Literature DB >> 27525179

SPECIFIC AND CROSS-OVER EFFECTS OF FOAM ROLLING ON ANKLE DORSIFLEXION RANGE OF MOTION.

Shane Kelly1, Chris Beardsley2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flexibility is an important physical quality. Self-myofascial release (SMFR) methods such as foam rolling (FR) increase flexibility acutely but how long such increases in range of motion (ROM) last is unclear. Static stretching (SS) also increases flexibility acutely and produces a cross-over effect to contralateral limbs. FR may also produce a cross-over effect to contralateral limbs but this has not yet been identified.
PURPOSE: To explore the potential cross-over effect of SMFR by investigating the effects of a FR treatment on the ipsilateral limb of 3 bouts of 30 seconds on changes in ipsilateral and contralateral ankle DF ROM and to assess the time-course of those effects up to 20 minutes post-treatment.
METHODS: A within- and between-subject design was carried out in a convenience sample of 26 subjects, allocated into FR (n=13) and control (CON, n=13) groups. Ankle DF ROM was recorded at baseline with the in-line weight-bearing lunge test for both ipsilateral and contralateral legs and at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 minutes following either a two-minute seated rest (CON) or 3 3 30 seconds of FR of the plantar flexors of the dominant leg (FR). Repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine differences in ankle DF ROM.
RESULTS: No significant between-group effect was seen following the intervention. However, a significant within-group effect (p<0.05) in the FR group was seen between baseline and all post-treatment time-points (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes). Significant within-group effects (p<0.05) were also seen in the ipsilateral leg between baseline and at all post-treatment time-points, and in the contralateral leg up to 10 minutes post-treatment, indicating the presence of a cross-over effect.
CONCLUSIONS: FR improves ankle DF ROM for at least 20 minutes in the ipsilateral limb and up to 10 minutes in the contralateral limb, indicating that FR produces a cross-over effect into the contralateral limb. The mechanism producing these cross-over effects is unclear but may involve increased stretch tolerance, as observed following SS. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: 2c.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexibility; self-massage; self-myofascial release

Year:  2016        PMID: 27525179      PMCID: PMC4970845     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  35 in total

1.  Foot placement modifies kinematics and kinetics during drop jumping.

Authors:  I Kovács; J Tihanyi; P Devita; L Rácz; J Barrier; T Hortobágyi
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Biomechanical risk factors for exercise-related lower limb injuries.

Authors:  F G Neely
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Unilateral plantar flexors static-stretching effects on ipsilateral and contralateral jump measures.

Authors:  Josinaldo Jarbas da Silva; David George Behm; Willy Andrade Gomes; Fernando Henrique Domingues de Oliveira Silva; Enrico Gori Soares; Érica Paes Serpa; Guanis de Barros Vilela Junior; Charles Ricardo Lopes; Paulo Henrique Marchetti
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Roller massager improves range of motion of plantar flexor muscles without subsequent decreases in force parameters.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Saied Jalal Aboodarda; Duane C Button; Lars L Andersen; David G Behm
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-02

5.  Acute influence of restricted ankle dorsiflexion angle on knee joint mechanics during gait.

Authors:  S Ota; M Ueda; K Aimoto; Y Suzuki; S M Sigward
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Analgesic effects of manual therapy in patients with musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lennard Voogt; Jurryt de Vries; Mira Meeus; Filip Struyf; Duncan Meuffels; Jo Nijs
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-09-19

7.  Ankle biomechanics during four landing techniques.

Authors:  B P Self; D Paine
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries.

Authors:  K R Kaufman; S K Brodine; R A Shaffer; C W Johnson; T R Cullison
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge.

Authors:  David J Bradbury-Squires; Jennifer C Noftall; Kathleen M Sullivan; David G Behm; Kevin E Power; Duane C Button
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2008-11-21
View more
  31 in total

1.  Foam Rolling and Joint Distraction with Elastic Band Training Performed for 5-7 Weeks Respectively Improve Lower Limb Flexibility.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Yann Kerautret; Florian Queyrel; William Schobb; Franck Di Rienzo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Effects of a Vibrating Foam Roller on Ipsilateral and Contralateral Neuromuscular Function and the Hamstrings-to-Quadriceps Ratios.

Authors:  Rachel M Ruggieri; Jared W Coburn; Andrew J Galpin; Pablo B Costa
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

3.  ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SELF-MASSAGE VOLUMES ON THE FMS™ OVERHEAD DEEP SQUAT PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Estêvão Rios Monteiro; Jakob Škarabot; Andrew D Vigotsky; Amanda Fernandes Brown; Thiago Matassoli Gomes; Jefferson da Silva Novaes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-02

4.  Unilateral Rolling of the Foot did not Affect Non-Local Range of Motion or Balance.

Authors:  Lena Grabow; James D Young; Jeannette M Byrne; Urs Granacher; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  COMPARISON OF VIDEO-GUIDED, LIVE INSTRUCTED, AND SELF-GUIDED FOAM ROLL INTERVENTIONS ON KNEE JOINT RANGE OF MOTION AND PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Morey J Kolber; Matt Cain
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

6.  Foam Rolling and Muscle and Joint Proprioception After Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage.

Authors:  Aynollah Naderi; Mohammad Hossein Rezvani; Hans Degens
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Anna-Lena Müller; Florian Giesche; Gerard Power; Hamid Ahmedi; David G Behm
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The Addition of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Roller Massage Alone or in Combination Did Not Increase Pain Tolerance or Range of Motion.

Authors:  James D Young; Alyssa-Joy Spence; Gerard Power; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 9.  Do Self-Myofascial Release Devices Release Myofascia? Rolling Mechanisms: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  David G Behm; Jan Wilke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  DURATION OF MYOFASCIAL ROLLING FOR OPTIMAL RECOVERY, RANGE OF MOTION, AND PERFORMANCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Authors:  Garrett A Hughes; Leanne M Ramer
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.