Literature DB >> 28205497

Critical Motor Involvement in Prediction of Human and Non-biological Motion Trajectories.

Matthieu M de Wit1, Laurel J Buxbaum1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Adaptive interaction with the environment requires the ability to predict both human and non-biological motion trajectories. Prior accounts of the neurocognitive basis for prediction of these two motion classes may generally be divided into those that posit that non-biological motion trajectories are predicted using the same motor planning and/or simulation mechanisms used for human actions, and those that posit distinct mechanisms for each. Using brain lesion patients and healthy controls, this study examined critical neural substrates and behavioral correlates of human and non-biological motion prediction.
METHODS: Twenty-seven left hemisphere stroke patients and 13 neurologically intact controls performed a visual occlusion task requiring prediction of pantomimed tool use, real tool use, and non-biological motion videos. Patients were also assessed with measures of motor strength and speed, praxis, and action recognition.
RESULTS: Prediction impairment for both human and non-biological motion was associated with limb apraxia and, weakly, with the severity of motor production deficits, but not with action recognition ability. Furthermore, impairment for human and non-biological motion prediction was equivalently associated with lesions in the left inferior parietal cortex, left dorsal frontal cortex, and the left insula.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that motor planning mechanisms associated with specific loci in the sensorimotor network are critical for prediction of spatiotemporal trajectory information characteristic of both human and non-biological motions. (JINS, 2017, 23, 171-184).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological motion; Domain-general; Domain-specific; Forward model; Hemiparesis; Insula; Limb apraxia; Motor planning; Parietal; Premotor; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28205497      PMCID: PMC5360459          DOI: 10.1017/S1355617716001144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  69 in total

1.  Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework.

Authors:  Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; D E Glaser; J Grèzes; R E Passingham; P Haggard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Accurate reaching after active but not passive movements of the hand: evidence for forward modeling.

Authors:  H Branch Coslett; Laurel J Buxbaum; John Schwoebel
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.342

5.  Congruent unilateral impairments for real and imagined hand movements.

Authors:  A Sirigu; L Cohen; J R Duhamel; B Pillon; B Dubois; Y Agid; C Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1995-05-09       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  An action-incongruent secondary task modulates prediction accuracy in experienced performers: evidence for motor simulation.

Authors:  Desmond Mulligan; Keith R Lohse; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-05-29

7.  Movement kinematics affect action prediction: comparing human to non-human point-light actions.

Authors:  Waltraud Stadler; Anne Springer; Jim Parkinson; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-13

8.  Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action.

Authors:  G Knoblich; R Flach
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

9.  Predicting point-light actions in real-time.

Authors:  Markus Graf; Bianca Reitzner; Caroline Corves; Antonino Casile; Martin Giese; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The impact of unilateral brain damage on anticipatory grip force scaling when lifting everyday objects.

Authors:  S Eidenmüller; J Randerath; G Goldenberg; Y Li; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Limb apraxia and the left parietal lobe.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Jennifer Randerath
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

2.  Transient Disruption of the Inferior Parietal Lobule Impairs the Ability to Attribute Intention to Action.

Authors:  Jean-François Patri; Andrea Cavallo; Kiri Pullar; Marco Soriano; Martina Valente; Atesh Koul; Alessio Avenanti; Stefano Panzeri; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  What neuromodulation and lesion studies tell us about the function of the mirror neuron system and embodied cognition.

Authors:  Christian Keysers; Riccardo Paracampo; Valeria Gazzola
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-04-11

4.  Measuring the prediction of observed actions using an occlusion paradigm: Comparing autistic and non-autistic adults.

Authors:  Emma Gowen; Ellen Poliakoff; Hayley Shepherd; Waltraud Stadler
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.633

5.  Where and how our brain represents the temporal structure of observed action.

Authors:  R M Thomas; T De Sanctis; V Gazzola; C Keysers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 6.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.