        ISSN: 0171-2004


  8 in total

1.  Method for the determination of ammonium in cigarette tobacco using ion chromatography.

Authors:  Christina Vaughan Watson; Liza Valentin-Blasini; Maria Damian; Clifford H Watson
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Preliminary test of cigarette nicotine discrimination threshold in non-dependent versus dependent smokers.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Nicole Kunkle; Joshua L Karelitz; K A Perkins; N Kunkle; J L Karelitz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model.

Authors:  Alison Breland; Robert L Balster; Caroline Cobb; Pebbles Fagan; Jonathan Foulds; J Randy Koch; Thokozeni Lipato; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh; Shumei Sun; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2019-04

4.  Smokers' and nonsmokers' beliefs about harmful tobacco constituents: implications for FDA communication efforts.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Icons for health effects of cigarette smoke: a test of semiotic type.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard; Annie Schmidt; Huyen Vu; M Justin Byron; Ellen Peters; Marcella H Boynton; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-20

Review 6.  Acute nicotine reinforcement requires ability to discriminate the stimulus effects of nicotine.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Oral Nicotine Self-Administration in Rodents.

Authors:  Allan C Collins; Sakire Pogun; Tanseli Nesil; Lutfiye Kanit
Journal:  J Addict Res Ther       Date:  2012-06-01

8.  Ultraprocessed Food: Addictive, Toxic, and Ready for Regulation.

Authors:  Robert H Lustig
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.