Literature DB >> 19826308

Strength and conditioning practices of United States high school strength and conditioning coaches.

Michael D Duehring1, Christina R Feldmann, William P Ebben.   

Abstract

This study describes the results of a survey of the practices of high school strength and conditioning (HS S&C) coaches. Thirty-eight of 128 (29.7%) HS S&C coaches, who were surveyed, responded. This survey examines background information, physical testing, flexibility development, speed development, agility development, plyometrics, strength/power development and program design, nutrition, and injury frequency. High school strength and conditioning coaches average 14.78 years in the profession, and 89% of the survey respondents were certified by the National Strength and Conditioning Association. Coaches assess an average of 5.83 different parameters of fitness, with strength as well as power being the most common parameters assessed. Coaches tested an average of 3.86 times a year with an average of 8.51 specific tests per testing session. All HS S&C coaches used a variety of flexibility development strategies using dynamic stretching more frequently than static. Thirty-six of 38 (95%) coaches follow a periodization model, 37 of 38 (97.4%) coaches indicated that their athletes used Olympic-style lifts, and 37 of 37 (100%) coaches responding to this question used plyometric training with their athletes. The squat and its variations, as well as the Olympic-style lifts and its variations, were most frequently identified as the most important exercises prescribed. All coaches use speed development and agility training strategies with their athletes. This survey examined a variety of other practices and provides detailed information about these practices at the high school level. Coaches are encouraged to review the strength and conditioning practices described in this survey and identify and implement the ideas that may improve their practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826308     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bac62d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SELF-MASSAGE VOLUMES ON THE FMS™ OVERHEAD DEEP SQUAT PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Estêvão Rios Monteiro; Jakob Škarabot; Andrew D Vigotsky; Amanda Fernandes Brown; Thiago Matassoli Gomes; Jefferson da Silva Novaes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-02

2.  Reliability of the one-repetition-maximum power clean test in adolescent athletes.

Authors:  Avery D Faigenbaum; James E McFarland; Robert E Herman; Fernando Naclerio; Nicholas A Ratamess; Jie Kang; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  A comparison of low volume 'high-intensity-training' and high volume traditional resistance training methods on muscular performance, body composition, and subjective assessments of training.

Authors:  J Giessing; B Eichmann; J Steele; J Fisher
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.806

4.  Rate of Performance Change in American Female Weightlifters Over Ten Years of Competition.

Authors:  Jason D Miller; Heidi C Ventresca; Lindsay E Bracken
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-05-01

5.  Efficacy of School-Based Interventions for Improving Muscular Fitness Outcomes in Adolescent Boys: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Stuart J Fairclough; Maria-Christina Kosteli; Robert J Noonan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The acute and prolonged effects of 20-s static stretching on muscle strength and shear elastic modulus.

Authors:  Shigeru Sato; Ryosuke Kiyono; Nobushige Takahashi; Tomoichi Yoshida; Kosuke Takeuchi; Masatoshi Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.