Literature DB >> 20116159

Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].

Rocio Garcia-Retamero1, Mirta Galesic.   

Abstract

Many people have difficulties grasping numerical concepts that are prerequisites for understanding treatment risk reduction. Visual aids have been proposed as a promising method for enhancing comprehension. In a survey of probabilistic, nationally representative samples in two different countries (United States and Germany), we compared the effectiveness of adding different types of visual aids (icon arrays and bar graphs representing either affected individuals only or the entire population at risk) to the numerical information in either an absolute or a relative risk reduction format. We also analyzed whether people's numeracy and graphical literacy skills affected the efficacy of the visual aids. Our results showed large improvements in accuracy both when icon arrays and when bar graphs were added to numerical information. Highest increases were achieved when the visual aids depicted the entire population at risk. Importantly, visual aids were most useful for the participants who had low numeracy but relatively high graphical literacy skills. Building on previous research showing that problems with understanding numerical information often do not reside in people's minds, but in the representation of the problem, our results show that visual aids help to modify incorrect expectations about treatment risk reduction. Our results have important implications for medical practice. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20116159     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  56 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Impact of Information Presentation Format on Preference for Total Knee Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; W Benjamin Nowell; Christine E Stake; Shilpa Venkatachalam; Rachel Eyler; George Michel; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Development and Validation of the Spanish Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jacobs; Cindy M Walker; Tamara Miller; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Pamela S Ganschow; Diana Imbert; Maria O'Connell; Joan M Neuner; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Using visual displays to communicate risk of cancer to women from diverse race/ethnic backgrounds.

Authors:  Sabrina T Wong; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sue E Kim; Steven E Gregorich; George F Sawaya; Judith M E Walsh; A Eugene Washington; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-01-12

5.  Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change.

Authors:  Yasmina Okan; Eva Janssen; Mirta Galesic; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Benefits and harms of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to reduce breast cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.

Authors:  Jennifer G McIntosh; Jesse Minshall; Sibel Saya; Adrian Bickerstaffe; Nadira Hewabandu; Ashleigh Qama; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Caisa E Royer; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-10

8.  Nurses' Numeracy and Graphical Literacy: Informing Studies of Clinical Decision Support Interfaces.

Authors:  Karen Dunn Lopez; Diana J Wilkie; Yingwei Yao; Vanessa Sousa; Alessandro Febretti; Janet Stifter; Andrew Johnson; Gail M Keenan
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.597

9.  Effect of format on comprehension of adherence data in chronic disease: A cross-sectional study in HIV.

Authors:  Anita Lyons; Warren B Bilker; Janet Hines; Robert Gross
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-08-04

10.  Development of a Standardized Approach to Disclosing Amyloid Imaging Research Results in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Jennifer H Lingler; Meryl A Butters; Amanda L Gentry; Lu Hu; Amanda E Hunsaker; William E Klunk; Meghan K Mattos; Lisa S Parker; J Scott Roberts; Richard Schulz
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.